Literature DB >> 26611642

CACNA1C risk variant affects facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals.

Vanessa Nieratschker1, Christof Brückmann1, Christian Plewnia1.   

Abstract

Recognition and correct interpretation of facial emotion is essential for social interaction and communication. Previous studies have shown that impairments in this cognitive domain are common features of several psychiatric disorders. Recent association studies identified CACNA1C as one of the most promising genetic risk factors for psychiatric disorders and previous evidence suggests that the most replicated risk variant in CACNA1C (rs1006737) is affecting emotion recognition and processing. However, studies investigating the influence of rs1006737 on this intermediate phenotype in healthy subjects at the behavioral level are largely missing to date. Here, we applied the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, a facial emotion recognition paradigm in a cohort of 92 healthy individuals to address this question. Whereas accuracy was not affected by genotype, CACNA1C rs1006737 risk-allele carries (AA/AG) showed significantly slower mean response times compared to individuals homozygous for the G-allele, indicating that healthy risk-allele carriers require more information to correctly identify a facial emotion. Our study is the first to provide evidence for an impairing behavioral effect of the CACNA1C risk variant rs1006737 on facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals and adds to the growing number of studies pointing towards CACNA1C as affecting intermediate phenotypes of psychiatric disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611642      PMCID: PMC4661469          DOI: 10.1038/srep17349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


The CACNA1C gene is one of the most promising candidate genes for psychiatric disorders. CACNA1C encodes the alpha 1C subunit of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel and is primarily expressed in the cardiovascular system but also the brain1. L-type voltage-gated calcium channels play an important role in the nervous system as they assimilate the electrical activity of neurons and muscle cells in ordered to regulate physiologically relevant processes from coupling excitation to contraction in muscle cells to modulating synaptic transmission and regulating gene expression in neurons. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CACNA1C have repeatedly been identified as risk variants for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder in genome-wide association studies234567. Furthermore, missense mutations in CACNA1C are causative for the Timothy syndrome, a multiorgan dysfunction accompanied by behavioral abnormalities including autistic traits8. Impairments in emotion recognition and processing are common features of several psychiatric disorders e.g. autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depression910111213141516. Several studies demonstrated an association between the most replicated CACNA1C risk variant rs1006737 and emotion recognition and processing, suggesting an influence of CACNA1C not only on the risk for psychiatric disorders themselves, but also on intermediate phenotypes underlying them. Previous findings include modified activation of several brain regions involved in emotion processing and memory formation (hippocampus, inferior occipital gyrus, fusiform gyrus, right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and amygdala)17181920, and decreased brain connectivity21. On a behavioral level, the results are more inconsistent. Two studies found delayed responses during facial emotion recognition and negative face matching in bipolar and schizophrenia patients compared to healthy control individuals1819 but did not discover an effect of rs1006737 genotype1819. A third study reported contradictory results. Here, an influence of CACNA1C rs1006737 genotype on facial emotion recognition was discovered in bipolar patients. In healthy individuals, no such effect was found22. Schizophrenia patients were not included in the study and the limited sample size (39 patients and 40 control individuals) might have been too small to allow the detection of effects in healthy subjects. These previous behavioral results confirm impairments in emotion recognition and processing as an intermediate phenotype of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, but given the limited number of studies conducted thus far, the contribution of CACNA1C rs1006737 to emotion recognition and processing still needs to be determined. Therefore, we designed the present study to clarify whether an effect of CACNA1C on emotion recognition can also be detected at the behavioral level in healthy individuals. We hypothesized that carrier of the CACNA1C rs1006737 risk variant will show an impaired performance in the revised version of the “reading the mind in the eyes” task (RMET)23. We have chosen the RMET as it is a sensitive test which is able to reveal subtle difficulties in emotional recognition and is therefore suitable to study healthy individuals.

