Literature DB >> 26613644

Impact of oncogenic BRAF mutations and p16 expression on the growth rate of early melanomas and naevi in vivo.

P Tschandl1, A S Berghoff2,3, M Preusser2, J Pammer4, H Pehamberger1, H Kittler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important to know what drives and arrests melanocytic growth in vivo but observations linking oncogenic mutations to growth rates of melanocytic neoplasms in vivo are sparse.
OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relationship between BRAF(V) (600E) mutations and p16 expression and the growth rate of melanocytic neoplasms in vivo.
METHODS: We measured the growth rate of 54 melanocytic lesions (26 melanomas, 28 naevi) in vivo with digital dermatoscopy and correlated it with BRAF(V) (600E) and p16 expression, and with dermatoscopic and histological patterns.
RESULTS: Melanomas grew faster than naevi (mean 2·7 vs. 0·8 mm(2) /year; P < 0·001) and the growth rate was faster in lesions with more nests (> 25% nests: 2·0 mm(2) /year vs. < 25% nests: 1·0 mm(2) /year; P = 0·036). Melanomas with the BRAF(V) (600E) mutation grew significantly faster than melanomas without the mutation (mean 3·36 vs. 1·60 mm(2) /year, P = 0·018). This effect of the BRAF(V) (600E) mutation on the growth rate was not observed in melanocytic naevi (mean 1·01 vs. 0·47 mm(2) /year, P = 0·274). Histopathologically, extensive nesting, larger nests and larger cell sizes were more common in melanocytic neoplasms with the BRAF(V) (600E) mutation than in those without the mutation. Melanomas expressing p16 had a slower growth rate than melanomas without p16 expression (2·27 vs. 4·34 mm(2) /year, P = 0·047). This effect was not observed in naevi (0·81 vs. 0·68 mm(2) /year, P = 0·836).
CONCLUSIONS: The expression of BRAF(V) (600E) and the loss of p16 accelerate the growth rate of early melanomas in vivo but not in melanocytic naevi. In comparison to melanocytic proliferations that lack the mutation, the epidermal melanocytes in lesions that harbour BRAF(V) (600E) mutations are larger and more frequently arranged in large nests.
© 2015 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26613644     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  5 in total

1.  New Mechanisms of Resistance to MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma Revealed by Intravital Imaging.

Authors:  Hailey E Brighton; Steven P Angus; Tao Bo; Jose Roques; Alicia C Tagliatela; David B Darr; Kubra Karagoz; Noah Sciaky; Michael L Gatza; Norman E Sharpless; Gary L Johnson; James E Bear
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Melanocytic nevi and melanoma: unraveling a complex relationship.

Authors:  W E Damsky; M Bosenberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Oncogenic BRAF mutations and p16 expression in melanocytic nevi and melanoma in the Polish population.

Authors:  Małgorzata Mackiewicz-Wysocka; Patrycja Czerwińska; Violetta Filas; Elżbieta Bogajewska; Agata Kubicka; Anna Przybyła; Ewelina Dondajewska; Tomasz Kolenda; Andrzej Marszałek; Andrzej Mackiewicz
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Clinicopathologically problematic melanocytic tumors: a case-based review.

Authors:  Zoe Apalla; Christina Nikolaidou; Aimilios Lallas; Elena Sotiriou; Elizabeth Lazaridou; Ioannis Venizelos; Mattheos Bobos; Efstratios Vakirlis; Demetrios Ioannides; Gerardo Ferrara
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-10-31

5.  p16INK4a Expression in Porokeratosis.

Authors:  Miki Uryu; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.444

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.