Literature DB >> 26606987

Operative treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: Anatomical and functional outcome of three different operative techniques.

N Gusic1, I Fedel2, N Darabos3, Z Lovric4, N Bukvic5, B Bakota6, D Lemac7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of the intraarticular calcaneal fracture is a challenge. The optimal method of treatment remains controversial. This study evaluates the anatomical and functional postoperative outcomes of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures that have been treated using three different techniques of ORIF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2011 we treated 143 patients with calcaneal fractures, 40 of these patients (28%) were treated conservatively. This is a retrospective study of the remaining 103 patients (72%) who were operated on consecutively, mainly by one surgeon (NG). Calcaneal fractures were classified according to the Sanders classification. Three types of osteosynthesis were used: standard anatomical plate (SP), locking anatomical plate (LCP) and standard anatomical plate with autologous bone graft (SP+ABG). Clinical outcome was assessed one year after the operation: anatomical reduction was evaluated according to the analysis of Bohler's angle at final follow-up, and functional assessment was conducted using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS).
RESULTS: The fractures were classified as follows: 35 (34%) Sanders type II, 47 (45.6%) Sanders type III and 21 (20.4%) Sanders type IV. The SP was used in 67 (65%) fractures, LCP in 16 (15.5%) and SP+ABH in 20 (19.4%). The correlation test showed a weak association between the Sanders fracture type and the operation technique (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.26). The non-parametric tests showed that the fracture type did not significantly influence the postoperative Bohler's angle outcome (p=0.132), or the type of operation (p=0.664). Excellent or good reduction of the posterior calcaneal facet was achieved in all operated fractures. One year after the operation, the distribution of Bohler's angle was normal with a mean 31.9° (SD 4.84) in all three groups. There was no significant difference in the functional postoperative outcome in terms of MFS in the three groups (p=0.601), but the Sanders fracture type had significant influence on the functional postoperative outcome in terms of MFS (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: In the representative sample of 103 operatively treated intraarticular calcaneal fractures, anatomical and functional postoperative efficacy outcomes appeared to be similar in all three treatment groups. High-grade displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (Sanders IV) had worse functional results irrespective of the type of operation. The optimal method for management of intraarticular calcaneal fracture is operative, using the standard anatomic calcaneal plate. Autologous bone grafting is not required. Large sample comparative studies are still needed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone graft; Calcaneal fracture; Functional outcome; Operative treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26606987     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Plating technique outcome evaluation in calcaneal fracture based on American orthopaedics foot and ankle score and Böhler-Gissane angle: A case series.

Authors:  Ananto Satya Pradana; Edi Mustamsir; Sulung Breilyan; Domy Pradana Putra; Krisna Yuarno Phatama; Mohamad Hidayat
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  A minimally invasive (sinus tarsi) approach with percutaneous K-wires fixation for intra-articular calcaneal fractures in children.

Authors:  Lei Tong; Mingjing Li; Fan Li; Jian Xu; Tao Hu
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Inner Retinal Layer and Outer Retinal Layer Findings after Macular Hole Surgery Assessed by means of Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Alessandro Marchese; Francesco Bandello; Michele Coppola
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  Bone graft versus non-bone graft for treatment of calcaneal fractures: A protocol for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Heng Tian; Wenlai Guo; Jinlan Zhou; Xiaoyue Wang; Zhe Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis for complex displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures: An expected value decision analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel David Eisenstein; Nicholas A Kusnezov; Brian R Waterman; Justin D Orr; James A Blair
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-09-13

6.  An evaluation of the efficacy of the locked plate with bone grafting in Sanders type III and IV intra-articular calcaneus fractures.

Authors:  Ali Varol; Yunus Oc; Bekir Eray Kilinc
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-08-21

Review 7.  3D printing-assisted extended lateral approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guang Shi; Wei Liu; Ying Shen; Xiyu Cai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Sanders type 3-4 calcaneal fractures fixed with locking plate: does tri-cortical iliac bone autograft provide extra benefit for stabilization?

Authors:  Tugrul Bulut; Merve Gursoy; Tahir Ozturk; Cem Ozcan; Muhittin Sener
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Comparison and predictive factors analysis for efficacy and safety of Kirschner wire, anatomical plate fixation and cannulated screw in treating patients with open calcaneal fractures.

Authors:  Weiguang Zhao; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  The role of bone grafts in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A prospective study protocol.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang He; Zheng-Hao Lu; Jun Ou; Zhi-Liang Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.