Literature DB >> 26607989

Giant barocaloric effects at low pressure in ferrielectric ammonium sulphate.

P Lloveras1, E Stern-Taulats2, M Barrio1, J-Ll Tamarit1, S Crossley3, W Li3,4, V Pomjakushin5, A Planes2, Ll Mañosa2, N D Mathur3, X Moya2,3.   

Abstract

Caloric effects are currently under intense study due to the prospect of environment-friendly cooling applications. Most of the research is centred on large magnetocaloric effects and large electrocaloric effects, but the former require large magnetic fields that are challenging to generate economically and the latter require large electric fields that can only be applied without breakdown in thin samples. Here we use small changes in hydrostatic pressure to drive giant inverse barocaloric effects near the ferrielectric phase transition in ammonium sulphate. We find barocaloric effects and strengths that exceed those previously observed near magnetostructural phase transitions in magnetic materials. Our findings should therefore inspire the discovery of giant barocaloric effects in a wide range of unexplored ferroelectric materials, ultimately leading to barocaloric cooling devices.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26607989      PMCID: PMC4674762          DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Foodstuffs, beverages, medicine, electronics and populated spaces all require cooling, but existing refrigeration and air-conditioning units rely primarily on the compression and expansion of environmentally harmful fluids. Resurgent interest in solid materials that display magnetically, electrically and mechanically driven phase transitions near room temperature123 has provoked interest in the possibility of environment-friendly cooling applications, but these will only come to fruition if it is possible to develop or discover inexpensive materials that show large reversible thermal changes in response to fields that are small and easy to generate. Mechanical stress is easy to generate, but large barocaloric (BC) effects driven by hydrostatic pressure near phase transitions have only been observed in a small number of relatively expensive magnetic materials, where changes of magnetization are accompanied by changes in crystal symmetry45 or volume alone678 (Table 1). (Large BC effects have also been observed in poly(methyl methacrylate) away from any transition9.) Here we demonstrate giant BC effects near the ferrielectric phase transition10111213 in a powder of ammonium sulphate (AS) [(NH4)2SO4], which is made from cheap abundant elements and enjoys widespread agricultural use as a fertilizer. We use calorimetry to identify pressure-driven isothermal entropy changes of |ΔS|∼60 J K−1 kg−1, which exceed the corresponding values that have been found for metallic alloys near first-order magnetic phase transitions (∼10–25 J K−1 kg−1; Table 1), and predicted for PbTiO3 and BaTiO3 near first-order ferroelectric phase transitions1415 (∼3–4 J K−1 kg−1). These giant entropy changes are driven using small changes of hydrostatic pressure |Δp|=|p−patm|∼|p|∼0.1 GPa, yielding giant BC strengths1 |ΔS|/|Δp|, |Q|/|Δp| and |ΔT|/|Δp| (Table 1) (where Q is the heat, T is the temperature and atmospheric pressure patm∼0 GPa). Our giant BC effects may be understood via pressure-driven changes in ionic ordering, whereas the smaller BC effects in magnetic materials45678 arise due to pressure-driven changes in the density of electronic states near the Fermi level.
Table 1

Giant BC effects at first-order phase transitions.

Giant BC materialTS|T||Q|p|Sp|Tp||Qp|RCRef.
 KJK−1kg−1KkJkg−1GPaJK−1kg−1GPa−1KGPa−1kJkg−1GPa−1Jkg−1 
Ni49.26Mn36.08In14.6629324[4.5]7.10.2692.317.327.31204
Gd5Si2Ge2270111.12.90.20555.514.5815
LaFe11.33Co0.47Si1.22378.72.22.00.2043.511101806
Fe49Rh5130812.5[8.1]3.80.111147434.51057
Mn3GaN28521.6[4.8]6.20.0923251.466.21258
AS21960[8]13.20.1060080132276This work

BC, barocaloric; |Δp|, hydrostatic pressure change; |Q|, isothermal heat; RC, refrigerant capacity; |ΔS|, isothermal entropy change; T, starting temperature; |ΔT|, adiabatic temperature change.

|ΔS|, |ΔT| and |Q| arise at T, due to changes of |Δp|. The corresponding strengths |ΔS|/|Δp|, |ΔT|/|Δp| and |Q|/|Δp| were maximized by choosing the smallest values of |Δp| compatible with maximizing |ΔS|. Bold entries denote data derived from direct measurements. Italicised entries denote data derived from quasi-direct1 measurements. Bracketed entries denote data derived via -cΔT≃TΔS=Q using zero-pressure specific heat capacity c. For all entries, Q=TΔS.

