| Literature DB >> 26610563 |
Nicola Lowe1, Elizabeth Westaway2, Akhtar Munir3, Saba Tahir4, Fiona Dykes5, Monique Lhussier6, Mick McKeown7, Michael Zimmerman8, Maria Andersson9, Sara Stinca10, Mukhtiar Zaman11.
Abstract
Iodine deficiency is still prevalent in parts of Pakistan, despite the introduction of a national Iodine Deficiency Disorder Control Programme in 1994. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding the use of iodised salt in a brick kiln community, and to use this information to design an intervention to increase its consumption. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess the use of iodised salt and focus group discussions explored the attitudes and barriers to its use. Thematically analysed transcripts informed the design of a 4-month intervention. Iodised salt sales and urine iodine concentration (UIC) were monitored to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. At baseline, 2.6% of households reported use of iodised salt and barriers included its higher cost and belief about a negative impact on reproduction. During the intervention, sales of salt labelled as iodised increased by 45%, however this was not reflected in an increase in UIC. This study highlighted the positive impact of education and awareness raising on iodised salt consumption in a hard to reach, marginalised community. However, issues regarding adequate iodisation by local producers and appropriate storage also need to be urgently addressed at a provincial level.Entities:
Keywords: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; Pakistan; community engagement; goitre; iodine deficiency; iodised salt; urinary iodine concentration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26610563 PMCID: PMC4663618 DOI: 10.3390/nu7115490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Overview of project timeline (FGD, Focus Group Discussion; UIC, Urine Iodine Concentration; IDD, Iodine Deficiency Disorders; KP, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; KAP, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice).
Monthly salt sales and prices reported by shopkeepers during the baseline survey.
| Type of Salt | Retail Price Range (Rp) | Number of 0.5 kg Packs Sold per Month |
|---|---|---|
| Anwar Iodised | 20–22 | 1550 |
| Shafaf | 10–12 | 2913 |
| Simple | 6–10 | 4213 |
Figure 2Salt sales during the intervention.
Age, presence of goitre and urine iodine concentration (UIC) of the study participants.
| Mean | Median | Range (min-max) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) ( | 7.6 | 7.0 | 6–12 | |
| Palpable Goitre | Number | % | ||
| Grade 0 | 219 | 87.3 | ||
| Grade 1 | 27 | 10.8 | ||
| Grade 2 | 5 | 2.0 | ||
| Visible Goitre | 5 | 2.0 | ||
| UIC (µg/L) | Mean | Median | Range (min-max) | |
| Baseline ( | 81.75 | 75.18 | 13.83–291.34 | |
| Midpoint ( | 93.39 | 77.86 | 5.86–320.33 | |
| Endpoint ( | 71.06 | 59.80* | 5.61–405.49 | |
Note baseline: 2 samples removed due to high analysis coefficient of variation; Midpoint: 11 samples removed due to high analysis coefficient of variation; End: 3 samples removed due to high analysis coefficient of variation and 1 outlier removed. * Kruskal-Wallace with Mann-Whitney post hoc test indicates a significant difference compared with baseline and midpoint, where p < 0.016.
Figure 3Sources of information regarding the health benefits of iodine.
Figure 4Which household members discussed iodized salt?