J Nonhoff1, T Moest2, Christian Martin Schmitt3, T Weisel1, S Bauer1, K A Schlegel3. 1. DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Mannheim, Germany. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen, Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: Tobias.Moest@uk-erlangen.de. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen, Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The animal study aims to evaluate a new experimental model for measuring sole the influence of the surface characteristics independent from implant macro-design on the level of osseointegration by registering the pull-out strength needed for removal of experimental devices with different surfaces from artificial defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two test bodies (36 with the FRIADENT(®) plus surface, 36 with the P15/HAp biofunctionalized surface) were inserted in six adult domestic pigs with artificial calvarial defects. The experimental devices were designed to fit in the defects leaving a gap between the test body and the local bone. After 21 days of healing, the animals were sacrificed and the test bodies were pulled out with a standardised reproducible pull-out device measuring the pull-out strength. The pull-out strength for both groups was compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one days after insertion a mean force of 412 ± 142 N for the P15/HAp group and 183 ± 105 N for the FRIADENT(®) plus group was measured for the removal of the specimens from the calvarial bone. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The experimental set-up seems to be a suitable method when measuring the impact of implant surfaces on the early stage of osseointegration.
OBJECTIVES: The animal study aims to evaluate a new experimental model for measuring sole the influence of the surface characteristics independent from implant macro-design on the level of osseointegration by registering the pull-out strength needed for removal of experimental devices with different surfaces from artificial defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two test bodies (36 with the FRIADENT(®) plus surface, 36 with the P15/HAp biofunctionalized surface) were inserted in six adult domestic pigs with artificial calvarial defects. The experimental devices were designed to fit in the defects leaving a gap between the test body and the local bone. After 21 days of healing, the animals were sacrificed and the test bodies were pulled out with a standardised reproducible pull-out device measuring the pull-out strength. The pull-out strength for both groups was compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one days after insertion a mean force of 412 ± 142 N for the P15/HAp group and 183 ± 105 N for the FRIADENT(®) plus group was measured for the removal of the specimens from the calvarial bone. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The experimental set-up seems to be a suitable method when measuring the impact of implant surfaces on the early stage of osseointegration.
Authors: Sándor Farkasdi; Dávid Pammer; Róbert Rácz; Gergely Hriczó-Koperdák; Bence Tamás Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Beáta Kerémi; József Blazsek; Frederic Cuisinier; Gang Wu; Gábor Varga Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.573