Results

Ferrielectric phase transition in AS at atmospheric pressure

At room temperature, AS adopts a centrosymmetric orthorhombic structure (Pnam) with four formula units per unit cell comprising three ionic groups (Fig. 1a) that are understood to adopt a disordered configuration at any given instant1617. On cooling, the material is generally considered to undergo a reversible order–disorder phase transition to an orthorhombic polar structure (Pna21) that is ferrielectric1011. Our heat flow dQ/dT measurements confirm that this transition occurs in two steps10111213. First, the symmetry change arises from a non-isochoric first-order transition at T1∼221 K associated with partial ionic ordering (Fig. 1b). Second, further ordering yields additional changes of volume in a continuous manner down to ∼160 K (Fig. 1b-d). (Figure 1d was obtained using temperature-dependent lattice parameters (Supplementary Fig. 1) calculated from X-ray diffraction patterns (Supplementary Fig. 2).) The first-order transition is weakly hysteretic and occurs at T1∼224 K on heating. Its start and finish temperatures on cooling are Tc1∼223 K and Tc2∼216 K, respectively, and its start and finish temperatures on heating are Th1∼222 K and Th2∼229 K, respectively.
Figure 1

Ferrielectric phase transition in AS at atmospheric pressure.

(a) Unit cell of the high-temperature orthorhombic phase (Pnam). (b) Heat flow dQ/dT on cooling (blue) and heating (red) across the full transition. Baselines are black and dQ/dT>0 denotes endothermic processes. (c) Resulting entropy change ΔS(T) with respect to the low-temperature phase, revealing entropy changes for the first-order transition (|ΔS1|) and the entire transition (|ΔSf|). (d) Unit-cell volume V(T) on heating, revealing volume changes for the first-order transition (|ΔV1|) and the entire transition (|ΔVf|).

Integration of (dQ/dT)/T yields the corresponding entropy change ΔS(T) (Fig. 1c), with |ΔSf|=130±6 J K−1 kg−1 for the full transition. Integration of dQ/dT across the full transition yields a corresponding heat of |Qf|=29±2 kJ kg−1. These values are in good agreement with previous experimental values1213 of |ΔSf|∼126–133 J K−1 kg−1 and |Qf|∼28–30 kJ kg−1, and are consistent with the change of entropy |ΔSf|=3Rln2=130 J K−1 kg−1 expected16 for an order-disorder transition involving three ionic groups per formula unit (R=8.314 J K−1 mol−1). For the first-order transition alone, integration yields |ΔS1|=65±4 J K−1 kg−1 and latent heat |Q1|=14.5±1.0 kJ kg−1. These values correspond to ∼50% of the aforementioned values for the full transition and closely match literature values13 of |ΔS1|=61 J K−1 kg−1 and |Q1|=13.6 kJ kg−1 for deuterated AS [(ND4)2SO4], where no aspect of the transition is modified by the deuteration. On heating through the ferrielectric transition, X-ray diffraction data confirm the expected changes in crystal structure101113. The unit-cell volume V decreases by ∼0.9% across the full transition (ΔVf=−4.4±0.2 Å3) and by ∼0.5% across the first-order transition alone (ΔV1=−2.5±0.2 Å3) (Fig. 1d). Given that BC effects per unit mass m due to pressure change Δp=p2−p1 may be expressed using the Maxwell relation m−1(∂V/∂T)=−(∂S/∂p) as1 ΔS(p1→p2)=−m−1(∂V/∂T)dp′, we anticipate inverse BC effects in the transition regime where (∂V/∂T)<0 and we anticipate conventional BC effects away from the transition regime where (∂V/∂T)>0.