Results

Genotypes

Genotype frequency was as follows: 52 individuals where risk-allele carrier (5 AA and, 47 AG) and 40 individuals were homozygous for the G allele. Both genotype groups (AA/AG vs. GG individuals) did not differ significantly with respect to age (AA/AG: 25.808 ± 7.257, GG: 26.525 ± 5.487, p = 0.604), gender ratio (AA/AG: 51.923% male, GG: 42.5% male; p = 0.375), and education (100% secondary school education).

Reading the mind in the eyes task (RMET)

CACNA1C genotype was significantly associated with performance in the RMET [F(2,89) = 4.224, p = 0.018, partial η2 = 0.087]. Subsequent pairwise comparisons revealed significant longer mean reaction times in risk-allele carriers compared to non-risk allele homozygous individuals [F(1,90) = 8.129, p = 0.005, partial η2 = 0.083] (Fig. 1). To investigate whether the reaction time depends upon the risk-allele dose, we additionally examined the three genotype groups independently. Due to the small group size for risk-allele homozygous individuals (n = 5), the data are presented descriptively. A gene dose effect could not be observed (GG homozygous individuals [n = 40]: 6263.912 ms ± 225.884; GA heterozygous individuals [n = 47]: 7457.046 ms ± 319.317; AA homozygous individuals [n = 5]: 6965.178 ms ± 1172.396), most likely due to the small number of AA-homozygote individuals. The CACNA1C genotype had no effect on the number of errors [F(1,90) = 0.023, p = 0.880] (Fig. 2).
Figure 1

Effects of CACNA1C genotype on reaction time. Mean reaction time (in ms) is shown for the two genotype groups. Risk-allele carriers (AA/AG) have significantly longer mean reaction times compared to non-risk allele homozygous individuals.

Figure 2

Effects of CACNA1C genotype on the number of errors.

The number of errors is shown for the two genotype groups. CACNA1C genotype had no effect on the number of errors. **p ≤ 0.01, error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Discussion

