Literature DB >> 26615874

How can we improve teaching of ECG interpretation skills? Findings from a prospective randomised trial.

T Raupach1, S Harendza2, S Anders3, N Schuelper4, J Brown5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate on how ECG interpretation should be taught during undergraduate medical training. This study addressed the impact of teaching format, examination consequences and student motivation on skills retention.
METHODS: A total of 493 fourth-year medical students participated in a six-group, partially randomised trial. Students received three levels of teaching intensity: self-directed learning (2 groups), lectures (2 groups) or small-group peer-teaching (2 groups). On each level of teaching intensity, end-of-course written examinations (ECG exit exam) were summative in one group and formative in the other. Learning outcome was assessed in a retention test two months later.
RESULTS: Retention test scores were predicted by summative assessments (adjusted beta 4.08; 95% CI 1.39-6.78) but not by the type of teaching. Overall performance levels and motivation did not predict performance decrease or skills retention.
CONCLUSIONS: Summative assessments increase medium-term retention of ECG interpretation skills, irrespective of instructional format.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Decrease; Electrocardiogram; Forgetting; Learning; Medical education; Teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26615874     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  9 in total

1.  What We Do and Do Not Know about Teaching Medical Image Interpretation.

Authors:  Ellen M Kok; Koos van Geel; Jeroen J G van Merriënboer; Simon G F Robben
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-03

2.  Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence among medical students and residents? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charle André Viljoen; Rob Scott Millar; Mark E Engel; Mary Shelton; Vanessa Burch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A qualitative study on the development and rectification of advanced medical students' misconceptions about the physiological electrocardiogram (ECG).

Authors:  Mathias Trauschke
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-15

4.  Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students.

Authors:  Hosein Habibzadeh; Alireza Rahmani; Bahlol Rahimi; Soheila Ahangarzadeh Rezai; Nader Aghakhani; Fariba Hosseinzadegan
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2019-10-24

5.  A comparison between peer-assisted learning and self-study for electrocardiography interpretation in Thai medical students.

Authors:  Jakrin Kewcharoen; Nattawat Charoenpoonsiri; Sittinun Thangjui; Sowitchaya Panthong; Wasana Hongkan
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2020-01

6.  ECG Patient Simulator Based on Mathematical Models.

Authors:  Mario Alan Quiroz-Juárez; Juan Alberto Rosales-Juárez; Omar Jiménez-Ramírez; Rubén Vázquez-Medina; José Luis Aragón
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of SAFMEDS to produce fluency in interpretation of electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Louise Rabbitt; Dara Byrne; Paul O'Connor; Miroslawa Gorecka; Alan Jacobsen; Sinéad Lydon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence amongst medical students and residents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charle André Viljoen; Rob Scott Millar; Mark E Engel; Mary Shelton; Vanessa Burch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Determining electrocardiography training priorities for medical students using a modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Charle André Viljoen; Rob Scott Millar; Kathryn Manning; Vanessa Celeste Burch
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.