| Literature DB >> 26610473 |
Huiqing Liang1,2, Limin Zhang3, Hongguo Wang4, Jinmo Tang5, Jiaen Yang6, Chuncheng Wu7, Shaodong Chen8.
Abstract
Gardenoside is one of the most important effective extractions of a herb for its hepatoprotective properties. The aim of this study was to address the mechanism of Gardenoside on HepG2 cellular steatosis induced by free fatty acids (FFAs). The model of HepG2 steatosis was duplicated by oleic and palmitic acid at the proportion of 2:1 (FFAs mixture) for 24 h, then lipid toxicity was induced. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were used to detect cell viability and Oil Red O staining method was used to judge the lipid accumulation respectively. Inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and intracellular NFκB were measured after 24 h. The steatosis was significantly decreased after Gardenoside treatment without cytotoxicity. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 were modulated to HepG2 cells by treatment of Gardenoside. In the meantime, the activation of NFκB was inhibited by Gardenoside. Gardenoside has a protective effect on FFA-induced cellular steatosis in HepG2 cells which indicates that Gardenoside might be a potential therapeutic herb against NASH by suppressed supernatant inflammatory cytokine production and intracellular NFkB activity.Entities:
Keywords: HepG2; NFκB; free fatty acid; gardenoside; inflammatory cytokines; steatosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26610473 PMCID: PMC4661916 DOI: 10.3390/ijms161126058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Cell viability assay. After treatment of Gardenoside and free fatty acids (FFAs) on the HepG2 cells, MTT assay was performed. Gardenoside was treated as 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µM for 24 h. 10 and 20 µM of Gardenoside showed no toxicity to HepG2 cells. All experiments were repeated at least three times. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared to 0 µM Gardenoside group.
Figure 2Oil Red O staining. Lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells induced by FFAs for 24 h. Lipid droplets in HepG2 cells was observed by microscope (400×): the control cells treated with only 5% BSA (A); cells treated with FFAs for 24 h (B); cells pretreated with FFAs for 24 h and cultured with Gardenoside 10 µM for 24 h (C); cells pretreated with FFAs for 24 h and cultured with Gardenoside 20 µM for 24 h (D).
Figure 3Effect of Gardenoside on triacylglycerol accumulation in FFAs induced hepatic steatosis in HepG2 cells. The Triglyceride (TG) level of the cells was measured by using TG assay kit. All experiments were repeated at least three times. ** p < 0.01, compared to control group, and ## p < 0.01, compared to FFAs group.
Effect of Gardenoside on inflammatory cytokines in HepG2.
| Groups | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | IL-1β (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 23.32 ± 1.86 | 19.16 ± 1.15 | 15.76 ± 2.04 |
| FFAs | 102.71 ± 6.89 ** | 95.52 ± 10.65 ** | 91.16 ± 6.93 ** |
| 10 µM Gardenoside | 55.62 ± 6.74 ## | 72.53 ± 7.71 # | 49.93 ± 5.32 ## |
| 20 µM Gardenoside | 50.13 ± 5.65 ## | 54.16 ± 7.84 ## | 48.82 ± 4.25 ## |
Effect of Gardenoside on inflammatory cytokines in HepG2. To determine the effect of Gardenoside on inflammatory cytokines, HepG2 cells were treated with Gardenoside in the presence of FFAs. The production and secretion of inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β were significantly increased after FFAs treatment. However, Gardenoside treatment at all 10 or 20 µM concentrations decreased the expression of these inflammatory cytokines. Three independent experiments were carried out in triplicate. ** p < 0.01, compared to control group, and # p < 0.05,## p < 0.01, compared to FFAs group.
Figure 4Changes of Phospho-NFκB p65 Protein Expression. NFκB p65 and Phospho-NFκB p65 protein expression was assessed using immunoblot analysis in HepG2 cells after incubation with or without FFAs in the presence or absence of Gardenoside 10 or 20 µM. HepG2 cells treated with DMSO were used as control (A), cells were induced by FFAs (B); cells were treated with Gardenoside 10 µM (C); 20 µM (D) for 24 h. Immunoblots are representative of three different experiments. ** p < 0.01, compared to control group, and # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared to FFAs group.