| Literature DB >> 26615976 |
Emily LeRoux-Rutledge1, Madeleine A Guerlain1, Louise B Andersen1, Claudius Madanhire2, Alice Mutsikiwa2, Constance Nyamukapa2,3, Morten Skovdal4, Simon Gregson2,3, Catherine Campbell1.
Abstract
This study examines whether children in rural Zimbabwe have differing representations of their HIV/AIDS-affected peers based on the gender of those peers. A group of 128 children (58 boys, 70 girls) aged 10-14 participated in a draw-and-write exercise, in which they were asked to tell the story of either an HIV/AIDS-affected girl child, or an HIV/AIDS-affected boy child. Stories were inductively thematically coded, and then a post hoc statistical analysis was conducted to see if there were differences in the themes that emerged in stories about girls versus stories about boys. The results showed that boys were more often depicted as materially deprived, without adult and teacher support, and heavily burdened with household duties. Further research is needed to determine whether the perceptions of the children in this study point to a series of overlooked challenges facing HIV/AIDS-affected boys, or to a culture of gender inequality facing HIV/AIDS-affected girls - which pays more attention to male suffering than to female suffering.Entities:
Keywords: HIV/AIDS; Zimbabwe; children; coping; gender; suffering
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26615976 PMCID: PMC4706015 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1093592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Care ISSN: 0954-0121
Coding frame.
| Global themes | Organising themes | Basic themes |
|---|---|---|
| Character narratives of HIV/AIDS-affected children | Children as victims | Express sympathy and pity for child |
| Positive representations of child | (Intelligent, likeable, beautiful, responsible, hard-working, obedient, good in school, morally good) | |
| Children as morally problematic | Child associated with ‘Bad behaviour’ (promiscuous, alcohol, foolish) | |
| Representations of the life situation of HIV/AIDS-affected children | Representations of HIV/AIDS-affected households | Household looks visibly poor (dirty, dying flowers, lack of basic essentials, dying animals) Positive physical appearance of household (beautiful, clean, livestock) |
| Representations of the parents of HIV/AIDS-affected children | AIDS visible through behaviour & condition of parents (sleeping, unable to work, hospital visits, look sick) Limited supportive adults in household (evident in lack of social, emotional or economic support) | |
| Representations of social circumstances in the homes of HIV/AIDS-affected children | Children neglected/abused/seen as burdens in their households Children receiving social support in their households | |
| Duties of HIV/AIDS-affected children | Child engaged in caregiving activities (intimate nursing, bathing, administrating medicine, feeding) Child engaged in household duties Child's duties as exploitation by relatives Duties carried out by a child lacking food Duties carried out by sick child Duties compromise safety and well-being of the child Duties hinder child from social engagement (playing) Child engaged in income-generating activities | |
| Community responses to HIV/AIDS-affected children | Extended family support Community supports HIV/AIDS-affected child Community responds negatively to HIV/AIDS-affected child | |
| How challenges of HIV/AIDS-affected children manifest within the school environment | Impact on school attendance | School drop out Late for school |
| Material deprivation | Lack of school equipment (uniform, pens, books, fees) Lack of food (comes to school without eating) Child looks visibly poor (poor clothing, dirty, rags, torn clothes) | |
| Physical health | Child shows symptoms of poor physical health (pain, tiredness, fainting, sleeping, vomiting) Child looks visibly sick (cracked lips, skinny) Child visits hospital/health clinics | |
| Emotional health | Child shows symptoms of poor emotional health (sad, crying, fear, worry about home situation, miserable, stressed) | |
| School as a negative context for HIV/AIDS-affected children | Teachers' negative responses to HIV/AIDS-affected children | Teacher sends child away from school Teacher abuses child |
| Social exclusion | Child experience social exclusion (isolation, lack of friends) Child experience bullying Child stigmatized | |
| School as a source of positive support | Teachers (including school and head master) support beyond education | Teachers as guardians (emotional/counselling/advice/comfort) Teachers provide material support (pens, books, fees, uniform/clothes, soap) Teacher assists with food/water Teacher encourages inclusion of HIV/AIDS-affected children Other – not specified School aware of home situation of child |
| Peer support | Peers share materials (pens, books) Peers share food Peer interaction and emotional support Peers help with chores | |
| Bridges between schools and outside sources of support | School spaces as platform for referral to health clinics NGOs BEAM Chiedza | |
| Routes to positive social identities | Schools as distraction from life tragedies (happy, forget home situation) Positive perceptions of children's school performance | |
| Extra coding | Perceptions of HIV/AIDS | Contagion of HIV ART HIV perceived as ‘killer disease’ |
Differences in prevalence of organising theme according to sex of child described.
| Organising themes | Male described | Female described | Chi-squared value | Degrees of freedom | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39% | 23% | 3.855 | 1 | .050a |
| 87% | 70% | 5.663 | 1 | .017a |
| 21% | 42% | 6.760 | 1 | .009a |
| 53% | 17% | 18.941 | 1 | <.000b |
aSignificant at the 5% significance level pre-Bonferonni correction (critical p-value .05).
bSignificant at the 5% significance level post-Bonferonni correction (critical p-value .001).
Figure 1. Type of support received from teacher and/or school, by gender.