Literature DB >> 26615965

Elective induction of labour and maternal request: a national population-based study.

B Coulm1, B Blondel1, S Alexander2, M Boulvain3, C Le Ray1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of elective inductions in France and the proportion of them that were maternally requested, and to study the factors associated with elective inductions that were or were not requested by women.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study.
SETTING: All maternity units in France. POPULATION: About 14 681 women from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey of a representative sample of births.
METHODS: Inductions were classified as elective based on their indications and maternal and fetal characteristics, collected from medical records. Elective inductions requested by women were identified from the mother's postpartum interviews. Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to study the determinants of inductions that were or were not maternally requested. Women with spontaneous labour served as the comparison group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of elective inductions.
RESULTS: The induction rate was 22.6, 13.9% elective. Among elective inductions, 47.3% were requested by women. The characteristics of mothers, pregnancies, and maternity units were similar in both groups of elective inductions. The main associated factors were parity 2 or more [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-7.2 for maternally requested inductions and aOR of 1.8 (95% CI1.2-2.7) for unrequested inductions, compared with parity 0] and private hospital status [aOR 4.5 95% (CI 3.3-6.0) for maternally requested inductions and aOR 3.7 (95% CI 2.8-4.9) for inductions not requested by the mother]. We found no association between maternal social characteristics and type of elective induction.
CONCLUSION: Parity and organisational factors appear to influence the decision about elective inductions. It would be interesting to determine how obstetricians and women make this decision and for what reasons. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: About 13.9% of inductions of labour were elective in France, 47.3% of these requested by women.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Determinants; France; elective; induction of labour; maternal request

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26615965     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

1.  Travel Time to Hospital for Childbirth: Comparing Calculated Versus Reported Travel Times in France.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Caroline Prunet; Béatrice Blondel; Hélène Charreire; Evelyne Combier; Marc Le Vaillant; Jeanne-Marie Amat-Roze; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-01

2.  Elective induction of labor: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Malin Dögl; Pål Romundstad; Line Dahlgaard Berntzen; Oliv Camilla Fremgaarden; Katrine Kirial; Anne Molne Kjøllesdal; Benedicte S Nygaard; Line Robberstad; Thorbjørn Steen; Christian Tappert; Cecilie Fredvik Torkildsen; Magdalena R Vaernesbranden; Alexander Vietheer; Runa Heimstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence-based Birth Attendance in Spain: Private versus Public Centers.

Authors:  Antonio Hernández-Martínez; Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Julián Rodríguez-Almagro; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Juan Gómez-Salgado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Recent advances in the induction of labor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-30

5.  Are risk factors for preterm and early-term live singleton birth the same? A population-based study in France.

Authors:  Marie Delnord; Béatrice Blondel; Caroline Prunet; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Early-term birth and its association with universal two-child policy: a national cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Gareth J Williams; Guanghua Wang; Jingjing Chen; Mengyu Zhang; Wenchong Du; Jing Zhu; Jun Zhang; Jing Hua
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.