Ferrielectric phase transition in AS under applied pressure

For the first-order transition, heat flow measurements dQ/dT reveal a strong pressure-induced shift in T1 (Fig. 2a,b), with dT1/dp=−57±4 K GPa−1 on heating and dT1/dp=−45±4 K GPa−1 on cooling. A similar shift of −45±6 K GPa−1 on heating is obtained via the Clausius-Clapeyron equation dT1/dp=Δv1/ΔS1, using ΔS1=65±4 J K−1 kg−1 (Fig. 1c) and specific volume change Δv1=−(2.9±0.2) × 10−6 m3 kg−1 (from Fig. 1d). These large values of dT1/dp are similar to those reported for single-crystal AS1819 and magnetic alloys (Table 2), and indicate that the narrow first-order transition of width Tc1Tc2∼Th2−Th1∼7 K may be fully driven in either direction using moderate values of |Δp|∼0.15 GPa.
Figure 2

Ferrielectric phase transition in AS under applied pressure.

(a) Heat flow dQ/dT on cooling and heating across the transition for different values of increasing pressure p, after baseline subtraction. (b) Transition temperature T1(p) for the first-order transition, obtained below 0.3 GPa from the calorimetric data of a (closed symbols) and below ∼1.0 GPa from neutron diffraction of deuterated AS (open symbols). (c) Unit-cell volume V(T) obtained on cooling at selected pressures from neutron diffraction of deuterated AS (closed symbols), with inset showing |ΔV1(p)|. The X-ray diffraction data of Fig. 1d are included to demonstrate consistency (open symbols). (d) Entropy change |ΔS1(p)| for the first-order transition, obtained from the calorimetric data of a. Lines in b and d represent linear fits.

Table 2

Properties of first-order phase transitions in giant BC materials.

Giant BC materialV1|V1|/V1|dT1/dp|Ref.
 Å3%KGPa−1 
Ni49.26Mn36.08In14.660.20.4184
Gd5Si2Ge23.40.5325
LaFe11.33Co0.47Si1.2181.2736
Fe49Rh510.31.2 (ref. 24)547
Mn3GaN0.61.2 (ref. 34)658
AS2.5±0.20.545±2This work

AS, ammonium sulphate; BC, barocaloric; |dT1/dp|, pressure-driven shift in transition temperature; |ΔV1|, unit-cell volume change; |ΔV1|/V1, relative unit-cell volume change.

For AS, we give the shift obtained over a wide pressure range on cooling.

The discrepancy in values of T1(p) measured on heating and cooling (Fig. 2b) evidences a thermal hysteresis that is suppressed below the maximum value of p∼0.3 GPa for our calorimeter. At even higher pressures, neutron diffraction data for deuterated AS reveal that dT1/dp remains constant (open symbols, Fig. 2b), while |ΔV1| falls (Fig. 2c), implying via the Clausius–Clapeyron equation a pressure-induced suppression of |ΔS1|. (Figure 2c was obtained using temperature-dependent lattice parameters (Supplementary Fig. 1) calculated from neutron diffraction patterns (Supplementary Fig. 3).) This suppression was confirmed (Fig. 2d) from finite-pressure plots of |ΔS1(T)| (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b) obtained from the calorimetric data of Fig. 2a, as described in Methods.

