Literature DB >> 26616687

Microbiome of titanium and zirconia dental implants abutments.

Cássio do Nascimento1, Murillo Sucena Pita2, Emerson de Souza Santos3, Nadia Monesi3, Vinícius Pedrazzi2, Rubens Ferreira de Albuquerque Junior4, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study employed culture-independent molecular techniques to extend the characterization of the microbial diversity of biofilm associated with either titanium or zirconia implant-abutments, including not-yet-cultivated bacteria species, and to identify and quantify species recovered from peri-implantar/periodontal sulci, supragingival biofilm and the internal parts of implants. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone level were also evaluated over time and correlated with biofilm formation.
METHODS: Twenty healthy participants were analyzed. DNA-Checkerboard and 16S-rDNA-Pyrosequencing were used to quantify and determine species identity.
RESULTS: 161 bacterial taxa representing 12 different phylotypes were found, of which 25% were non-cultivable. Species common to all sites belonged to genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Actinomyces, Porphyromonas, Veillonella and Streptococcus. While some species were subject-specific and detected in most sites, other species were site-specific. Moderate to higher levels of unclassified species were found colonizing titanium-related sites. Pathogenic and non-pathogenic species were detected colonizing oral sites in both materials. Titanium-related sites presented the highest total microbial count and higher counts of pathogenic species.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed differences regarding microbial diversity and microorganisms counts in oral biofilm associated with titanium or zirconia. The obtained data suggests a possible relation between microbiological findings and clinical outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: Next-generation methods of detection have provided new insights on complex microbiota colonizing different sites of oral cavity. The present study demonstrates relevant differences in the communities and microbial counts colonizing different tested substrates with consequent significant differences in the clinical-outcomes, suggesting a probably different mechanism for specific bacterial adhesion.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Biofilm; Clinical outcomes; Dental implants; Molecular genetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26616687     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  15 in total

1.  Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants.

Authors:  Thalisson S O Silva; Alice R Freitas; Marília L L Pinheiro; Cássio do Nascimento; Evandro Watanabe; Rubens F Albuquerque
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Effect of different abutment materials (zirconia or titanium) on the crestal bone height in 1 year.

Authors:  Vinayak Bharate; Yogesh Kumar; Dheeraj Koli; Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-10-24

3.  Microgap and microleakage of a hybrid connection platform-switched implant system in the absence or presence of a silicone-based sealing agent.

Authors:  Pedro Ferrás Fernandes; Liliana Grenho; Maria Helena Fernandes; João Carlos Sampaio-Fernandes; Pedro Sousa Gomes
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Oral bacterial colonization on dental implants restored with titanium or zirconia abutments: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Alice Ramos de Freitas; Thalisson Saymo de Oliveira Silva; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Rubens Ferreira de Albuquerque Junior; Vinícius Pedrazzi; Cássio do Nascimento
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of Fabrication Technique on the Microgap of CAD/CAM Cobalt-Chrome and Zirconia Abutments on a Conical Connection Implant: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Pedro Molinero-Mourelle; Rocio Cascos-Sanchez; Burak Yilmaz; Walter Yu Hang Lam; Edmond Ho Nang Pow; Jaime Del Río Highsmith; Miguel Gómez-Polo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms.

Authors:  Yu Hao; Xiaoyu Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Mingyun Li; Biao Ren; Xian Peng; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  In Vitro Evaluation of Bacterial Adhesion and Bacterial Viability of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Porphyromonas gingivalis on the Abutment Surface of Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants.

Authors:  Ana Stefany Meza-Siccha; Miguel Angel Aguilar-Luis; Wilmer Silva-Caso; Fernando Mazulis; Carolina Barragan-Salazar; Juana Del Valle-Mendoza
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 8.  Surface Characterization of Electro-Assisted Titanium Implants: A Multi-Technique Approach.

Authors:  Stefania Cometa; Maria A Bonifacio; Ana M Ferreira; Piergiorgio Gentile; Elvira De Giglio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Bacterial adhesion to biomaterials: What regulates this attachment? A review.

Authors:  Simone Kreve; Andréa C Dos Reis
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2021-06-12

Review 10.  Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications.

Authors:  Torsten Sterzenbach; Ralf Helbig; Christian Hannig; Matthias Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.