Dorien Kiers1,2,3, Jelle Gerretsen1, Emmy Janssen1, Aaron John1, R Groeneveld1, Johannes G van der Hoeven1,3, Gert-Jan Scheffer2, Peter Pickkers1,3, Matthijs Kox1,2,3. 1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands. 3. Radboud Centre for Infectious Diseases (RCI) Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Oxygen therapy to maintain tissue oxygenation is one of the cornerstones of critical care. Therefore, hyperoxia is often encountered in critically ill patients. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that hyperoxia may affect outcome, although mechanisms are unclear. Immunologic effects might be involved, as hyperoxia was shown to attenuate inflammation and organ damage in preclinical models. However, it remains unclear whether these observations can be ascribed to direct immunosuppressive effects of hyperoxia or to preserved tissue oxygenation. In contrast to these putative anti-inflammatory effects, hyperoxia may elicit an inflammatory response and organ damage in itself, known as oxygen toxicity. Here, we demonstrate that, in the absence of systemic inflammation, short-term hyperoxia (100% O2 for 2.5 hours in mice and 3.5 hours in humans) does not result in increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in both mice and healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we show that, compared with room air, hyperoxia does not affect the systemic inflammatory response elicited by administration of bacterial endotoxin in mice and man. Finally, neutrophil phagocytosis and ROS generation are unaffected by short-term hyperoxia. Our results indicate that hyperoxia does not exert direct anti-inflammatory effects and temper expectations of using it as an immunomodulatory treatment strategy.
Oxygen therapy to maintain tissue oxygenation is one of the cornerstones of critical care. Therefore, hyperoxia is often encountered in critically illpatients. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that hyperoxia may affect outcome, although mechanisms are unclear. Immunologic effects might be involved, as hyperoxia was shown to attenuate inflammation and organ damage in preclinical models. However, it remains unclear whether these observations can be ascribed to direct immunosuppressive effects of hyperoxia or to preserved tissue oxygenation. In contrast to these putative anti-inflammatory effects, hyperoxia may elicit an inflammatory response and organ damage in itself, known as oxygentoxicity. Here, we demonstrate that, in the absence of systemic inflammation, short-term hyperoxia (100% O2 for 2.5 hours in mice and 3.5 hours in humans) does not result in increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in both mice and healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we show that, compared with room air, hyperoxia does not affect the systemic inflammatory response elicited by administration of bacterial endotoxin in mice and man. Finally, neutrophil phagocytosis and ROS generation are unaffected by short-term hyperoxia. Our results indicate that hyperoxia does not exert direct anti-inflammatory effects and temper expectations of using it as an immunomodulatory treatment strategy.
In critically illpatients, the treatment paradigm “treat first what kills
first” emphasizes on the avoidance of hypoxia and liberal oxygen supply is
often the first medical intervention to be initiated, frequently resulting in hyperoxia
at ICU admission1234. A recent meta-analysis of observational
studies revealed an association between hyperoxia at ICU-admission and increased
mortality, albeit this was mainly due to increased mortality in a large subgroup of
patients with cardiac arrest5. On the contrary, hyperoxia might also
exert beneficial effects, for instance as prophylactic treatment for surgical wound
infections, although clinical trials have yielded conflicting results6.
