Literature DB >> 26615690

Benchmark of Electronically Excited States for Semiempirical Methods: MNDO, AM1, PM3, OM1, OM2, OM3, INDO/S, and INDO/S2.

Mario R Silva-Junior1, Walter Thiel1.   

Abstract

Semiempirical configuration interaction (CI) calculations with eight different Hamiltonians are reported for a recently proposed benchmark set of 28 medium-sized organic molecules. Vertical excitation energies and one-electron properties are computed using the same geometries as in our previous ab initio benchmark study on electronically excited states. The CI calculations for the standard methods (MNDO, AM1, PM3) and for the orthogonalization-corrected methods (OM1, OM2, OM3) include single, double, triple, and quadruple excitations (CISDTQ) using the graphical unitary group approach (GUGA) as implemented in the MNDO code. The CIS calculations for the established INDO/S method and the reparametrized INDO/S2 variant employ a modified version of the ZINDO program. As compared to the best theoretical reference data from the ab initio benchmark, all currently applied semiempirical methods tend to underestimate the vertical excitation energies, but the errors are much larger in the case of the standard methods (MNDO, AM1, PM3). Overall, the mean absolute deviations relative to the theoretical best estimates are lowest for OM3, and only slightly higher for OM1 and OM2 (in the range of 0.4-0.5 eV). INDO/S performs similar to OM2 for the vertical excitation energies of singlet states, but deteriorates considerably for triplet states. The INDO/S2 reparametrization for oxygen improves the results for low-lying singlet states of oxygen-containing compounds, but makes them worse for high-lying singlets as well as for triplets. The ab initio reference data for oscillator strengths and excited-state dipole moments are again best reproduced by the orthogonalization-corrected approaches (OM1, OM2, OM3), which thus emerge as the most favorable semiempirical methods overall for treating valence excited states of large organic chromophores.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 26615690     DOI: 10.1021/ct100030j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  14 in total

1.  COBRAMM 2.0 - A software interface for tailoring molecular electronic structure calculations and running nanoscale (QM/MM) simulations.

Authors:  Oliver Weingart; Artur Nenov; Piero Altoè; Ivan Rivalta; Javier Segarra-Martí; Irina Dokukina; Marco Garavelli
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Adaptive Neural Networks.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Molecular mechanism of a green-shifted, pH-dependent red fluorescent protein mKate variant.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Laura J Byrnes; Bo Shui; Ute F Röhrig; Avtar Singh; Dmitriy M Chudakov; Sergey Lukyanov; Warren R Zipfel; Michael I Kotlikoff; Holger Sondermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Benchmarking the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism on a Standard Organic Molecular Set.

Authors:  Denis Jacquemin; Ivan Duchemin; Xavier Blase
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Photoswitching of salicylidene methylamine: a theoretical photodynamics study.

Authors:  Lasse Spörkel; Joanna Jankowska; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Active site structure and absorption spectrum of channelrhodopsin-2 wild-type and C128T mutant.

Authors:  Yanan Guo; Franziska E Beyle; Beatrix M Bold; Hiroshi C Watanabe; Axel Koslowski; Walter Thiel; Peter Hegemann; Marco Marazzi; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Non-radiative relaxation of photoexcited chlorophylls: theoretical and experimental study.

Authors:  William P Bricker; Prathamesh M Shenai; Avishek Ghosh; Zhengtang Liu; Miriam Grace M Enriquez; Petar H Lambrev; Howe-Siang Tan; Cynthia S Lo; Sergei Tretiak; Sebastian Fernandez-Alberti; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Orthogonalization-Corrected Methods: Theory, Implementation, and Parameters.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Xin Wu; Lasse Spörkel; Axel Koslowski; Wolfgang Weber; Rainer Steiger; Mirjam Scholten; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Hybrid QM/MM study of FMO complex with polarized protein-specific charge.

Authors:  Xiangyu Jia; Ye Mei; John Z H Zhang; Yan Mo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Orthogonalization-Corrected Methods: Benchmarks for Ground-State Properties.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Xin Wu; Lasse Spörkel; Axel Koslowski; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.