| Literature DB >> 26610250 |
Patricia Rodríguez De Gil1, Aarti P Bellara1, Rheta E Lanehart1, Reginald S Lee1, Eun Sook Kim1, Jeffrey D Kromrey1.
Abstract
Considering that the absence of measurement error in research is a rare phenomenon and its effects can be dramatic, we examine the impact of measurement error on propensity score (PS) analysis used to minimize selection bias in behavioral and social observational studies. A Monte Carlo study was conducted to explore the effects of measurement error on the treatment effect and balance estimates in PS analysis across seven different PS conditioning methods. In general, the results indicate that even low levels of measurement error in the covariates lead to substantial bias in estimates of treatment effects and concomitant reduction in confidence interval coverage across all methods of conditioning on the PS.Keywords: Monte Carlo simulation; measurement error; propensity score methods
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26610250 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1022643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multivariate Behav Res ISSN: 0027-3171 Impact factor: 5.923