The mechanism through which hyperoxia might exert detrimental or beneficial effects and
contributes to outcome in critically illpatients is largely unclear, but immunologic
effects might play a role. In vitro, short-term hyperoxia was shown to attenuate
cytokine production7, β2-integrin expression necessary for
leukocyte adhesion8, and macrophage phagocytosis and killing9. Furthermore, animal studies have demonstrated that hyperoxia mitigates
the inflammatory response and organ damage after administration of zymosan10 and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)1112. However,
these beneficial effects of hyperoxia in vivo were found 20-48 hours
after the inflammatory insult101112. As such, it remains unclear
whether these were due to direct immunosuppressive effects of hyperoxia, or resulted
from preserved tissue oxygenation during severe hemodynamic instability, thereby
preventing additional tissue damage and subsequent inflammation1314.If hyperoxia has intrinsic anti-inflammatory effects, it could be a promising treatment
option in inflammatory conditions in the ICU, as oxygen is affordable and widely
available. However, evidence of direct immunologic effects of hyperoxia in animals and
humans in vivo is lacking. In addition, there are concerns of oxygentoxicity in
the lungs, characterized by a pulmonary inflammatory response and lung injury1516.In the present study, we investigated the intrinsic immunologic effects of short-term
hyperoxia in the presence and absence of systemic inflammation elicited by
administration of LPS in mice and man, primarily reflected by circulating cytokine
levels. To evaluate possible compartmentalization of immunologic effects of hyperoxia,
we also determined cytokine concentrations in spleen, liver, and lung homogenates in
mice. Furthermore, as hyperoxia has been reported to impair leukocyte functions (e.g.
cytokine production7, phagocytosis and killing9), whole
blood ex vivo cytokine production, neutrophil phagocytosis, and intracellular
generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were assessed in humans.
Results
Effects of hyperoxia during murine endotoxemia
Hyperoxia was well tolerated and did not increase cytokine levels in plasma or
tissue homogenates in placebo-treated mice (Fig. 1). LPS
administration resulted in increased cytokine levels in tissue homogenates, with
the exception of IL-6 in liver, and IL-10 in spleen, liver, and lung
homogenates. Apart from a slight, but statistically significant, reduction in
plasma KC, hyperoxia did not affect LPS-induced cytokine concentrations.
Figure 1
Cytokine concentrations in different compartments in mice.
Plasma, spleen, liver, and lung concentrations of (a)
TNF-α, (b) IL-6, (c) KC, and (d) IL-10
150 minutes after normoxia/hyperoxia (90 minutes
after LPS/placebo administration). Concentrations are represented as
mean ± SEM. *indicates
p < 0.05.
Effects of hyperoxia during experimental human endotoxemia
Demographic characteristics and safety
Demographic characteristics of the subjects are listed in Table 1 and were similar among the groups. Hyperoxia was well
tolerated. No (serious) adverse events occurred during the study.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics.
HYPER
NORM-E
HYPER-E
p
Age [yr)
23 [20–24]
21 [20–23]
21 [20–24]
0.68
Height [cm)
182 [178–184]
185 [180–192]
182 [179–189]
0.60
Weight [kg)
76 [74–84]
75 [69–86]
72 [67–80]
0.61
BMI [kg/m2)
23.8 [22.8-24.8]
22.2 [20.5-24.2]
22.5 [18.8-24.3]
0.28
Data obtained during screening visit and presented as median
[interquartile range]. NORM-E: normoxic endotoxemia,
HYPER-E: hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER: hyperoxia, yr: years;
cm: centimeter, kg: kilogram, BMI: body mass index, m:
meter.
Oxygenation, hemodynamic parameters, temperature, and
symptoms
During the hyperoxic/normoxic period, mean PaO2 was similar in the
hyperoxia group and hyperoxic endotoxemia group
(54.8 ± 3.0
(411.7 ± 22.8) and
54.1 ± 4.1
(405.9 ± 31.1) kPa (mmHg),
p = 0.89), whereas PaO2 in the hyperoxic
endotoxemia group was higher than in the normoxic endotoxemia group
(15.2 ± 0.7
(114.3 ± 5.5) kPa,
p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a).
PaCO2 was 5.0 ± 0.3
(37.8 ± 1.9) kPa in the hyperoxia group,
5.5 ± 0.2
(40.9 ± 1.2) kPa in the hyperoxic
endotoxemia group, and 5.3 ± 0.2
(39.5 ± 1.7) kPa in the normoxic
endotoxemia group (Fig. 2b). After an initial
increase, PaCO2 decreased over time in the hyperoxia group. A
similar pattern was observed in the normoxic endotoxemia and hyperoxic
endotoxemia groups, with no differences between these groups (Fig. 2b). Lactate levels were in the normal range
(<2 mmol/L) throughout the experiment in all subjects. In
all groups, mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased over time, with no
difference between the normoxic and hyperoxic endotoxemia groups (Fig. 2c).
