Literature DB >> 26609729

Can the Formation of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals Be Computationally Predicted? 2. Crystal Structure Prediction.

Panagiotis G Karamertzanis1, Andrei V Kazantsev1, Nizar Issa1, Gareth W A Welch1, Claire S Adjiman1, Constantinos C Pantelides1, Sarah L Price1.   

Abstract

We report a multistage lattice energy minimization methodology for generating stable packing arrangements of cocrystals containing flexible molecules. In the first approximation, the intermolecular electrostatic interactions are modeled with atomic charges and the molecular deformation energy is interpolated over a set of precomputed quantum mechanical values. At subsequent stages, the accuracy is improved by first using analytically rotated and then conformation-dependent multipole moments, computed from the isolated-molecule charge density, and "on-the-fly" quantum mechanical calculations to compute the intramolecular deformation energy. This multistage approach increases the efficiency of the search and establishes the molecule-dependent error due to the atomic charge representation of the charge density and the neglect of the conformational dependence of atomic multipole moments. The methodology is used to study the lattice energy landscapes of the cocrystals of 4-aminobenzoic acid with 2,2'-bipyridine and 4-nitrophenylacetic acid, as well as the single-component crystals. All single-component, experimentally determined crystal structures within the scope of the search were found at, or very close to, the global minimum. The experimental cocrystal with 2,2'-bipyridine is also predicted to be among the most stable packing arrangements. On the contrary, the lattice energy landscape of the cocrystal with 4-nitrophenylacetic acid contains several low energy structures that are more stable than the experimentally observed form and have different hydrogen bonding motifs. Overall, the methodology can provide worthwhile crystal energy landscapes for multicomponent organic solids and thereby contribute to understanding cocrystal formation.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 26609729     DOI: 10.1021/ct8004326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  8 in total

1.  Aggregation of Kanamycin A: dimer formation with physiological cations.

Authors:  Johannes M Dieterich; Ulrich Gerstel; Jens-Michael Schröder; Bernd Hartke
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  Engineering Cocrystals of PoorlyWater-Soluble Drugs to Enhance Dissolution in Aqueous Medium.

Authors:  Indumathi Sathisaran; Sameer Vishvanath Dalvi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  The Structure, Thermodynamics and Solubility of Organic Crystals from Simulation with a Polarizable Force Field.

Authors:  Michael J Schnieders; Jonas Baltrusaitis; Yue Shi; Gaurav Chattree; Lianqing Zheng; Wei Yang; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Which, if any, hydrates will crystallise? Predicting hydrate formation of two dihydroxybenzoic acids.

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Panagiotis G Karamertzanis; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Solid-State Forms of β-Resorcylic Acid: How Exhaustive Should a Polymorph Screen Be?

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Panagiotis G Karamertzanis; Jean-Baptiste Arlin; Alastair J Florence; Volker Kahlenberg; Derek A Tocher; Ulrich J Griesser; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Efficient Screening of Coformers for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Cocrystallization.

Authors:  Isaac J Sugden; Doris E Braun; David H Bowskill; Claire S Adjiman; Constantinos C Pantelides
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.010

7.  Unraveling Complexity in the Solid Form Screening of a Pharmaceutical Salt: Why so Many Forms? Why so Few?

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Sreenivas R Lingireddy; Mark D Beidelschies; Rui Guo; Peter Müller; Sarah L Price; Susan M Reutzel-Edens
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation.

Authors:  Christopher R Taylor; Graeme M Day
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.076

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.