BC effects in AS

The fall in |ΔS1(p)| arises because of additional changes in isothermal entropy ΔS+(p) that are reversible, large and change sign across the first-order transition. Above T1(p), these additional entropy changes correspond to conventional BC effects associated with elastic heat, which arises at all temperatures, except while driving transitions. Near and below T1(p), these additional entropy changes correspond to inverse BC effects, because the continuous part of the full transition precludes elastic heat. The additional entropy changes would be challenging to detect via the calorimetry of Fig. 2, but they may be expressed1 away from the first-order transition as ΔS(p1→p2)=−m−1(∂V/∂T)dp′, using the aforementioned Maxwell relation with S+ replacing S. From this formulation, we anticipate large values of ΔS+ given an AS volumetric thermal expansion coefficient V−1(∂V/∂T) whose magnitude ∼10−4 K−1 (Supplementary Fig. 5a) exceeds the corresponding values62021222324 of ∼10−7–10−5 K−1 for the magnetic BC materials of Table 1. To confirm that the fall in |ΔS1(p)| arises due to additional changes of entropy ΔS+ away from T1(p), we evaluated ΔS+(p) on applying pressure above T1(p) at T+=236 K by assuming (∂V/∂T) to be independent of pressure such that ΔS+(p)=−[m−1(∂V/∂T)]p (pressure-dependent data are unavailable due to inaccurate low-pressure control coupled with excessive neutron acquisition times). Choosing T+>T1(p) is convenient, because it avoids the forbidden possibility of T1(p) falling to T+ at high pressure. Using the resulting values of ΔS+(p) at T+=236 K (Supplementary Fig. 5b) to displace at this temperature the finite-pressure plots of ΔS1(T) (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b for heating and cooling, respectively), we have constructed finite-pressure plots of total entropy change ΔS(T,p) (Fig. 3a,b) specified with respect to the zero-pressure total entropy below the first-order transition at 208 K. Whether the calorimetrically accessible value of ΔS1(T) was measured on heating (for Fig. 3a) or cooling (for Fig. 3b), the resulting values of ΔS(208 K, p) match well with predictions of ΔS+(p) that were obtained by setting T+ to 208 K (Supplementary Fig. 5b), thus providing quantitative confirmation that the fall in |ΔS1(p)| arises due to the sign change in BC effects across the first-order transition.
Figure 3

Giant inverse BC effects in AS.

(a,b) Entropy change ΔS(T,p) with respect to S(T=208 K, p=0) (black dot), deduced using additional entropy change ΔS+(p) at T+=236 K, to offset the pressure-dependent entropy change ΔS1(T) that arises on (a) heating and (b) cooling through the first-order transition. (c) Isothermal entropy change ΔS for increasing pressure (0→p) as deduced from a and for decreasing pressure (p→0) as deduced from b. Reversibility is apparent up to a few degrees below Tc1(p=0)∼223.5 K.

Our plot of ΔS(T,p) for data obtained on heating (Fig. 3a) permits us to establish isothermal BC effects on applying pressure (Fig. 3c), as heating and high pressure both tend to favour the high-temperature, high-pressure centrosymmetric phase. Similarly, our plot of ΔS(T,p) for data obtained on cooling (Fig. 3b) permits us to establish isothermal BC effects on decreasing pressure (Fig. 3c), as cooling and low pressure both tend to favour the low-temperature ferrielectric phase. Near and above the value of Tc1(p=0) indicated, discrepancies in isothermal entropy change on applying and removing pressure evidence irreversibility. By contrast, reversible BC effects are apparent a few degrees below Tc1(p=0) and at all lower temperatures studied, consistent with no significant thermal hysteresis in the first-order transition (Fig. 2b). The largest reversible isothermal entropy change |ΔS|∼60±5 J K−1 kg−1 arises at ∼219 K and exceeds the giant BC effects reported for magnetic alloys (Table 1). The sharpness of the transition in ΔS(T) (Fig. 3a,b) permits this large entropy change to be achieved with a low value of |Δp|=0.1 GPa (Fig. 3c), yielding giant BC strengths1 |ΔS|/|Δp| and |Q|/|Δp| (Table 1). Larger pressures extend reversible BC effects to lower temperatures, causing the large refrigerant capacity25 RC=|ΔS| × (FWHM of ΔS(T)) (Table 1) to increase (Fig. 4) despite the small reduction in |ΔS1(p)| (Fig. 2d) and therefore |ΔS(p)|. For any given value of applied pressure, AS outperforms all of the magnetic alloys so well that comparable RC values would require much larger changes of pressure (Fig. 4).
Figure 4

Refrigerant capacity RC for giant BC materials.