Figure 2
Blood gas parameters, hemodynamics, and temperature in healthy
volunteers.
(a) arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), (b) arterial
carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2), (c) mean arterial
pressure (MAP), (d) heart rate, and (e) tympanic temperature.
The period of hyperoxia or normoxia is indicated with a grey box. In the
endotoxemia groups, LPS was administered at
T = 0 hours. Data are expressed as
mean ± SEM. NORM-E: normoxic
endotoxemia, HYPER-E: hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER: hyperoxia.
In the hyperoxia group, the heart rate gradually increased during the day,
while a pronounced increase was observed in both endotoxemic groups (Fig. 2d). Endotoxemia resulted in a typical increase in
temperature of approximately 1.5 °C (Fig. 2e), and flu-like symptoms (median [IQR] peak symptom
scores 1.5 h after LPS administration of 5.9 [0.81] and 8.7
[1.7] in the normoxic and hyperoxic endotoxemia groups,
p = 0.20), both of which were not influenced by
hyperoxia.
Plasma cytokines
Plasma cytokine concentrations were below the lower detection limit of the
assay at all time-points in the hyperoxia group. LPS administration resulted
in increased plasma concentrations of TNFα, IL-6, IL-8, and
IL-10 in all subjects. No differences between the normoxic and hyperoxic
endotoxemia groups were observed (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Plasma cytokine concentrations in healthy volunteers.
Plasma concentrations of (a) tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α,
(b) interleukin (IL)-6, (c) IL-8 and (d) IL-10. The
period that subjects were fitted with the respiratory helmet and breathed
hyperoxic or normoxic air is indicated with a grey box. In the endotoxemia
groups, LPS was administered at
T = 0 hours. Data are expressed as
median with interquartile range. NORM-E: normoxic endotoxemia, HYPER-E:
hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER: hyperoxia.
Circulating leukocytes
Numbers of circulating neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes changed
significantly, but to no clinically relevant extent, over time in the
hyperoxia group (Fig. 4). LPS administration typically
resulted in neutrophilia, with transient lympho- and monocytopenia.
Hyperoxia did not affect LPS-induced changes in any of the leukocyte
subsets.
Figure 4
Circulating leukocytes in healthy volunteers.
Numbers of circulating (a) neutrophils, (b) monocytes and
(c) lymphocytes. The period that subjects were fitted with the
respiratory helmet and breathed hyperoxic or normoxic air is indicated with
a grey box. In the endotoxemia groups, LPS was administered at
T = 0 hours. Data are expressed as
mean ± SEM NORM-E: normoxic endotoxemia,
HYPER-E: hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER: hyperoxia.
Ex vivo cytokine production
In the hyperoxia group, ex vivo production of TNFα was
slightly increased at several time-points, but no clear relationship with
the period of hyperoxia was evident (Fig. 5a).
Furthermore, IL-6 production was unaffected (Fig. 5b).
As circulating monocytes decrease during endotoxemia, ex vivo
cytokine production could not be assessed one to three hours after LPS
administration. As expected, in both endotoxemic groups leukocyte cytokine
production capacity was blunted four and eight hours after
LPS-administration due to endotoxin tolerance, which fully recovered the
subsequent day. There were no differences in ex vivo cytokine
production between the normoxic and hyperoxic endotoxemia groups.
Figure 5
Ex vivo whole blood stimulation in healthy volunteers.
(a) Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α and (b)
interleukin (IL)-6 cytokine production in whole blood stimulated ex
vivo with LPS. Data are expressed as median with interquartile
range. NORM-E: normoxic endotoxemia, HYPER-E: hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER:
hyperoxia.
Neutrophil phagocytosis and ROS generation
Neutrophil phagocytosis was similar in the normoxic and hyperoxic endotoxemia
groups, with no clear changes over time following LPS administration (Fig. 6a). Intracellular ROS generation was not affected
in the hyperoxia group at any time-point. Also, no differences were observed
between both endotoxemic groups (Fig. 6b).