We investigated the influence of CACNA1C, a strong candidate gene for psychiatric disorders, on facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals to test its effect at the level of this intermediate phenotype. We found that carriers of the CACNA1C rs1006737 risk genotype (AA/AG) show a prolonged reaction time in the RMET compared to individuals homozygous for the non-risk genotype (GG), whereas the accuracy was not significantly different in both groups. Our study thus provides new evidence for an involvement of the psychiatric risk gene CACNA1C in cognitive processes underlying facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals. We have chosen a cohort of healthy individuals as the investigation of genetic effects on intermediate phenotypes in non-affected individuals is a useful approach since it is not limited by medication and other confounding factors e.g. duration and severity of the illness. Facial emotion recognition can be viewed as a valid intermediate phenotype especially for bipolar disorder as previous studies showed that deficits in facial emotion recognition are present independent from mood states and are also present in healthy first degree relatives24, suggesting that these deficits are heritable. Our data contribute to that notion, as we were able to demonstrate, that healthy carriers of a genetic variant associated with psychiatric disorders are also impaired in their facial emotion recognition abilities. The RMET was applied as a sensitive test suitable to investigate inter-individual differences of facial emotion recognition in healthy subjects. Deficits in this task have been observed in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depression, and autism23252627. Furthermore, impaired performance in the RMET predicts higher scores on measures of autistic traits in clinical samples as well as healthy control individuals2328. In this study, we only investigated the effects of the most replicated and best described variant in CACNA1C (rs1006737) without considering the contribution of other polymorphisms in CACNA1C or additional genes potentially interacting with CACNA1C. Rs1006737 is located in an intron and is therefore not causing an amino acid substitution in the encoded protein. Nevertheless, rs1006737 potentially has a functional impact, as a proxy variant for rs1006737 (rs2159100) is associated with increased gene expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex17. We cannot establish definitively whether the effect we observed in our study can be attributed to rs1006737, the proxy variant rs2159100, or any other genetic variant in linkage disequilibrium to rs1006737. A further limitation of our study is that we cannot distinguish whether the observed prolonged reaction time in the RMET is based on an impairment specific for emotional recognition or rather reflects a more general underlying deficit in complex signal detection and processing as we did not check for slower reaction times of risk-allele carriers in other neuropsychological tasks. Healthy carriers of the risk genotype were already found to be impaired in alerting and orienting29, in verbal fluency30, and in working memory31. However, other studies contradict these findings2232 or did not find impairments of healthy CACNA1C risk genotype carriers in other aspects of cognition for instance in attention32, verbal learning and memory3233343536 or logical memory37. We have decided to take the mean reaction time for all trials including errors, to give a valid estimate of the processing time a subject requires to identify and react to a facial emotion. Delays in this cognitive domain can severely impair social interactions and competence and are associated with core symptomatology especially in schizophrenia38. For instance, it has been shown that schizophrenia patients require more visual information, and therefore more time to correctly identify emotional expression in faces, compared to controls3940. Therefore, differences in emotion recognition between the risk-allele carrier and the other subjects may be more prominent in speed of performance than in accuracy of the RMET41. Since we did not detect differences in accuracy, our data most likely also reflect differences in the amount of information needed to correctly identify a facial emotion. In healthy individuals, this characteristic is not associated with obvious impairments. However, in complex and challenging situations, this subtle impairment might significantly exert negative effects on social interactions, and in psychiatric patients it might add to further deficits and contribute to psychosocial dysfunction. The effect of CANA1C on facial emotion recognition is most likely not specific, as deficits in a variety of other intermediate phenotypes have been reported in CANA1C risk-allele carriers (reviewed in4243). However, our data provide clear support that CACNA1C has a subtle but functionally relevant influence on facial emotion recognition as an intermediate phenotype involved in psychiatric disorders. In conclusion, the present study is the first to provide evidence for an impairing effect of the CACNA1C risk genotype rs1006737 AA/AG on facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals. Our finding that risk-allele carriers are subtly challenged in facial emotion recognition adds to the growing body of knowledge on the role of CACNA1C in cognitive functions affected in various psychiatric disorders. However, future studies are needed to replicate our finding in independent cohorts as well as to investigate the specificity of the effect.

Material and Methods

Subjects

Ninety-two healthy volunteers (44 males, 48 females; mean age = 26.12, SD = 6.523) participated in this study and gave written informed consent to the experimental procedure approved by the University of Tübingen local ethics committee. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. None of the subjects had a history of physical, mental, or neurological illness and none of the subjects had performed the “Reading the mind in the eyes” (REM) task before. The RMET was used to assess emotional recognition. The task was conducted as previously described23. In brief, 36 black-and-white photographs (15 cm × 6 cm) of the area of the face including and immediately surrounding the eyes were presented together with a word correctly characterizing the emotional state of the person in the photograph as well as three distracter words of the same emotional valence. Participants were asked to choose the most suitable adjective and to quickly click it on the screen. The next picture appears immediately after the response. The number of incorrect choices was measured as number of errors, the time interval between presentation of the photograph and the click on the word was recorded as reaction time.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anti-coagulated venous blood according to standard protocols. CACNA1C rs1006737 was genotyped on a StepOne system (life technologies; Darmstadt; Germany) using TaqMan®SNP Genotyping Assay C___2584015_10 (life technologies; Darmstadt; Germany) and the standard protocol for allelic discrimination. Accuracy was assessed by duplicating 15% of the original sample, and reproducibility was 100%. The genotype frequencies did not deviate from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE; p = 0.06).

Statistical analysis

Number of errors and mean reaction time were treated as outcome variables. The data were analysed with SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0; Ehningen; Germany). The effect of rs1006737 on the outcome variables was evaluated by applying a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with the between factor genotype. Results were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. For significant interaction F-values, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Nieratschker, V. et al. CACNA1C risk variant affects facial emotion recognition in healthy individuals. Sci. Rep. 5, 17349; doi: 10.1038/srep17349 (2015).
  43 in total

1.  The impact of a CACNA1C gene polymorphism on learning and hippocampal formation in healthy individuals: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Bruno Dietsche; Heidelore Backes; Davide Laneri; Thomas Weikert; Stephanie H Witt; Marcella Rietschel; Jens Sommer; Tilo Kircher; Axel Krug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  CACNA1C rs1006737 genotype and bipolar disorder: Focus on intermediate phenotypes and cardiovascular comorbidity.

