Literature DB >> 26612880

Standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncope: 3-year insights from the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study.

Michele Brignole1, Francesco Arabia2, Fabrizio Ammirati3, Marco Tomaino4, Fabio Quartieri5, Martina Rafanelli6, Attilio Del Rosso7, Maria Rita Vecchi8, Vitantonio Russo9, Germano Gaggioli10.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects and determinants of success of cardiac pacing in patients affected by reflex syncope enrolled in the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study. Initial results have validated the effectiveness of a standardized guideline-based algorithm which can be used in clinical practice in order to select suitable candidates for cardiac pacing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this prospective, multicentre, observational study, patients aged >40 years, affected by severe unpredictable recurrent reflex syncope, underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM), followed by tilt testing (TT) if CSM was negative, followed by implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) if TT was negative. Those who had an asystolic response to one of these tests received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Of 281 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 137 (49%) received a pacemaker and were followed up for a mean of 26 ± 11 months: syncope recurred in 25 (18%) of them. At 3 years, the actuarial syncope recurrence rate was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-30] and was significantly lower than in 142 patients who did not receive a pacemaker and were observed by means of an ILR [43% (95% CI 29-57), P = 0.01]. The 3-year recurrence rate was not different among 78 CSM+, 38 TT+, and 21 ILR+ patients, whereas it was lower in 20 patients with negative TT [5% (95% CI 0-15)] than in 61 patients with positive TT [24% (95% CI 10-38)].
CONCLUSION: The benefit of cardiac pacing is maintained at 3 years, irrespective of the index diagnostic test, and is maximum in patients with negative TT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01509534. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac pacing; Carotid sinus syndrome; Implantable loop recorder; Neurally mediated syncope; Reflex syncope; Syncope; Tilt testing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26612880     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  14 in total

Review 1.  Vasovagal syncope with asystole: the role of cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Marco Tomaino; Alessio Gargaro
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 2.  Tilt table testing for syncope and collapse.

Authors:  Ritsuko Kohno; Wayne O Adkisson; David G Benditt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 3.  Pacing in neurocardiogenic/vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Richard Sutton
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-25

4.  Combined Diagnostic Yield of Tilt Table Test And Implantable Loop Recorder to Identify Patients Affected by Severe Clinical Presentation of Neurally-Mediated Reflex Syncope who Could Respond to Cardiac Pacing.

Authors:  M Tomaino; M Unterhuber; P Sgobino; F Pescoller; M Manfrin; W Rauhe
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-04-30

5.  Implantable Loop Recorder: Diagnostic Yield And Possible Therapeutic Effect In Patients With Neurally Mediated Reflex Syncope.

Authors:  M Unterhuber; W Rauhe; P Sgobino; F Pescoller; M Manfrin; M Tomaino
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 6.  [Do we need syncope units? : Experience from Bolzano, South Tyrol (Italy)].

Authors:  Matthias Unterhuber; Marco Tomaino; Michele Brignole
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 7.  Pacing for Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Rakesh Gopinathannair; Benjamin C Salgado; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Pacing in vasovagal syncope: Physiology, pacemaker sensors, and recent clinical trials-Precise patient selection and measurable benefit.

Authors:  Richard Sutton; Jelle S Y de Jong; Julian M Stewart; Artur Fedorowski; Frederik J de Lange
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 9.  Syncope and paroxysmal atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Milena Aste; Michele Brignole
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-05-08

10.  Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Marco Tomaino; Arnaud Aerts; Fabrizio Ammirati; Félix Alejandro Ayala-Paredes; Jean-Claude Deharo; Attilio Del Rosso; Mohamed H Hamdan; Maurizio Lunati; Angel Moya; Alessio Gargaro
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.