Literature DB >> 26614687

Effects of dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on laying performance, egg quality, blood biochemistry and immune response of organic laying hens.

C Forte1, L Moscati2, G Acuti3, C Mugnai4, M P Franciosini3, S Costarelli2, G Cobellis3, M Trabalza-Marinucci3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different probiotic micro-organisms on the performance, egg quality and blood parameters of organically reared hens. A total of 900 16-week-old Hy-Line layer hybrids were randomly assigned to three groups of 300 birds each. The control (CTR) group was fed a corn-soya bean cake-based diet; the L group was fed the same diet supplemented with 0.1% Lactobacillus acidophilus, while the B group was fed the same diet supplemented with 0.05% Bacillus subtilis. Data were recorded at the beginning (weeks 5 and 6: T1) and at the end (weeks 19 and 20: T2) of the experiment, and no differences in hen performance were recorded between dietary groups or sampling times. All of the investigated clinical chemistry parameters, except GGT, were affected by diet (p < 0.05), with the best results recorded for the probiotic-treated groups. The immune-response values showed higher blood bactericidal activity in the B and L groups at T2 (p < 0.05) and a lower lysozime concentration in the B group at T1. Higher antibody production against Newcastle disease virus was observed in the L group compared to the CTR (p = 0.013). No differences in oxidative status were recorded, and no effects of diet on egg quality were observed. Among the physical egg characteristics, only the Roche scale colour was affected by diet (p < 0.05): the egg yolk was paler in the L group. The age of the hen was the most relevant factor affecting physical egg characteristics. The chemical parameters of the egg were almost unaffected by supplementation with probiotics except for the lipid content, which decreased with the L diet (p < 0.05). Both probiotic inclusions had beneficial effects on hen metabolism and welfare, and L. acidophilus induced the best immune response. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochemical indicators; immune response; laying hen; performance; probiotic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614687     DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)        ISSN: 0931-2439            Impact factor:   2.130


  14 in total

1.  Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BLCC1-0238 Can Effectively Improve Laying Performance and Egg Quality Via Enhancing Immunity and Regulating Reproductive Hormones of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Yufa Zhou; Song Li; Quanhai Pang; Zengmin Miao
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Probiotic Intake Increases the Expression of Vitellogenin Genes in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Maria S Mazanko; Maksim S Makarenko; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Alexander V Usatov; Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Anzhelika B Bren; Ivan F Gorlov; Zoya B Komarova; Richard Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Effects of the Use of a Combination of Two Bacillus Species on Performance, Egg Quality, Small Intestinal Mucosal Morphology, and Cecal Microbiota Profile in Aging Laying Hens.

Authors:  Jiajun Yang; Kai Zhan; Minhong Zhang
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Effect of fermented corn by-products on production performance, blood biochemistry, and egg quality indices of laying hens.

Authors:  Ru Yang; Anam Khalid; Fatima Khalid; Miao Ye; Yang Li; Kai Zhan; Yan Li; Wei Liu; Zaigui Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 5.  A Review of the Effects and Production of Spore-Forming Probiotics for Poultry.

Authors:  Igor V Popov; Ammar Algburi; Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir Elisashvili; Anzhelica B Bren; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Elizaveta V Tkacheva; Vladimir I Trukhachev; Irina M Donnik; Yuri A Ivanov; Dmitry Rudoy; Alexey M Ermakov; Richard M Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Immunosecurity: immunomodulants enhance immune responses in chickens.

Authors:  Keesun Yu; Inhwan Choi; Cheol-Heui Yun
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-02-13

7.  Lactobacillus acidophilus alleviates the inflammatory response to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 via inhibition of the NF-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in piglets.

Authors:  Haihua Li; Lei Zhang; Longbin Chen; Qi Zhu; Wenjie Wang; Jiayun Qiao
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus positively influences growth performance, gut morphology, and gut microbiology in rurally reared chickens.

Authors:  C Forte; E Manuali; Y Abbate; P Papa; L Vieceli; M Tentellini; M Trabalza-Marinucci; L Moscati
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effect of the combined action of Quercus cortex extract and probiotic substances on the immunity and productivity of broiler chickens.

Authors:  G K Duskaev; S G Rakhmatullin; N M Kazachkova; Y V Sheida; I N Mikolaychik; L A Morozova; B H Galiev
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-10-13

10.  Modulatory Effects of Bacillus subtilis on the Performance, Morphology, Cecal Microbiota and Gut Barrier Function of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Guangzhi Zhang; Hao Wang; Jianwei Zhang; Xinming Tang; Abdul Raheem; Mingyan Wang; Weidong Lin; Lin Liang; Yuzhuo Qi; Yali Zhu; Yaxiong Jia; Shangjin Cui; Tong Qin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.