Figure 6
Neutrophil phagocytosis and ROS generation in healthy volunteers.
(a) Neutrophil phagocytic index and (b) neutrophil
intracellular ROS generation. Data are expressed as
mean ± SEM. NORM-E: normoxic
endotoxemia, HYPER-E: hyperoxic endotoxemia, HYPER: hyperoxia.
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrate that short-term hyperoxia neither induces
increased levels of cytokines in itself, nor modulates the cytokine response during
systemic inflammation induced by endotoxin administration in mice and healthy
volunteers. In addition, both in the presence and absence of systemic inflammation
in humans, no relevant effects of short-term hyperoxia were observed on temperature,
flu-like symptoms, leukocyte counts, ex vivo whole blood cytokine production,
neutrophil phagocytosis, and neutrophil ROS generation. To the best of our
knowledge, we are the first to investigate the intrinsic immunomodulatory effects of
hyperoxia in a standardized and well-controlled model of systemic inflammation in
humans in vivo.Our findings appear to be in contrast with previous animal studies reporting
anti-inflammatory effects of hyperoxia during systemic inflammation. Although
exposure to 100% oxygen for 20 hours or to 70% oxygen for
48 hours did not affect plasma TNFα levels after CLP in
rats, intermittent exposure to 100% oxygen for 6 hours per day reduced
plasma TNFα concentrations12. Similarly, intermittent
hyperoxia for 2–3 hours attenuated plasma TNFα
and IL-6 levels 24 hours after zymosan administration in mice10. Paradoxically, the same authors showed that both shorter and longer
exposure to 100% oxygen nullified the anti-inflammatory effects, without a clear
explanation10. The discrepant results between these studies and
ours might be explained by the use of more prolonged and severe models of
inflammation. Prolonged inflammation may lead to a vicious cycle by causing tissue
hypoxia, which subsequently results in the release of danger associated molecular
patterns (DAMPs), in turn leading to aggravation of the inflammatory response17. Along these lines, in animal models of severe sepsis and septic
shock, hyperoxia was shown to improve tissue oxygenation and organ function,
ultimately resulting in better survival1819. Therefore, the
previously observed beneficial effects of hyperoxia on systemic inflammation might
be attributable to the prevention of tissue hypoxia and therefore interruption of
the vicious cycle, rather than intrinsic immunosuppressive effects. The short-term
murineendotoxemia model used in the present study is very unlikely to have resulted
in tissue hypoxia, and the humanendotoxemia model is naturally too mild to cause
significant hemodynamic instability and tissue hypoxia.Human in vivo studies on the effects of hyperoxia on the inflammatory response
are scarce, and have mainly been performed in the perioperative setting. In a trial
in patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery, a perioperative FiO2 of
80% resulted in decreased levels of postoperative plasma C-reactive protein,
IL-1β, and IL-6 compared with a FiO2 of 30%. The authors
suggest that hyperoxia prevented wound hypoxia and consequently attenuated
inflammation20. In contrast, hyperoxic ventilation in coronary
artery bypass graft surgery resulted in a small, but significant, increase in plasma
IL-6 on the first postoperative day21. However, this could not be
reproduced in an identical study performed by the same group, where hyperoxia did
not affect postoperative plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, TNFα,
IL-1a, IL-1β, and IL-1022. A number of randomized
clinical trials have been conducted investigating perioperative hyperoxia as a means
to prevent surgical site infections. Meta-analyses of these studies report a slight
beneficial effect in e.g. colorectal surgery623.Although in vitro, hyperoxia has been shown to enhance LPS-induced whole blood
cytokine production7, we now demonstrate that hyperoxia in
vivo does not affect ex vivo whole blood cytokine responses. As such,
the present findings suggest that hyperoxia in vivo does not result in
(lasting) leukocyte reprogramming that modifies cytokine production capacity.
