Literature DB >> 26616011

Comparison study of distinguishing cancerous and normal prostate epithelial cells by confocal and polarization diffraction imaging.

Wenhuan Jiang1, Jun Qing Lu1, Li V Yang2, Yu Sa3, Yuanming Feng3, Junhua Ding4, Xin-Hua Hu1.   

Abstract

Accurate classification of malignant cells from benign ones can significantly enhance cancer diagnosis and prognosis by detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). We have investigated two approaches of quantitative morphology and polarization diffraction imaging on two prostate cell types to evaluate their feasibility as single-cell assay methods toward CTC detection after cell enrichment. The two cell types have been measured by a confocal imaging method to obtain their three-dimensional morphology parameters and by a polarization diffraction imaging flow cytometry (p-DIFC) method to obtain image texture parameters. The support vector machine algorithm was applied to examine the accuracy of cell classification with the morphology and diffraction image parameters. Despite larger mean values of cell and nuclear sizes of the cancerous prostate cells than the normal ones, it has been shown that the morphologic parameters cannot serve as effective classifiers. In contrast, accurate classification of the two prostate cell types can be achieved with high classification accuracies on measured data acquired separately in three measurements. These results provide strong evidence that the p-DIFC method has the potential to yield morphology-related “fingerprints” for accurate and label-free classification of the two prostate cell types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26616011     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.7.071102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  19 in total

1.  Particle classification from light scattering with the scanning flow cytometer.

Authors:  A N Shvalov; I V Surovtsev; A V Chernyshev; J T Soini; V P Maltsev
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1999-11-01

2.  Angular distribution of light scattered by single biological cells and oriented particle agglomerates.

Authors:  Jörg Neukammer; Carsten Gohlke; Andreas Höpe; Thomas Wessel; Herbert Rinneberg
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Simulations of light scattering from a biconcave red blood cell using the finite-difference time-domain method.

Authors:  Jun Q Lu; Ping Yang; Xin-Hua Hu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Study of low speed flow cytometry for diffraction imaging with different chamber and nozzle designs.

Authors:  Yu Sa; Yuanming Feng; Kenneth M Jacobs; Jun Yang; Ran Pan; Ioannis Gkigkitzis; Jun Q Lu; Xin-Hua Hu
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Analysis of cellular objects through diffraction images acquired by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Yuanming Feng; Marina S Moran; Jun Q Lu; Li V Yang; Yu Sa; Ning Zhang; Lixue Dong; Xin-Hua Hu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Patrick J Bastian; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Theodor van der Kwast; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Thomas Wiegel; F Zattoni; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Polarization imaging and classification of Jurkat T and Ramos B cells using a flow cytometer.

Authors:  Yuanming Feng; Ning Zhang; Kenneth M Jacobs; Wenhuan Jiang; Li V Yang; Zhigang Li; Jun Zhang; Jun Q Lu; Xin-Hua Hu
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 8.  Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Circulating tumor cell counts are prognostic of overall survival in SWOG S0421: a phase III trial of docetaxel with or without atrasentan for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amir Goldkorn; Benjamin Ely; David I Quinn; Catherine M Tangen; Louis M Fink; Tong Xu; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Peter J Van Veldhuizen; Neeraj Agarwal; Michael A Carducci; J Paul Monk; Ram H Datar; Mark Garzotto; Philip C Mack; Primo Lara; Celestia S Higano; Maha Hussain; Ian Murchie Thompson; Richard J Cote; Nicholas J Vogelzang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  Sensitive capture of circulating tumour cells by functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets.

Authors:  Hyeun Joong Yoon; Tae Hyun Kim; Zhuo Zhang; Ebrahim Azizi; Trinh M Pham; Costanza Paoletti; Jules Lin; Nithya Ramnath; Max S Wicha; Daniel F Hayes; Diane M Simeone; Sunitha Nagrath
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Types of spectroscopy and microscopy techniques for cancer diagnosis: a review.

Authors:  Sindhoora Kaniyala Melanthota; Yury V Kistenev; Ekaterina Borisova; Deyan Ivanov; Olga Zakharova; Andrey Boyko; Denis Vrazhnov; Dharshini Gopal; Shweta Chakrabarti; Shama Prasada K; Nirmal Mazumder
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.555

2.  Quantitative analysis and comparison of 3D morphology between viable and apoptotic MCF-7 breast cancer cells and characterization of nuclear fragmentation.

Authors:  Yuhua Wen; Zhan Chen; Jianfen Lu; Elizabeth Ables; Jean-Luc Scemama; Li V Yang; Jun Q Lu; Xin-Hua Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.