Authors:  Xiao Ou; David E Crane; Bradley J MacIntosh; L Trevor Young; Paul Arnold; Stephanie Ameis; Benjamin I Goldstein
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Hippocampal and frontolimbic function as intermediate phenotype for psychosis: evidence from healthy relatives and a common risk variant in CACNA1C.

Authors:  Susanne Erk; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Phöbe Schmierer; Sebastian Mohnke; Oliver Grimm; Maria Garbusow; Leila Haddad; Lydia Poehland; Thomas W Mühleisen; Stephanie H Witt; Heike Tost; Peter Kirsch; Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth; Björn H Schott; Sven Cichon; Markus M Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel; Andreas Heinz; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Emotion recognition deficit in schizophrenia: association with symptomatology and cognition.

Authors:  C G Kohler; W Bilker; M Hagendoorn; R E Gur; R C Gur
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Mental state decoding abilities in clinical depression.

Authors:  Lisa Lee; Kate L Harkness; Mark A Sabbagh; Jill A Jacobson
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Processing of facial and nonsocial information is differentially associated with severity of symptoms in patients with multiepisode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emile Barkhof; Leo M J de Sonneville; Carin J Meijer; Lieuwe de Haan
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Independent modulation of engagement and connectivity of the facial network during affect processing by CACNA1C and ANK3 risk genes for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Danai Dima; Jigar Jogia; David Collier; Evangelos Vassos; Katherine E Burdick; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Developmental meta-analyses of the functional neural correlates of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Ezra Wegbreit; Grace K Cushman; Megan E Puzia; Alexandra B Weissman; Kerri L Kim; Angela R Laird; Daniel P Dickstein
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  The impact of CACNA1C allelic variation on effective connectivity during emotional processing in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  J Radua; S A Surguladze; N Marshall; M Walshe; E Bramon; D A Collier; D P Prata; R M Murray; C McDonald
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies 13 new risk loci for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stephan Ripke; Colm O'Dushlaine; Kimberly Chambert; Jennifer L Moran; Anna K Kähler; Susanne Akterin; Sarah E Bergen; Ann L Collins; James J Crowley; Menachem Fromer; Yunjung Kim; Sang Hong Lee; Patrik K E Magnusson; Nick Sanchez; Eli A Stahl; Stephanie Williams; Naomi R Wray; Kai Xia; Francesco Bettella; Anders D Borglum; Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Paul Cormican; Nick Craddock; Christiaan de Leeuw; Naser Durmishi; Michael Gill; Vera Golimbet; Marian L Hamshere; Peter Holmans; David M Hougaard; Kenneth S Kendler; Kuang Lin; Derek W Morris; Ole Mors; Preben B Mortensen; Benjamin M Neale; Francis A O'Neill; Michael J Owen; Milica Pejovic Milovancevic; Danielle Posthuma; John Powell; Alexander L Richards; Brien P Riley; Douglas Ruderfer; Dan Rujescu; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Teimuraz Silagadze; August B Smit; Hreinn Stefansson; Stacy Steinberg; Jaana Suvisaari; Sarah Tosato; Matthijs Verhage; James T