Previous studies have also described that hyperoxia inhibits phagocytosis of
alveolar macrophages in vitro9 and in vivo in mice24, whereas neutrophil phagocytosis and ROS generation was shown to be
enhanced in vitro25. In contrast, ex vivo neutrophil
ROS generation and phagocytosis remained unaffected after exposure of healthy
volunteers to hyperbaric hyperoxia26, which is in agreement with our
findings. Taken together, these results suggest that the effects of hyperoxia on
phagocytosis and killing is highly cell-type specific.The absence of immunomodulatory effects of hyperoxia in the present study tempers
expectations of utilizing therapeutic hyperoxia in acute inflammation. In addition,
the concept of therapeutic hyperoxia requires cautious consideration for several
other reasons.First, an important drawback is the risk of oxygen toxicity27. The
lungs, being the gas exchange interface, are at the greatest risk of
hyperoxia-induced injury15. Pulmonary oxygentoxicity ultimately
resembles the clinical and pathological characteristics of ARDS27, as
demonstrated in mice exposed to 100% oxygen for up to 48 hours16. These mice developed neutrophil infiltration and increased IL-6 and
TNFα levels in the bronchial alveolar lavage fluid within
12 hours, followed by alveolar congestion, wall thickening, and
hemorrhage16. Other animal studies have shown that especially in
acute lung injury, high FiO2 levels are detrimental as well28. The current study was not primarily designed to assess oxygentoxicity, as this has only been described after long-term hyperoxia242829. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that short-term hyperoxia
neither causes pulmonary inflammation in itself, nor does it aggravate the pulmonary
inflammatory response induced by systemic LPS administration in mice.A second concern is related to possible hemodynamic effects of hyperoxia, as it was
shown to induce vasoconstriction and hence reduced tissue blood flow3031 as well as reduced coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen
consumption32 in humans. Although we did not observe an effect of
hyperoxia on gross hemodynamic parameters during humanendotoxemia, we did not
assess regional blood flow, oxygen consumption, or vascular resistance. Currently,
the net effects of hyperoxia on hemodynamic parameters and oxygen delivery in
patients with sepsis are unknown.Finally, hyperoxia at ICU admission was shown to be associated with increased
mortality in a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies5, which
might be related to the issues raised in the previous points. Of note, this overall
effect might be attributed to a large subgroup of cardiac arrestpatients in the
meta-analysis, in whom hyperoxia has obvious detrimental effects. Naturally,
physicians may be tempted to treat the most severely ill patients with a higher
FiO2, therefore, hyperoxia could represent a confounding factor
instead of a direct cause of increased mortality in these observational studies.This study has several strengths. First, results obtained in animals were confirmed
in a human in vivo model of systemic inflammation. This is important, as the
acute inflammatory response in human and animal models may differ considerably33. Second, it is unlikely that tissue oxygenation was compromised in
our experiments. Therefore, conclusions can be drawn about the intrinsic effect of
hyperoxia on the inflammatory response, without interference of tissue hypoxia
effects or (other) alterations that might emerge during long periods of hyperoxia.
Nevertheless, endotoxemia models do not reflect all aspects of the complex systemic
inflammatory response encountered in many critically illpatients. Therefore, the
effects of oxygenation on outcome in systemically inflamed ICU patients remain to be
determined. Data from a recently preliminary terminated clinical trial in which
sepsispatients were randomized to either hyperoxia or normoxia and hypertonic or
isotonic saline in a 2 × 2 factorial design
(HYPER2S, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01722422), and an ongoing study on
liberal versus restrictive oxygenation in ICU patients with systemic inflammation
(O2-ICU ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02321072) will hopefully answer this
important question.In conclusion, short-term hyperoxia does not affect the inflammatory response induced
by administration of endotoxin in mice and man. These results indicate that
hyperoxia does not exert direct anti-inflammatory effects, and suggest that the
previously reported beneficial effects in animal models of more prolonged and severe
inflammation are due to preserved tissue oxygenation. Our data tempers expectations
of using hyperoxia as an immunomodulatory treatment strategy in patients.
