Literature DB >> 26609716

Energies, Geometries, and Charge Distributions of Zn Molecules, Clusters, and Biocenters from Coupled Cluster, Density Functional, and Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap Models.

Anastassia Sorkin1, Donald G Truhlar1, Elizabeth A Amin1.   

Abstract

We present benchmark databases of Zn-ligand bond distances, bond angles, dipole moments, and bond dissociation energies for Zn-containing small molecules and Zn coordination compounds with H, CH3, C2H5, NH3, O, OH, H2O, F, Cl, S, and SCH3 ligands. The test set also includes clusters with Zn-Zn bonds. In addition, we calculated dipole moments and binding energies for Zn centers in coordination environments taken from zinc metalloenzyme X-ray structures, representing both structural and catalytic zinc centers. The benchmark values are based on relativistic-core coupled cluster calculations. These benchmark calculations are used to test the predictions of four density functionals, namely B3LYP and the more recently developed M05-2X, M06, and M06-2X levels of theory, and six semiempirical methods, including neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) calculations incorporating the new PM3 parameter set for Zn called ZnB, developed by Brothers and co-workers, and the recent PM6 parametrization of Stewart. We found that the best DFT method to reproduce dipole moments and dissociation energies of our Zn compound database is M05-2X, which is consistent with a previous study employing a much smaller and less diverse database and a much larger set of density functionals. Here we show that M05-2X geometries and single-point coupled cluster calculations with M05-2X geometries can also be used as benchmarks for larger compounds, where coupled cluster optimization is impractical, and in particular we use this strategy to extend the geometry, binding energy, and dipole moment databases to additional molecules, and we extend the tests involving crystal-site coordination compounds to two additional proteins. We find that the most predictive NDDO methods for our training set are PM3 and MNDO/d. Notably, we also find large errors in B3LYP for the coordination compounds based on experimental X-ray geometries.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 26609716     DOI: 10.1021/ct900038m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  18 in total

1.  Density-functional expansion methods: evaluation of LDA, GGA, and meta-GGA functionals and different integral approximations.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Methanethiol Binding Strengths and Deprotonation Energies in Zn(II)-Imidazole Complexes from M05-2X and MP2 Theories: Coordination Number and Geometry Influences Relevant to Zinc Enzymes.

Authors:  Douglas P Linder; Kenton R Rodgers
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Simulations of allosteric motions in the zinc sensor CzrA.

Authors:  Dhruva K Chakravorty; Bing Wang; Chul Won Lee; David P Giedroc; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A mechanistic investigation into the zinc carbenoid-mediated homologation reaction by DFT methods: is a classical donor-acceptor cyclopropane intermediate involved?

Authors:  Wilhelm A Eger; Charles K Zercher; Craig M Williams
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Calculation of Heats of Formation for Zn Complexes: Comparison of Density Functional Theory, Second Order Perturbation Theory, Coupled-Cluster and Complete Active Space Methods.

Authors:  Michael N Weaver; Kenneth M Merz; Dongxia Ma; Hyun Jung Kim; Laura Gagliardi
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Tomáš Kubař; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Computational exploration of zinc binding groups for HDAC inhibition.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Liping Xu; Olaf Wiest
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 8.  Axial preferences in allylation reactions via the Zimmerman-Traxler transition state.

Authors:  Tom Mejuch; Noga Gilboa; Eric Gayon; Hao Wang; K N Houk; Ilan Marek
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.384

9.  Polarized Molecular Orbital Model Chemistry. II. The PMO Method.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Luke Fiedler; Hannah R Leverentz; Donald G Truhlar; Jiali Gao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Theoretical study on the chemical mechanism of enoyl-CoA hydratase and the form of inhibitor binding.

Authors:  Xiaobin Cui; Rongxing He; Qinlei Yang; Wei Shen; Ming Li
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.