Zhihui Dong1, Junjie Ning2, Weiguo Fu3, Daqiao Guo2, Xin Xu2, Bin Chen2, Junhao Jiang2, Yuqi Wang2. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: dzh926@126.com. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: fu.weiguo@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To discuss failures and lessons in the endovascular treatment of symptomatic isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SIDSMA). METHODS: Data from 33 patients with SIDSMA treated between July 2007 and September 2013 were retrospectively collected. The technical failures in and lessons from endovascular management were analyzed in terms of causes and prophylaxis. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were successfully treated medically, 13 underwent stent placement, 1 underwent a hybrid procedure, and 1 had open fenestration. Full follow-ups (37 ± 21 months) were achieved in 28 patients. Failures to cannulate the true lumen occurred in 8 patients. Among these patients, femoral and brachial approaches were taken in 6 and 2 patients, respectively, and a 2-sided Fisher's exact test revealed no significant differences (P = 0.204). Among the 6 femoral failures, the true lumina were cannulated after conversion to the brachial approach in 3 cases. The perfusion of the distal SMA was not improved until the second stent was distally placed to cover the entire expanded false lumen in 1 case. Numerous branches originating from the false lumen were overlooked in 1 patient and were apparently compromised after stenting. Consequently, the patient died of intestinal necrosis. In a patient with a huge dissecting aneurysm, a stent was misplaced across the false lumen. Fortunately, a remarkable aneurysmal thrombosis formed at 3 months. In a patient who received a hybrid procedure, the stent was occluded at 2 weeks, most likely because the thrombus protruded into the stent. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty in cannulating the true lumen is not uncommon in the endovascular treatment of SIDSMA, and the selection of the arterial approach would benefit from being based on the morphology of the SMA arch. The lengths and branches of the involvement of the false lumen should be evaluated beforehand. Covered stents would be a reasonable option for lumina that contain thrombi.
BACKGROUND: To discuss failures and lessons in the endovascular treatment of symptomatic isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SIDSMA). METHODS: Data from 33 patients with SIDSMA treated between July 2007 and September 2013 were retrospectively collected. The technical failures in and lessons from endovascular management were analyzed in terms of causes and prophylaxis. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were successfully treated medically, 13 underwent stent placement, 1 underwent a hybrid procedure, and 1 had open fenestration. Full follow-ups (37 ± 21 months) were achieved in 28 patients. Failures to cannulate the true lumen occurred in 8 patients. Among these patients, femoral and brachial approaches were taken in 6 and 2 patients, respectively, and a 2-sided Fisher's exact test revealed no significant differences (P = 0.204). Among the 6 femoral failures, the true lumina were cannulated after conversion to the brachial approach in 3 cases. The perfusion of the distal SMA was not improved until the second stent was distally placed to cover the entire expanded false lumen in 1 case. Numerous branches originating from the false lumen were overlooked in 1 patient and were apparently compromised after stenting. Consequently, the patient died of intestinal necrosis. In a patient with a huge dissecting aneurysm, a stent was misplaced across the false lumen. Fortunately, a remarkable aneurysmal thrombosis formed at 3 months. In a patient who received a hybrid procedure, the stent was occluded at 2 weeks, most likely because the thrombus protruded into the stent. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty in cannulating the true lumen is not uncommon in the endovascular treatment of SIDSMA, and the selection of the arterial approach would benefit from being based on the morphology of the SMA arch. The lengths and branches of the involvement of the false lumen should be evaluated beforehand. Covered stents would be a reasonable option for lumina that contain thrombi.