Intervention studies in patients are ongoing and are expected to provide evidence
for tailoring oxygenation in critically illpatients.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All procedures were in accordance with the requirements of the Dutch
Experiments on Animals Act, the EC Directive 86/609 and approved by the
Animal Ethics Committee of the Radboud University Medical Centre. A total of
32 male Balb/c mice (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.,
L’Arbresle Cedex, France), aged six to eight weeks were
used.
Reagents
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, E. Coli, serotype 0111:B4) was obtained from
Sigma–Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA), dissolved in sterile 0.9%
NaCl, and administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 5 mg/kg.
Sterile 0.9% NaCl was used as placebo.
Experimental protocol
Mice were randomized into four groups (n = 8 per
group); 1. normoxia-placebo. 2. normoxia-LPS. 3. hyperoxia-placebo. 4.
hyperoxia-LPS. One hour before LPS/ placebo administration, mice were placed
in an airtight cage with a continuous airflow of room air (21% oxygen,
normoxia) or 100% oxygen (hyperoxia) to ensure a hyperoxic state during the
initiation of inflammation. Ninety minutes after LPS/ placebo
administration, when plasma levels of the archetypal pro-inflammatory
cytokine TNFα (primary endpoint) reach their maximum3435, mice were sacrificed by exsanguination through orbita
extraction under deep isoflurane anesthesia. Blood was collected in
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing tubes (MiniCollect,
Greiner bio-one, Alphen a/d Rijn, the Netherlands), centrifuged
(14000 g, 5 minutes, room temperature), and plasma
was stored at −80°C until batch-wise analysis.
Liver, spleen, and lungs were snap-frozen and stored at −80
°C until further analysis.
Cytokine analysis
Liver, spleen, and lung tissue was homogenized for 5 minutes at
50 Hz in Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (Life Technologies,
Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) containing protease inhibitors (complete
EDTA-free tablets, Roche, Woerden, The Netherlands) using a Tissuelyzer LT
instrument and 5 mm stainless steel beads (both from Qiagen,
Venlo, the Netherlands Plasma and tissue homogenate concentrations of Tumor
Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6,keratinocyte-derived
chemokine (KC, murine homologue of IL-8), and IL-10 were measured batch-wise
using a Luminex assay (detection range
32–1000000 pg/mL) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (Milliplex, Merck Millipore,
Billerica, MA, USA). Tissue cytokine concentrations were normalized to total
protein content determined by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA Protein Assay,
Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands).
Subjects and study design
Data was obtained from two larger trials on immunologic effects of
oxygenation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01889823 and NCT01978158).
Experiments were in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. After
approval from the local ethics committee of the Radboud University Medical
Center, 30 healthy male volunteers gave written informed consent to
participate in the study. Subjects were screened before participation and
had a normal physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine
laboratory values. Subjects with febrile illness two weeks before the
experiment, use of prescription drugs, or history of vagal collapse were
excluded. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase was
designed to assess safety, feasibility, and immunologic effects of hyperoxia
in the absence of systemic inflammation. In these experiments, 10 subjects
were exposed to hyperoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] of
100%) using an air-tight respiratory helmet (CaStar, StarMed, Italy) for
3.5 hours. In the second phase, 20 subjects participated in
endotoxemia experiments: they were randomized to either hyperoxia (as above,
hyperoxic endotoxemia group, n = 10), or normoxia
(FiO2 of 21% using the same respiratory helmet, normoxic
endotoxemia group, n = 10). The period of hyperoxic
exposure was chosen to assure a hyperoxic state at the initiation of the
inflammatory response and throughout its acute phase, during which most
inflammatory cytokines reach their maximum levels3637.
Apart from LPS administration, study protocols of the two phases were
identical.