Walters; Douglas F Levinson; Pablo V Gejman; Kenneth S Kendler; Claudine Laurent; Bryan J Mowry; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; Ann E Pulver; Brien P Riley; Sibylle G Schwab; Dieter B Wildenauer; Frank Dudbridge; Peter Holmans; Jianxin Shi; Margot Albus; Madeline Alexander; Dominique Campion; David Cohen; Dimitris Dikeos; Jubao Duan; Peter Eichhammer; Stephanie Godard; Mark Hansen; F Bernard Lerer; Kung-Yee Liang; Wolfgang Maier; Jacques Mallet; Deborah A Nertney; Gerald Nestadt; Nadine Norton; Francis A O'Neill; George N Papadimitriou; Robert Ribble; Alan R Sanders; Jeremy M Silverman; Dermot Walsh; Nigel M Williams; Brandon Wormley; Maria J Arranz; Steven Bakker; Stephan Bender; Elvira Bramon; David Collier; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Jeremy Hall; Conrad Iyegbe; Assen Jablensky; Rene S Kahn; Luba Kalaydjieva; Stephen Lawrie; Cathryn M Lewis; Kuang Lin; Don H Linszen; Ignacio Mata; Andrew McIntosh; Robin M Murray; Roel A Ophoff; John Powell; Dan Rujescu; Jim Van Os; Muriel Walshe; Matthias Weisbrod; Durk Wiersma; Peter Donnelly; Ines Barroso; Jenefer M Blackwell; Elvira Bramon; Matthew A Brown; Juan P Casas; Aiden P Corvin; Panos Deloukas; Audrey Duncanson; Janusz Jankowski; Hugh S Markus; Christopher G Mathew; Colin N A Palmer; Robert Plomin; Anna Rautanen; Stephen J Sawcer; Richard C Trembath; Ananth C Viswanathan; Nicholas W Wood; Chris C A Spencer; Gavin Band; Céline Bellenguez; Colin Freeman; Garrett Hellenthal; Eleni Giannoulatou; Matti Pirinen; Richard D Pearson; Amy Strange; Zhan Su; Damjan Vukcevic; Peter Donnelly; Cordelia Langford; Sarah E Hunt; Sarah Edkins; Rhian Gwilliam; Hannah Blackburn; Suzannah J Bumpstead; Serge Dronov; Matthew Gillman; Emma Gray; Naomi Hammond; Alagurevathi Jayakumar; Owen T McCann; Jennifer Liddle; Simon C Potter; Radhi Ravindrarajah; Michelle Ricketts; Avazeh Tashakkori-Ghanbaria; Matthew J Waller; Paul Weston; Sara Widaa; Pamela Whittaker; Ines Barroso; Panos Deloukas; Christopher G Mathew; Jenefer M Blackwell; Matthew A Brown; Aiden P Corvin; Mark I McCarthy; Chris C A Spencer; Elvira Bramon; Aiden P Corvin; Michael C O'Donovan; Kari Stefansson; Edward Scolnick; Shaun Purcell; Steven A McCarroll; Pamela Sklar; Christina M Hultman; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association of CACNA1C with bipolar disorder among the Pakistani population.

Authors:  Madiha Khalid; Terri M Driessen; Jong Seo Lee; Leon Tejwani; Asad Rasool; Muhammad Saqlain; Pakeeza Arzoo Shiaq; Muhammad Hanif; Amber Nawaz; Andrew T DeWan; Ghazala Kaukab Raja; Janghoo Lim
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  CACNA1C risk variant affects microstructural connectivity of the amygdala.

Authors:  Katharina Koch; Sophia Stegmaier; Lena Schwarz; Michael Erb; Mara Thomas; Klaus Scheffler; Dirk Wildgruber; Vanessa Nieratschker; Thomas Ethofer
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 3.  Social Behavior and Ultrasonic Vocalizations in a Genetic Rat Model Haploinsufficient for the Cross-Disorder Risk Gene Cacna1c.

Authors:  Markus Wöhr; Theresa M Kisko; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-29

4.  Deletion of the Mouse Homolog of CACNA1C Disrupts Discrete Forms of Hippocampal-Dependent Memory and Neurogenesis within the Dentate Gyrus.

Authors:  Stephanie J Temme; Ryan Z Bell; Grace L Fisher; Geoffrey G Murphy
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.