For the materials in Table 1, we compare values of RC=|ΔS| × (FWHM of ΔS(T)) for selected pressure changes of magnitude |Δp|=|p−patm|∼|p|, using ΔS(T) for BC cooling, and constraining T to ensure reversibility (except for LaFe11.33Co0.47Si1.2, where only BC cooling data are available, and Ni49.26Mn36.08In14.66, where only BC heating data are available). Solid lines represent linear fits.

Our largest value of |ΔS|∼60±5 J K−1 kg−1, arising due to |Δp|=0.1 GPa at ∼219 K, corresponds to an adiabatic temperature change |ΔT|=(T/c)|ΔS|∼8±1 K, using a specific heat capacity c=1,700±80 J K−1 kg−1 (Supplementary Fig. 6) that is assumed to be independent of pressure as usual45678. The resulting value of |ΔT|/|Δp| is seen to be the largest observed for giant BC materials (Table 1).

Discussion

Our observation of giant reversible BC effects in ferrielectric salts made from inexpensive abundant elements should inspire the study of BC effects in similar materials, most immediately bulk ferroelectrics that display large thermally driven entropy changes associated with displacive and order-disorder phase transitions. In future, it would be attractive to increase transition temperatures by chemical substitution2627 or using an electric field28. It would also be attractive to perform direct thermal measurements in the vicinity of room temperature, to confirm the large BC effects predicted using the Maxwell relation (Supplementary Fig. 5b), which are reversible over a wide range of temperatures. Our findings should stimulate the development of cooling devices based on BC materials, whose energy efficiency2930 is good with respect to magnetocaloric, electrocaloric and elastocaloric materials3. Unlike elastocaloric materials driven by uniaxial stress, there are no losses or mechanical breakdown associated with plastic deformation. Unlike magnetocaloric materials, there is no need to generate large magnetic fields at great expense. Unlike electrocaloric materials, there is no need to fabricate multilayer devices to exploit giant effects in films31. Moreover, the phase transitions giving rise to large BC effects can be driven over a wide range of operating temperatures, unlike both magnetocaloric and electrocaloric materials.

Methods

Samples

Powders of AS (≥99.0%) and deuterated AS (≥99.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The typical grain size was <100 μm. AS was used for calorimetry and X-ray diffraction. Deuterated AS was used for neutron diffraction to reduce incoherent scattering.

Calorimetry at atmospheric pressure

Measurements of heat flow dQ/dT were performed at atmospheric pressure using a commercial TA Q2000 differential scanning calorimeter at 10 K min−1. Heat |Qf|=|(dQ/dT′)dT′| and entropy change |ΔSf|=|(dQ/dT′)/T′dT′| across the full transition were obtained after subtracting baseline backgrounds32, with Ta chosen above (below) the transition on cooling (heating) and Tb chosen below (above) the transition on cooling (heating). The entropy change on partially driving the transition by heating to temperature T is ΔS(T)=(dQ/dT′)/T′dT′. The entropy change on partially driving the transition by cooling to temperature T is ΔS(T)=|ΔSf|−(dQ/dT′)/T′dT′. Zero-field heat capacity data were obtained using the TA Q2000 on cooling in the modulated differential scanning calorimetry mode, with the constant temperature method33. The temperature step was 1 K, the temperature modulation was 0.5 K and the period was 60 s.

Calorimetry under applied pressure

Measurements of heat flow dQ/dT at constant hydrostatic pressure were performed at ±1–2 K min−1, using a differential thermal analyser constructed in-house, with chromel-alumel thermocouples, a Cu–Be Bridgman pressure cell operating up to 0.3 GPa and a circulating thermal bath (Lauda Proline RP 1290, 183–473 K). AS was mixed with an inert perfluorinated liquid and hermetically encapsulated by Sn. DW-Therm (Huber Kältemaschinenbau GmbH) was used as pressure-transmitting medium. For more details, see refs 4, 5, 6, 7. Absolute measurements of temperature in the differential thermal analyser and differential scanning calorimeter differ by ∼1 K.

X-ray diffraction

High-resolution X-ray diffraction was performed in transmission using Cu Kα1=1.5406 Å radiation in an INEL diffractometer, with a curved position-sensitive detector (CPS120), a 0.5-mm diameter Lindemann capillary and a 700 series Oxford Cryostream Cooler.