Study procedures
Experiments were conducted at the research unit of the intensive care
department. Subjects refrained from caffeine and alcohol
24 hours before the experiment, and refrained from any intake of
food and drinks 10 hours before the experiment. A venous and
arterial cannula were placed for hydration, arterial blood pressure
monitoring, and blood withdrawal. Heart rate was recorded with a three-lead
electrocardiogram and peripheral saturation was measured using pulse
oximetry. Hemodynamic data were recorded from a Philips MP50 patient monitor
every 30 seconds using an in-house developed system. Every
30 minutes, temperature was measured using a tympanic
thermometer (FirstTemp Genius 2; Covidien, Dublin, Ireland), and flu-like
symptoms (headache, nausea, shivering, muscle and back pain) were scored on
a six-point scale (0 = no symptoms,
5 = worst ever experienced), resulting in a total
symptom score of 0–25.After baseline measurements
(t = −1 h), subjects were
fitted with the respiratory helmet and normoxia or hyperoxia was initiated.
The inflowing gas composition and the gas composition within the helmet were
continuously monitored (%O2 and %CO2) using gas
analyzers (Philips Airway Gases analyser M1026A, Philips Medical Systems,
Boebligen, Germany) connected to patient monitors (Hewlett Packard Model
M1166A 68S, Geneva, Switzerland and Capnomac Ultima, DATEX-OHMED, Helsinki,
Finland). To prevent carbon dioxide build up, airflow was titrated to assure
an inspiratory CO2 < 1%. One hour
after initiation of normoxia or hyperoxia
(t = 0 h), purified LPS (US Standard
Reference Endotoxin Escherichia Coli O:113) obtained from the Pharmaceutical
Development Section of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA)
was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 ng/kg in both
endotoxemia groups. After 3.5 hours of normoxia or hyperoxia
(t = 2.5 h), the helmet was removed and
all subjects breathed room air for the rest of the experiment.
Blood gas parameters, lactate, and leukocyte counts
Blood gas parameters and lactate were analyzed in lithium heparin
(LH)-anticoagulated arterial blood immediately after withdrawal using CG4+
cartridges and an i-STAT blood gas analyzer (Abbott, Libertyville, IL, USA).
Analysis of leukocyte counts and differentiation was performed in
EDTA-anticoagulated blood using routine patient sample analysis methods
(flow cytometric analysis on a Sysmex XE-5000,The Netherlands).
Plasma cytokine concentrations and ex vivo whole blood
stimulation
EDTA-anticoagulated blood was centrifuged immediately after withdrawal
(2000 g, 10 minutes, 4 °C)
and plasma was stored at −80 °C until
analysis. “Concentrations of TNFα, IL-6, IL-8, and
IL-10 were analyzed batch-wise using a Luminex assay (detection range
3.2-10000 pg/mL) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions (Milliplex, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).”
Leukocyte cytokine production capacity was assessed by ex vivo whole
blood LPS stimulation using an in-house developed system38.
Briefly, 0.5 mL LH-anticoagulated blood was added to pre-filled
tubes with 2 mL culture medium or 2 mL culture
medium supplemented with 12.5 ng/mL LPS (final LPS
concentration: 10 ng/mL). After 24 hours of
incubation at 37 °C, samples were centrifuged, and
supernatants were stored at −80 °C until
batch-wise analysis. Concentrations of TNFα and IL-6 were
determined using ELISA according to the manufacturer’s
instructions (Duoset, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cytokine
concentrations were normalized to monocyte counts (the main
cytokine-producing cells in whole blood stimulation assays39).
Neutrophil phagocytosis assay
Neutrophil phagocytosis was measured using the pHrodo Red E. coli
BioParticles Phagocytosis Kit for Flow Cytometry according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, the
Netherlands). Briefly, 100 μL LH-anticoagulated
blood was incubated with pHrodo Red E. coli BioParticles for
15 minutes (at 37 °C or on ice).
Thereafter, erythrocytes were lysed, the leukocyte pellet was washed and
stored in 1% paraformaldehyde solution. Analysis was performed using a
Cytomics FC500 flow cytometer and Kaluza Analysis Software (both from
Beckman Coulter; Galway, Ireland). Neutrophils were gated based on forward
and side scatter characteristics. Using the samples incubated on ice as
negative control, the percentage pHrodo-positive neutrophils in the
phycoerythrin channel was determined. Phagocytic index was calculated as the
percentage of pHrodo-positive neutrophils multiplied by the Mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the pHrodo-positive neutrophil
population.
