Literature DB >> 26614098

Relationship between hippocampal subfield volumes and memory deficits in patients with thalamus infarction.

Li Chen1, Tianyou Luo2, Fajin Lv1, Dandan Shi1, Jiang Qiu3, Qi Li1, Weidong Fang1, Juan Peng1, Yongmei Li1, Zhiwei Zhang1, Yang Li1.   

Abstract

Clinical studies have shown that thalamus infarction (TI) affects memory function. The thalamic nucleus is directly or indirectly connected to the hippocampal system in animal models. However, this connection has not been investigated using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in humans. From the pathological perspective, TI patients may serve as valid models for revealing the interaction between the thalamus and hippocampus in memory function. In this study, we aim to assess different hippocampal subfield volumes in TI patients and control subjects using MRI and test their associations with memory function. A total of 37 TI patients (TI group), 38 matched healthy control subjects (HC group), and 22 control patients with other stroke location (SC group) underwent 3.0-T MRI scans and clinical memory examinations. Hippocampal subfield volumes were measured and compared by using FreeSurfer software. We examined the correlation between hippocampal subfield volumes and memory scores. Smaller ipsilesional presubiculum and subiculum volumes were observed, and former was related to graphics recall in both left and right TI patients. The left subiculum volume was correlated with short-delayed recall in left TI patients. The right presubiculum volume was correlated with short- and long-delayed recall in right TI patients. TI was found to result in hippocampal abnormality and memory deficits, and its neural mechanisms might be related with and interaction between the thalamus and hippocampus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hippocampus; Memory; Presubiculum; Subiculum; Thalamus infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614098     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-015-0654-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  47 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Mild cognitive impairment: differential atrophy in the hippocampal subfields.

Authors:  B J Hanseeuw; K Van Leemput; M Kavec; C Grandin; X Seron; A Ivanoiu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A dissociation of encoding and retrieval processes in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Laura L Eldridge; Stephen A Engel; Michael M Zeineh; Susan Y Bookheimer; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Roles for the subiculum in spatial information processing, memory, motivation and the temporal control of behaviour.

Authors:  Shane M O'Mara; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Jorge R Brotons-Mas; Eugene O'Hare
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.067

5.  Verbal Working Memory Load Affects Regional Brain Activation as Measured by PET.

Authors:  J Jonides; E H Schumacher; E E Smith; E J Lauber; E Awh; S Minoshima; R A Koeppe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Projections from the nucleus reuniens thalami to the entorhinal cortex, hippocampal field CA1, and the subiculum in the rat arise from different populations of neurons.

Authors:  M J Dolleman-Van Der Weel; M P Witter
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-01-22       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M W Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Implicit and explicit memory after focal thalamic lesions.

Authors:  C Exner; G Weniger; E Irle
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields in drug-naïve patients with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  H K Lim; S C Hong; W S Jung; K J Ahn; W Y Won; C Hahn; I S Kim; C U Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of thalamic infarction on the structural and functional connectivity of the ipsilesional primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Li Chen; Tianyou Luo; Kangcheng Wang; Yong Zhang; Dandan Shi; Fajin Lv; Yang Li; Yongmei Li; Qi Li; Weidong Fang; Zhiwei Zhang; Juan Peng; Hanfeng Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Clinical Features of Thalamic Stroke.

Authors:  Xiang Yan Chen; Qiaoshu Wang; Xin Wang; Ka Sing Wong
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Relationships Between Memory Impairments and Hippocampal Structure in Patients With Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Disease.

Authors:  Miao He; Yang Li; Lijing Zhou; Yajun Li; Ting Lei; Wei Yan; Jiarui Song; Li Chen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Alterations of optic tract and retinal structure in patients after thalamic stroke.

Authors:  Chen Ye; William Robert Kwapong; Wendan Tao; Kun Lu; Ruosu Pan; Anmo Wang; Junfeng Liu; Ming Liu; Bo Wu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 5.  FreeSurfer-based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: A review of methods and applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and other collaborative efforts.

Authors:  Philipp G Sämann; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Boris Gutman; Dominik Grotegerd; Ramona Leenings; Claas Flint; Udo Dannlowski; Emily K Clarke-Rubright; Rajendra A Morey; Theo G M van Erp; Christopher D Whelan; Laura K M Han; Laura S van Velzen; Bo Cao; Jean C Augustinack; Paul M Thompson; Neda Jahanshad; Lianne Schmaal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.