Literature DB >> 26608253

Radiation Dose Survey for Common Computed Tomography Exams: 2013 British Columbia Results.

Yogesh Thakur1, Thorarin A Bjarnason2, Patricia Baxter3, Mitch Griffith4, Kirk Eaton5.   

Abstract

In 2013 Health Canada conducted a national survey of computed tomography (CT) radiation usage. We analysed contributions from all 7 public health authorities in the province of British Columbia, which covered scanner age, number of slices, and common adult protocols (≥ 19 years: 70 ± 20 kg, head, chest, abdomen/pelvis, and trunk). Patient doses were recorded for common protocols. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) was calculated using scanner data with >10 patient doses recorded for each protocol. Data was analysed based on image reconstruction (filtered backprojection vs iterative reconstruction [IR] vs IR available but not in use). Provincial response was 92%, with 59 of 64 CT data used for analysis. The average scanner age was 5.5 years old, with 39% of scanners installed between 2008-2013; 78.5% of scanners were multislice (>64 slices), and 44% of scanners had IR available. Overall British Columbia DRLs were: head = 1305, chest = 529, abdomen/pelvis = 819, and trunk = 1225. DRLs were consistent with Health Canada recommendations and other Canadian published values, but above international standards. For sites with IR available, less than 50% used this technology routinely for head, chest and trunk exams. Overall, use of IR reduced radiation usage between 11%-32% compared to filtered backprojection, while sites using IR vs IR available used 30%/43% less radiation for head/chest exams (P < .05). No significant difference was observed for abdomen/pelvis exams (P = .385). With the fast pace of CT technical advancement, DRLs should reflect the technology used, instead of just globally applied to anatomical regions. Federal guidelines should be updated at a higher frequency to reflect new technology. In addition, new technologies must be utilised to optimize image quality vs radiation usage. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Computed tomography dose; Diagnostic reference levels; Medical imaging; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26608253     DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  1 in total

1.  Periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: is iterative reconstruction software necessary to establish ultra-low-dose protocols? A quantitative and qualitative approach.

Authors:  Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Christoph Erxleben; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.