| Literature DB >> 26612688 |
Yang Zou1, Zhicai He2, Baofeng Zhao2, Yuan Liu1, Chuluo Yang1, Hongbin Wu2, Yong Cao2.
Abstract
Two star-shapedEntities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26612688 PMCID: PMC4661482 DOI: 10.1038/srep17329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Chemical structures of T0-OH, T1-OH and photoactive materials used in our study; (b) Devices configuration of conventional and inverted polymer solar cell.
Figure 2(a) J-V characteristics and (b) external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra of the PSCs based on PCDTBT:PC71BM as the active layer, with and without the interlayers.
Photovoltaic properties of the PSCs with PCDTBT as active material and various interlayers under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW cm−2), the average values were calculated from 10 individual devices fabricated under the same conditions with standard deviation for the measurements.
| Interlayer | PCEav (PCEMAX) (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | 0.753 ± 0.004 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 51.8 ± 1.8 | 4.01 ± 0.18 (4.22) |
| PFN | 0.906 ± 0.008 | 10.96 ± 0.24 | 60.5 ± 0.6 | 6.00 ± 0.16 (6.17) |
| T0-OH | 0.896 ± 0.005 | 10.98 ± 0.21 | 59.6 ± 1.4 | 5.89 ± 0.16 (6.07) |
| T1-OH | 0.902 ± 0.012 | 11.00 ± 0.27 | 61.7 ± 1.1 | 6.13 ± 0.06 (6.20) |
The device parameters of the best device are included in the parentheses for comparison.
Figure 3(a) J-V characteristics and (b) EQE spectra of the inverted PSCs with PTB7:PC71BM as the active layer and T0-OH, T1-OH or PFN as the cathode interlayer, with a device structure of ITO/interlayer/PTB7:PC71BM/MoO3/Al.
Photovoltaic properties of the inverted PSCs with PTB7 as active material and various interlayers under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW cm−2), the average values were calculated from 10 individual devices fabricated under the same conditions with standard deviation for the measurements.
| Interlayer | PCEav (PCEMAX) (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFN | 0.749 ± 0.002 | 17.08 ± 0.16 | 70.2 ± 1.2 | 8.99 ± 0.124 (9.19) |
| T0-OH | 0.748 ± 0.005 | 17.18 ± 0.08 | 70.3 ± 1.2 | 9.05 ± 0.16 (9.22) |
| T1-OH | 0.753 ± 0.005 | 17.20 ± 0.007 | 70.5 ± 1.0 | 9.14 ± 0.18 (9.30) |
The device parameters of the best device are included in the parentheses for comparison.
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6