Literature DB >> 26608099

Can prehospital Modified Early Warning Score identify non-trauma patients requiring life-saving intervention in the emergency department?

Siu Chung Leung1, Ling Pong Leung2, Kit Ling Fan2, Wai Lam Yip1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aim to investigate whether prehospital Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) can identify non-trauma patients requiring life-saving intervention (LSI) within 4 h of presentation to the ED.
METHODS: It was a prospective study of non-trauma ED patients by ambulance who were 16 years or older from 1 to 27 November 2013. Prehospital MEWS was calculated according to vital signs measured by the ambulance crew. Data on patients' demographics, triage category, LSI within 4 h of ED presentation and 24 h mortality were retrieved. LSI was defined as emergency interventions to airway, breathing and circulation, emergency procedures and medications administered. The performance of prehospital MEWS was analysed with sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), likelihood ratios (LR) and the receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: Recruited during the study period were 1493 patients. The median age was 78 years. Of the patients, 49.9% belonged to critical, emergent or urgent triage categories. LSI was required in 321 patients (21.5%). Thirteen died within 24 h of ED presentation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of prehospital MEWS relating to LSI was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.75). The sensitivity, specificity, positive PV, negative PV, positive LR and negative LR were 0.57, 0.76, 0.40, 0.87, 2.43 and 0.56, respectively, when prehospital MEWS  ≥3 was chosen as the cut-off value.
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital MEWS is useful in identifying non-trauma patients requiring LSI within 4 h of ED presentation. This may in turn enhance the triage accuracy in the ED in addition to clinical assessment.
© 2015 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulance; critical illness; emergency medical service; prognosis; sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26608099     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  6 in total

1.  A retrospective cohort study of the utility of the modified early warning score for interfacility transfer of patients with traumatic injury.

Authors:  Kristin Salottolo; Matthew Carrick; Jacob Johnson; Mark Gamber; David Bar-Or
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Prognostic value of Modified Early Warning Score generated in a Chinese emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaohua Xie; Wenlong Huang; Qiongling Liu; Wei Tan; Lu Pan; Lei Wang; Jian Zhang; Yunyun Wang; Yingchun Zeng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Predictive value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term prognosis of emergency trauma patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhejun Yu; Feng Xu; Du Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature.

Authors:  Smitha Bhaumik; Merhej Hannun; Chelsea Dymond; Kristen DeSanto; Whitney Barrett; Lee A Wallis; Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.803

5.  A customized early warning score enhanced emergency department patient flow process and clinical outcomes in a COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ali Yazdanyar; Megan R Greenberg; Zhe Chen; Shuisen Li; Marna Rayl Greenberg; Anthony P Buonanno; David B Burmeister; Shadi Jarjous
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-30

6.  Efficacy of prehospital National Early Warning Score to predict outpatient disposition at an emergency department of a Japanese tertiary hospital: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takuro Endo; Toru Yoshida; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Takako Motohashi; Hsiang-Chin Hsu; Shunsuke Fukuda; Jumpei Tsukuda; Takaki Naito; Kenichiro Morisawa; Nobuhiko Shimozawa; Yasuhiko Taira; Shigeki Fujitani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.