Literature DB >> 26610068

Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients.

Hideaki Uchiyama1, Ken Shirabe1, Koichi Kimura1, Tomoharu Yoshizumi1, Toru Ikegami1, Norifumi Harimoto1, Yoshihiko Maehara1.   

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective investigation in order to clarify whether selecting the type of liver graft had an impact on outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT). Data from the medical records of the donors and the recipients of 321 consecutive cases of AALDLT performed between April 2004 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Our general criteria for selecting the type of liver graft was that a left graft was preferentially selected when the estimated volume of the left graft was ≥35% of the standard liver volume of the recipient, and that a right graft was selected only when the estimated remnant liver volume of the donor was ≥35% of the total liver volume. In this series, 177 left grafts, 136 right grafts, and 8 posterior grafts were used. The left grafts tended to have 2 or more arteries, whereas the right grafts tended to have 2 or more bile duct orifices. The graft survival curves and the incidences of severe complications were comparable between the AALDLT using right grafts and the AALDLT using left grafts. The preoperative estimation of graft size hardly enabled us to predict severe posttransplant complication. Moreover, small-for-size graft syndrome occurred regardless of the estimated graft volumes. Instead, donor age was a significant risk factor for small-for-size graft syndrome. In conclusion, left grafts should be more aggressively used for the sake of donors' safety. The use of hepatic grafts from older donors should be avoided if possible in order to circumvent troublesome posttransplant complications.
© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26610068     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

Review 1.  Living donor liver transplantation: eliminating the wait for death in end-stage liver disease?

Authors:  Robert A Fisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  How important is donor age in liver transplantation?

Authors:  Alberto Lué; Estela Solanas; Pedro Baptista; Sara Lorente; Juan J Araiz; Agustin Garcia-Gil; M Trinidad Serrano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Peritransplant kinetics of Mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer levels in living donor liver transplantation: its implication of posttransplant small-for-size syndrome.

Authors:  Hideaki Uchiyama; Ken Shirabe; Yuki Bekki; Takeo Toshima; Norifumi Harimoto; Toru Ikegami; Tomoharu Yoshizumi
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-05-25

4.  Prudent use of a left hepatic graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: aiming for further securing donors' safety.

Authors:  Hideaki Uchiyama
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Donor Safety in Adult-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience of 356 Cases.

Authors:  Haipeng Meng; Jiayin Yang; Lunan Yan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.