Neutron diffraction

High-resolution neutron diffraction was performed at the Paul Scherrer Institute, using the high-resolution powder diffractometer for thermal neutrons. Deuterated AS was mixed with NaCl powder to determine the applied pressure, and the mixture was encapsulated in a Pb clamp cell operating up to ∼1 GPa. Temperature was varied using a cryostat operating in 1.4–320 K. The neutron wavelength was set to 1.88570 Å. Lattice parameters were determined by pattern matching using FullProf software.

Data availability

All relevant data are presented via this publication and Supplementary Information.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Lloveras, P. et al. Giant barocaloric effects at low pressure in ferrielectric ammonium sulphate. Nat. Commun. 6:8801 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9801 (2015).
  5 in total

1.  Inverse barocaloric effect in the giant magnetocaloric La-Fe-Si-Co compound.

Authors:  Lluís Mañosa; David González-Alonso; Antoni Planes; Maria Barrio; Josep-Lluís Tamarit; Ivan S Titov; Mehmet Acet; Amitava Bhattacharyya; Subham Majumdar
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Giant solid-state barocaloric effect in the Ni-Mn-In magnetic shape-memory alloy.

Authors:  Lluís Mañosa; David González-Alonso; Antoni Planes; Erell Bonnot; Maria Barrio; Josep-Lluís Tamarit; Seda Aksoy; Mehmet Acet
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Giant barocaloric effect enhanced by the frustration of the antiferromagnetic phase in Mn3GaN.

Authors:  Daichi Matsunami; Asaya Fujita; Koshi Takenaka; Mika Kano
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  The electrocaloric efficiency of ceramic and polymer films.

Authors:  Emmanuel Defay; Sam Crossley; Sohini Kar-Narayan; Xavier Moya; Neil D Mathur
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Caloric materials near ferroic phase transitions.

Authors:  X Moya; S Kar-Narayan; N D Mathur
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 43.841

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Large electrocaloric effects in single-crystal ammonium sulfate.

Authors:  S Crossley; W Li; X Moya; N D Mathur
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Mechanocaloric effects in shape memory alloys.

Authors:  Lluís Mañosa; Antoni Planes
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Thermodynamics of multicaloric effects in multiferroic materials: application to metamagnetic shape-memory alloys and ferrotoroidics.

Authors:  Antoni Planes; Teresa Castán; Avadh Saxena
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Giant barocaloric effects over a wide temperature range in superionic conductor AgI.

Authors:  Araceli Aznar; Pol Lloveras; Michela Romanini; María Barrio; Josep-Lluís Tamarit; Claudio Cazorla; Daniel Errandonea; Neil D Mathur; Antoni Planes; Xavier Moya; Lluís Mañosa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Elastic properties of superconductors and materials with weakly correlated spins.

Authors:  Christian Binek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mechanocaloric effects in superionic thin films from atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Arun K Sagotra; Daniel Errandonea; Claudio Cazorla
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Room-temperature mechanocaloric effects in lithium-based superionic materials.

Authors:  Arun K Sagotra; Dewei Chu; Claudio Cazorla
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Colossal barocaloric effects near room temperature in plastic crystals of neopentylglycol.

Authors:  P Lloveras; A Aznar; M Barrio; Ph Negrier; C Popescu; A Planes; L Mañosa; E Stern-Taulats; A Avramenko; N D Mathur; X Moya; J-Ll Tamarit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Colossal barocaloric effects in the complex hydride Li[Formula: see text]B[Formula: see text]H[Formula: see text].

Authors:  Kartik Sau; Tamio Ikeshoji; Shigeyuki Takagi; Shin-Ichi Orimo; Daniel Errandonea; Dewei Chu; Claudio Cazorla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Giant barocaloric effect in the ferroic organic-inorganic hybrid [TPrA][Mn(dca)3] perovskite under easily accessible pressures.

Authors:  Juan M Bermúdez-García; Manuel Sánchez-Andújar; Socorro Castro-García; Jorge López-Beceiro; Ramón Artiaga; María A Señarís-Rodríguez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.