| Literature DB >> 26610560 |
Bruna L B Pereira1, Fernanda C O Arruda2, Patrícia P Reis3, Tainara F Felix4, Priscila P Santos5, Bruna P Rafacho6, Andrea F Gonçalves7, Renan T Claro8, Paula S Azevedo9, Bertha F Polegato10, Katashi Okoshi11, Ana A H Fernandes12, Sergio A R Paiva13, Leonardo A M Zornoff14, Marcos F Minicucci15.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of tomato supplementation on the normal rat heart and the role of oxidative stress in this scenario. Male Wistar rats were assigned to two groups: a control group (C; n = 16), in which animals received a control diet + 0.5 mL of corn oil/kg body weight/day, and a tomato group (T; n = 16), in which animals received a control diet supplemented with tomato +0.5 mL of corn oil/kg body weight/day. After three months, morphological, functional, and biochemical analyses were performed. Animals supplemented with tomato had a smaller left atrium diameter and myocyte cross-sectional area (CSA) compared to the control group (C group: 474 (415-539); T group: 273 (258-297) µm²; p = 0.004). Diastolic function was improved in rats supplemented with tomato. In addition, lipid hydroperoxide was lower (C group: 267 ± 46.7; T group: 219 ± 23.0 nmol/g; p = 0.039) in the myocardium of rats supplemented with tomato. Tomato intake was also associated with up-regulation of miR-107 and miR-486 and down-regulation of miR-350 and miR-872. In conclusion, tomato supplementation induces changes in miRNA expression and reduces oxidative stress. In addition, these alterations may be responsible for CSA reduction and diastolic function improvement.Entities:
Keywords: hypertrophy; microRNA; oxidative stress; tomato
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26610560 PMCID: PMC4663621 DOI: 10.3390/nu7115493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Morphological and functional data evaluated by echocardiography.
| Variable | Control Group ( | Tomato Group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 434 (419–444) | 456 (422–486) | 0.090 |
| LVDD (mm) | 7.87 ± 0.43 | 7.72 ± 0.38 | 0.305 |
| LA (mm) | 5.31 ± 0.30 | 5.05 ± 0.33 | 0.029 |
| LVDD/BW (mm/kg) | 18.2 ± 1.27 | 17.3 ± 1.9 | 0.154 |
| LA/BW (mm/kg) | 12.3 ± 0.84 | 11.3 ± 1.19 | 0.016 |
| PWT (mm) | 1.31 ± 0.07 | 1.31 ± 0.07 | 0.879 |
| RWT | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.375 |
| HR (bpm) | 259 ± 25.0 | 265 ± 26.2 | 0.454 |
| FS (%) | 50.0 ± 4.71 | 47.9 ± 3.32 | 0.148 |
| PWSV (mm/s) | 36.9 ± 4.21 | 37.5 ± 4.48 | 0.730 |
| E wave (ms) | 77.1 ± 8.60 | 73.9 ± 5.00 | 0.219 |
| A wave (ms) | 48.4 ± 4.86 | 44.3 ± 6.72 | 0.071 |
| E/A | 1.61 ± 0.19 | 1.70 ± 0.25 | 0.243 |
| EDT (ms) | 46.9 ± 8.29 | 45.7 ± 8.13 | 0.685 |
| IRT/RR0.5 (ms) | 54.2 ± 5.91 | 48.8 ± 7.52 | 0.030 |
BW: body weight; HR: heart rate; LVDD: LV end-diastolic dimension; LA: left atrium; PWT: LV posterior wall thickness; RWT: relative wall thickness; HR: heart rate; FS: endocardial fractional shortening; PWSV: posterior wall shortening velocity; E/A: peak velocity of early ventricular filling/peak velocity of transmitral flow during atrial contraction; EDT: E wave deceleration time; IRT/RR0.5: isovolumetric relaxation time adjusted by heart rate. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or as the median (lower quartile–upper quartile).
Morphometrical analysis.
| Variable | Control Group ( | Tomato Group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RV (g) | 0.25 (0.21–0.31) | 0.17 (0.14–0.18) | <0.001 |
| RV/BW | 0.06 (0.05–0.07) | 0.04 (0.03–0.04) | <0.001 |
| LV (g) | 0.96 (0.81–1.08) | 0.90 (0.84–0.96) | 0.540 |
| LV/BW | 0.22 (0.19–0.25) | 0.20 (0.18–0.20) | 0.129 |
RV: right ventricle; BW: body weight; LV: left ventricle. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or as the median (lower quartile–upper quartile).
Figure 1Left ventricle collagen type I and III expression.
Left ventricle oxidative stress.
| Variable | Control Group ( | Tomato Group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LH (nmol/g) | 267 ± 46.7 | 219 ± 23.0 | 0.039 |
| CAT (µmol/g) | 72.8 ± 7.14 | 95.3 ± 18.3 | 0.015 |
| SOD (nmol/g) | 16.2 ± 2.19 | 12.8 ± 1.10 | 0.002 |
| GSH-Px (nmol/g) | 38.5 ± 6.25 | 91.3 ± 6.36 | <0.001 |
LH: lipid hydroperoxide; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px: glutathione peroxidase. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 2Left ventricle Nrf-2 expression.
Figure 3(A) Dendogram obtained by hierarchical clustering of 11 samples, six from experimental and five from control groups. Tree view shows data visualization representing miRNAs and samples. miRNA cluster shows over-expressed (red) and under-expressed (green) miRNAs. Black color means unchanged; and (B) volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs in tomato versus control group.