Enu Anand1, Jayakant Singh2, Sayeed Unisa3. 1. International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai 400088, India. Electronic address: enuanand@hotmail.com. 2. School of Health Systems Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Deonar, Mumbai 400088, India. 3. International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai 400088, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore the determinants of menstrual hygienic practices and its effect on Reproductive Tract Infections (RTI) among ever married women in India. METHODS: District Level Household and Facility Survey-3 (DLHS) India data have been used in the study. The respondents constituted ever married women (N = 577,758) in the age group of 15-49. Bivariate and multivariate techniques were employed using IBM SPSS statistics 20. Individual effects of socio economic, demographic and gynecological factors on menstrual hygienic practices, RTIs and abnormal vaginal discharged respectively were calculated using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A meager 15% of women used sanitary pad/locally prepared napkins during menstruation in India. Both RTI and Vaginal discharge were positively related with non-use of hygienic methods. The women who used unhygienic method during menstruation were more likely to have any symptom of RTI (OR = 1.046, p < 0.001, CI = 1.021-1.071) and vaginal discharge (OR = 1.303, p < 0.001, CI = 1.266-1.341). CONCLUSION: The reason for the symptoms of RTI may be diverse and not only limited to the unhygienic menstrual practices although this may be one of the reasons causing reproductive morbidity. Awareness, affordability and privacy are some of the major concerns that need immediate attention to promote the use of sanitary pad during the time of menstruation. Establishing relation between menstrual practices and RTI is in its initial stage of investigation and hence needs further research.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore the determinants of menstrual hygienic practices and its effect on Reproductive Tract Infections (RTI) among ever married women in India. METHODS: District Level Household and Facility Survey-3 (DLHS) India data have been used in the study. The respondents constituted ever married women (N = 577,758) in the age group of 15-49. Bivariate and multivariate techniques were employed using IBM SPSS statistics 20. Individual effects of socio economic, demographic and gynecological factors on menstrual hygienic practices, RTIs and abnormal vaginal discharged respectively were calculated using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A meager 15% of women used sanitary pad/locally prepared napkins during menstruation in India. Both RTI and Vaginal discharge were positively related with non-use of hygienic methods. The women who used unhygienic method during menstruation were more likely to have any symptom of RTI (OR = 1.046, p < 0.001, CI = 1.021-1.071) and vaginal discharge (OR = 1.303, p < 0.001, CI = 1.266-1.341). CONCLUSION: The reason for the symptoms of RTI may be diverse and not only limited to the unhygienic menstrual practices although this may be one of the reasons causing reproductive morbidity. Awareness, affordability and privacy are some of the major concerns that need immediate attention to promote the use of sanitary pad during the time of menstruation. Establishing relation between menstrual practices and RTI is in its initial stage of investigation and hence needs further research.
Authors: Muthusamy Sivakami; Anna Maria van Eijk; Harshad Thakur; Narendra Kakade; Chetan Patil; Sharayu Shinde; Nikita Surani; Ashley Bauman; Garazi Zulaika; Yusuf Kabir; Arun Dobhal; Prathiba Singh; Bharathy Tahiliani; Linda Mason; Kelly T Alexander; Mamita Bora Thakkar; Kayla F Laserson; Penelope A Phillips-Howard Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Yasmin Mohamed; Kelly Durrant; Chelsea Huggett; Jessica Davis; Alison Macintyre; Seta Menu; Joyce Namba Wilson; Mary Ramosaea; Michael Sami; Dani J Barrington; Donna McSkimming; Lisa Natoli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Myles F Elledge; Arundati Muralidharan; Alison Parker; Kristin T Ravndal; Mariam Siddiqui; Anju P Toolaram; Katherine Pierson Woodward Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anna Maria van Eijk; M Sivakami; Mamita Bora Thakkar; Ashley Bauman; Kayla F Laserson; Susanne Coates; Penelope A Phillips-Howard Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.692