Gihan M Bareh1, Ethan Jacoby2, Peter Binkley2, Tien-Cheng Arthur Chang2, Robert S Schenken2, Randal D Robinson2. 1. Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Loma Linda University Health Care, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Electronic address: gbareh@llu.edu. 2. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sperm DNA integrity in normozoospermic male partners plays a role in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): Group I: 26 male partners of women with unexplained RPL. Group II: 31 normozoospermic males with proven fertility. INTERVENTION(S): Semen samples were collected by masturbation after 48-72 hours of abstinence. After liquefaction at room temperature, semen analysis was performed according to World Health Organization standards. Only samples with >20 × 10(6) spermatozoa/mL with at least 50% progressive sperm motility and 30 % normal morphology were selected for the study. DNA fragmentation of the sperm was assessed with TUNEL assay followed by flow cytometric analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm DNA fragmentation in both groups. RESULT(S): Mean DNA fragmentation (mean ± SD) was significantly more in men with RPL (36.8 ± 5) compared with controls (9.4 ± 2.7). CONCLUSION(S): Sperm DNA fragmentation may play a role in unexplained RPL despite normal semen analysis parameters.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sperm DNA integrity in normozoospermic male partners plays a role in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): Group I: 26 male partners of women with unexplained RPL. Group II: 31 normozoospermic males with proven fertility. INTERVENTION(S): Semen samples were collected by masturbation after 48-72 hours of abstinence. After liquefaction at room temperature, semen analysis was performed according to World Health Organization standards. Only samples with >20 × 10(6) spermatozoa/mL with at least 50% progressive sperm motility and 30 % normal morphology were selected for the study. DNA fragmentation of the sperm was assessed with TUNEL assay followed by flow cytometric analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm DNA fragmentation in both groups. RESULT(S): Mean DNA fragmentation (mean ± SD) was significantly more in men with RPL (36.8 ± 5) compared with controls (9.4 ± 2.7). CONCLUSION(S): Sperm DNA fragmentation may play a role in unexplained RPL despite normal semen analysis parameters.