Neutrophil intracellular ROS generation
Neutrophil ROS generation was quantified using
2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma,
St Louis, MO, USA), as described previously40. Briefly,
LH-anticoagulated blood was incubated with 0.06 mM DCFH-DA
(30 minutes, 3 °C, 400 rpm),
the reaction was stopped with 3 mM EDTA, and samples were
centrifuged (430 g, 5 minutes,
4 °C). Erythrocytes were lysed (BD Pharm Lyse,
Beckton Dickinson, Breda, the Netherlands) and cells were washed, after
which the leukocyte pellet was resuspended in 3 mM EDTA solution
and stored overnight at 4°, as pilot work showed that
fluorescence remains stable overnight using this method. Analysis was
performed the following day using a Cytomics FC500 flow cytometer and Kaluza
Analysis Software (both from Beckman Coulter; Galway, Ireland). Pilot
studies have shown that the fluorescence remains stable when stored
overNeutrophils were gated based on forward and side scatter
characteristics, and ROS generation was quantified by determining the mean
fluorescence of the neutrophil population. ROS generation was normalized to
baseline levels
(t = −1 h).
Calculations and statistical analysis
Data are expressed as median [interquartile range] or
mean ± SEM based on their distribution
(calculated by Shapiro-Wilk tests). Except for demographic characteristics,
all non-parametric data were log-transformed before statistical analysis.
Differences between groups in the murine experiments and between-group
differences in mean PaO2, peak levels of flu-like symptoms, and
demographic characteristics in humans were evaluated using unpaired
Student’s t-tests or Kruskall-Wallis tests. Within-group
differences over time in the hyperoxia group were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA). Two-way ANOVA (interaction term) was used to
assess differences between endotoxemic groups over time. A p-value
of < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism
version 5.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kiers, D. et al. Short-term hyperoxia does
not exert immunologic effects during experimental murine and humanendotoxemia.
Sci. Rep.
5, 17441; doi: 10.1038/srep17441 (2015).
Authors: Motaz Qadan; Christopher Battista; Sarah A Gardner; Gary Anderson; Ozan Akca; Hiram C Polk Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Patrick Lauscher; Harry Kertscho; Anne Meissner; Kai Zacharowski; Oliver Habler; Jens Meier Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: J Hope Kilgannon; Alan E Jones; Nathan I Shapiro; Mark G Angelos; Barry Milcarek; Krystal Hunter; Joseph E Parrillo; Stephen Trzeciak Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-06-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Balázs Hauser; Eberhard Barth; Gabriele Bassi; Florian Simon; Michael Gröger; Sükrü Oter; Günter Speit; Franz Ploner; Peter Möller; Ulrich Wachter; Josef A Vogt; Martin Matejovic; Enrico Calzia; Michael Georgieff; Peter Radermacher; Dirk M Maybauer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Aafke Elizabeth de Graaff; Dave Anton Dongelmans; Jan Maria Binnekade; Evert de Jonge Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; Glenn M Eastwood; Alistair Nichol; David Pilcher; Graeme K Hart; Michael C Reade; Moritoki Egi; D James Cooper Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Hendrik J F Helmerhorst; Laura R A Schouten; Gerry T M Wagenaar; Nicole P Juffermans; Joris J T H Roelofs; Marcus J Schultz; Evert de Jonge; David J van Westerloo Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2017-05-26
Authors: Martin Hoenigl; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Masato Nakazawa; Michelli Faria de Oliveira; Yonglong Zhang; Malcolm A Finkelman; Scott Letendre; Davey Smith; Sara Gianella Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Christian Reiterer; Barbara Kabon; Markus Falkner von Sonnenburg; Patrick Starlinger; Alexander Taschner; Oliver Zotti; Julius Goshin; Gregor Drlicek; Edith Fleischmann Journal: Trials Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 2.279