Literature DB >> 26613269

Computer-mediated communication preferences predict biobehavioral measures of social-emotional functioning.

Sarah Babkirk1,2, Peter Luehring-Jones3, Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary1,2.   

Abstract

The use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) as a form of social interaction has become increasingly prevalent, yet few studies examine individual differences that may shed light on implications of CMC for adjustment. The current study examined neurocognitive individual differences associated with preferences to use technology in relation to social-emotional outcomes. In Study 1 (N = 91), a self-report measure, the Social Media Communication Questionnaire (SMCQ), was evaluated as an assessment of preferences for communicating positive and negative emotions on a scale ranging from purely via CMC to purely face-to-face. In Study 2, SMCQ preferences were examined in relation to event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with early emotional attention capture and reactivity (the frontal N1) and later sustained emotional processing and regulation (the late positive potential (LPP)). Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while 22 participants passively viewed emotional and neutral pictures and completed an emotion regulation task with instructions to increase, decrease, or maintain their emotional responses. A greater preference for CMC was associated with reduced size of and satisfaction with social support, greater early (N1) attention capture by emotional stimuli, and reduced LPP amplitudes to unpleasant stimuli in the increase emotion regulatory task. These findings are discussed in the context of possible emotion- and social-regulatory functions of CMC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-mediated communication; emotion; event-related potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26613269      PMCID: PMC5156569          DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1123181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  41 in total

1.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Jason S Moser; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-08

3.  Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Deconstructing reappraisal: descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response.

Authors:  Dan Foti; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms?

Authors:  Sally A Moore; Lori A Zoellner; Niklas Mollenholt
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-06-27

Review 6.  The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update.

Authors:  Eddie Harmon-Jones; Philip A Gable; Carly K Peterson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

8.  The late positive potential predicts emotion regulation strategy use in school-aged children concurrently and two years later.

Authors:  Sarah Babkirk; Victor Rios; Tracy A Dennis
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-11-29

9.  Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures?

Authors:  Y Groen; A A Wijers; O Tucha; M Althaus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Children's physiological indices of empathy and their socioemotional adjustment: does caregivers' expressivity matter?

Authors:  Jeffrey Liew; Nancy Eisenberg; Sandra H Losoya; Richard A Fabes; Ivanna K Guthrie; Bridget C Murphy
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2003-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.