Literature DB >> 26610858

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Plus Docetaxel Versus ADT Alone in Metastatic Non castrate Prostate Cancer: Impact of Metastatic Burden and Long-term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 Trial.

Gwenaelle Gravis1, Jean-Marie Boher2, Florence Joly3, Michel Soulié4, Laurence Albiges5, Franck Priou6, Igor Latorzeff7, Remy Delva8, Ivan Krakowski9, Brigitte Laguerre10, Frédéric Rolland11, Christine Théodore12, Gael Deplanque13, Jean-Marc Ferrero14, Stéphane Culine15, Loïc Mourey16, Philippe Beuzeboc17, Muriel Habibian18, Stéphane Oudard19, Karim Fizazi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy in metastatic non castrate prostate cancer (mNCPC) is debated. Survival benefits of docetaxel (D) added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) were shown in the CHAARTED trial in patients with metastatic high-volume disease (HVD).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of metastatic burden and to update overall survival (OS) data of the GETUG-AFU15 study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized phase 3 trial of ADT plus D versus ADT alone in 385 mNCPC patients; median follow-up of 7 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Retrospective analysis was by tumor volume. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After a median follow-up of 83.9 mo, median OS in the overall population was 62.1 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.5-73.7) and 48.6 mo (95% CI, 40.9-60.6) for ADT plus D and ADT arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68-1.14]; p=0.3). Median OS in ADT plus D and ADT arms, respectively, was for HVD patients: 39.8 mo (95% CI, 28.0-53.4) versus 35.1 mo (95% CI, 29.9-43.6) (HR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.56-1.09]; p=0.14), for low-volume disease (LVD) patients; median was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 69.5-NR) and 83.4 mo (95% CI, 61.8-NR) (HR: 1.02 [95% CI, 0.67-1.55]; p=0.9). For upfront metastatic patients, OS was 52.6 mo (95% CI, 43.3-66.8) and 41.5 mo (95% CI, 36.3-54.5), respectively (HR: 0.93 [95% CI, 0.69-1.25]; p=0.6). The bPFS (HR: 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94]; p=0.014) and rPFS (HR: 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.97]; p=0.030) were significantly longer in the ADT plus D arm. Limitations included the retrospective analysis of metastatic extent and the lack of statistical power to detect a significant difference in subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: The post hoc analyses of the GETUG-AFU15 study demonstrated a nonsignificant 20% reduction in the risk of death in the HVD subgroup. Patients with LVD had no survival improvement with early D. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this study, docetaxel added to castration did not improve survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, partly due to methodological issues. However, early chemotherapy should be discussed with all patients, given the data of three randomized trials including GETUG-AFU15.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen deprivation therapy; Docetaxel; Metastatic noncastrate prostate cancer; Metastatic volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26610858     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  89 in total

1.  Time of metastatic disease presentation and volume of disease are prognostic for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

Authors:  Edoardo Francini; Kathryn P Gray; Wanling Xie; Grace K Shaw; Loana Valença; Brandon Bernard; Laurence Albiges; Lauren C Harshman; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cristopher J Sweeney
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  Therapy of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Targeting the Androgen Receptor Axis in Earlier Lines of Treatment.

Authors:  Harsh Shah; Ulka Vaishampayan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Sebastien J Hotte
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Conceptual review of key themes in treating prostate cancer in older adults.

Authors:  Ramy Sedhom; Arjun Gupta
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Timing of androgen deprivation monotherapy and combined treatments in castration-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  F Kunath; P J Goebell; B Wullich; D Sikic; A Kahlmeyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The STAMPEDE trial: paradigm-changing data through innovative trial design.

Authors:  Bradley C Carthon; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.241

7.  [Drug therapy of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer : Consensus paper of the AKO/AUO].

Authors:  C-H Ohlmann; J Gschwend; K Miller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Contemporary agents in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher Wu; Bobby Shayegan; Adrian P Rybak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Older Adults.

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Supriya G Mohile; Elizabeth Kessler; Chunkit Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  M0CRPC overview of management options.

Authors:  Y Hess-Busch; B Hadaschik; J Hess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.