| Literature DB >> 26609806 |
Andrea Piccin1,2,3,4, Ciaran Murphy1, Elva Eakins1, Jan Kunde5, Daisy Corvetta6,7, Angela Di Pierro6, Giovanni Negri7, Mazzoleni Guido7, Laura Sainati8, Corrina Mc Mahon2, Owen Patrick Smith2,3, William Murphy1,9.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Circulating microparticles (MP) have been described in sickle cell anaemia (SCA); however, their interaction with endothelial markers remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between MP, protein C (PC), free protein S (PS), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1) and adrenomedullin (ADM) in a large cohort of paediatric patients.Entities:
Keywords: adrenomedullin; endothelin-1; microparticles; nitric oxide; protein C; protein S; sickle cell anaemia
Year: 2015 PMID: 26609806 PMCID: PMC4658688 DOI: 10.3402/jev.v4.28414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Extracell Vesicles ISSN: 2001-3078
Fig. 1Microparticles (MP) are gated on their size and ability to express phosphatidylserine when stained by Annexin V in the presence of calcium. Platelets (pink) show no expression of phosphatidylserine after staining by AV conjugated with APC, while MP (blue) show >95% positivity.
Hemoglobin levels, red cell indices, white cell count (WCC), platelet counts, bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and reticulocyte counts
| HbAA | Crisis | HbSS | HU treated | Transfusion | HbSC | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | |
| Hb (g dl−1) | 14 | 110.00 | 106–121 | 14 | 71.00 | 61–81.5 | 51 | 83.00 | 74.8–93.8 | 29 | 102.00 | 99.5–109 | 15 | 100.00 | 92.8–107.8 | 13 | 111.00 | 101.5–113.5 |
| HbF (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | 14 | 15.25 | 5.6–17.6 | 31 | 16.20 | 7.0–27.7 | 30 | 27.70 | 19.1–32.0 | 15 | 5.00 | 2.6–7.9 | 12 | 4.50 | 2.8–5.4 |
| HbS (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | 13 | 76.90 | 72.2–86.7 | 31 | 74.90 | 67.1–85.8 | 30 | 63.65 | 59.6–70.3 | 15 | 25.90 | 16.2–35.4 | 12 | 44.70 | 43.9–45.5 |
| MCV (fl) | 15 | 77 | 72.7–81.0 | 14 | 77.80 | 73.1–81.3 | 53 | 80.80 | 72.8–85.8 | 30 | 92.90 | 89.7–102.8 | 16 | 87.10 | 83.8–90.5 | 13 | 70.60 | 65.1–74.6 |
| MCH (pg/cell) | 15 | 27 | 24.6–28.1 | 14 | 25.20 | 24.3–27.9 | 53 | 27.10 | 24.9–29.6 | 29 | 34.90 | 31.1–36.8 | 16 | 30.00 | 29.3–30.98 | 13 | 24.30 | 22.9–26.6 |
| Bilirubin (µmol L−1) | 8 | 11.00 | 6.0–14.5 | 11 | 30.00 | 21.0–41.0 | 48 | 31.50 | 19.0–43.0 | 27 | 19.00 | 15.0–27.0 | 15 | 27.00 | 18.5–43.0 | 11 | 15.00 | 6.0–21.0 |
| LDH (IU L−1) | 8 | 397.50 | 384–571 | 12 | 1083.00 | 866–1,719 | 45 | 1031.00 | 783–1,388 | 26 | 731.00 | 664–894 | 15 | 780.00 | 649–1,075 | 11 | 497.00 | 420–562 |
| Neutrophil (×109 L−1) | 17 | 2.40 | 1.80–3.25 | 15 | 9.40 | 5.70–12.4 | 51 | 4.50 | 3.25–6.83 | 30 | 3.00 | 2.20–3.93 | 15 | 4.60 | 3.40–7.65 | 13 | 2.90 | 2.35–3.50 |
| Platelet (×109 L−1) | 17 | 320.00 | 290–402 | 14 | 249.50 | 148–362 | 51 | 340.00 | 282–418 | 29 | 245.00 | 177–418 | 15 | 281.00 | 177–331 | 13 | 267.00 | 230–366 |
| WCC (×109 L−1) | 17 | 7.25 | 5.40–8.98 | 15 | 16.00 | 12.9–19.3 | 51 | 13.35 | 8.67–15.7 | 30 | 7.90 | 6.15–9.63 | 15 | 11.40 | 8.1–14.3 | 13 | 8.50 | 6.20–10.7 |
| Reticulocytes (total µl−1) | 14 | 49.25 | 40.5–61.1 | 13 | 251.00 | 105–328 | 49 | 285.00 | 230–348 | 29 | 131.00 | 90.8–164 | 15 | 225.00 | 128–258 | 13 | 102.00 | 76.6–118 |
IR=interquartile range.
Adrenomedullin (ADM), endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO) levels in SCA patients and controls
| HbAA | Crisis | HbSS | HbSC | HU treated | Transfusion | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | n | Median | IR | |
| ADM (nmol L−1) | 17 | 0.28 | 0.27–0.31 | 13 | 0.19–0.42 | 0.15 | 55 | 0.27 | 0.25–0.32 | 13 | 0.26 | 0.25–0.32 | 29 | 0.30 | 0.26–0.36 | 16 | 0.30 | 0.25–0.37 |
| ET-1 (pmol L−1) | 17 | 55.1 | 45.2–63.9 | 13 | 40.5 | 9.3–46.3 | 55 | 50.1 | 28.4–57.3 | 13 | 58.8 | 28.1–76.5 | 29 | 43.6 | 12.6–49.6 | 16 | 42.6 | 21.7–48.9 |
| NO (µmol L−1) | 14 | 20.6 | 15.6–27.9 | 11 | 19.4 | 11.6–22.5 | 50 | 22.6 | 16.9–28.2 | 11 | 30.6 | 20.8–39.5 | 27 | 22.2 | 18.3–28.4 | 16 | 19.5 | 13.4–21.8 |
IR = interquartile range.
Fig. 2Blood values (total Hb, HbS percentage Hct, MCV) in the different subgroups (control with HbAA, crises, steady state, HbSC, on treatment with hydroxyurea and transfusion).
Fig. 4Values of WCC, N and PLT in the different subgroups.
Fig. 5MP numbers and percentages.
Fig. 6ADM and ET-1, NO and ADM crises by type.
Fig. 7NO, ET-1 and ADM subdivided by crises type (chest crises versus other).
Statistical analysis of indicators of efficacy
| Comparison | p | Comparison | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbS (%) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | Bilirubin (mmol L−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.01 |
| Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| Crisis vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | TXN vs. HbAA | p<0.01 | ||
| Steady state vs. HU | p<0.01 | LDH (IU L−1) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | |
| Steady state vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.05 | ||
| Steady state vs. HbSc | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbSc | p<0.001 | ||
| HU vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| HU vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | WCC (×109 L−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | |
| TXN vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
| Hb (g dl−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HU | p<0.001 | |
| Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | HbAA vs. steady state | p<0.001 | ||
| Crisis vs. steady state | p<0.01 | Neutrophil (×109 L−1) | Crisis vs. steady state | p<0.05 | |
| Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
| Crisis vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| Steady state vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Reticulocytes (ml−1) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.05 | |
| Steady state vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
| HU vs. steady state | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| TXN vs. normal | p<0.05 | TXN vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
| HbF (%) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.01 | |||
| HU vs. steady state | p<0.05 | ||||
| HU vs. TXN | p<0.001 |