Literature DB >> 26606683

Can slight glucose intolerance during pregnancy predict future maternal atherosclerotic morbidity?

R Charach1, T Wolak2, I Shoham-Vardi3, R Sergienko3, E Sheiner1.   

Abstract

AIM: o examine the association between glucose level during pregnancy and the subsequent development of long-term maternal atherosclerotic morbidity.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The study included all women who had at least one glucose measurement during their pregnancies. Cases were all women who delivered between the years 2000-2012 and subsequently developed atherosclerotic morbidity (n = 815). Controls were randomly matched by age and year of delivery (n = 6065). The atherosclerotic morbidity group was further divided by severity: major events (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure), minor events (hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidaemia without target organ damage or complications) and cardiac evaluation tests (such as coronary angiography without records of atherosclerosis, cardiac scan and stress test). The mean follow-up duration for the study group was 74 months. Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for confounders.
RESULTS: A significant linear association was found between glucose levels during pregnancy and long-term maternal atherosclerotic morbidity. Among the cases with severe atherosclerotic morbidity, the proportion of women with a high glucose level (> 5.5 mmol/l) was the highest, whereas in controls it was the lowest (P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazard model, adjusted for atherosclerotic confounders such as gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and obesity, a glucose level of > 5.5 mmol/l was noted as an independent risk factor for hospitalizations later in non-pregnant life (hazard ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.5, P < 0.003).
CONCLUSION: A high glucose level during pregnancy, even if within the range of slight glucose intolerance, may serve as a marker for future maternal atherosclerotic morbidity. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm our findings.
© 2015 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26606683     DOI: 10.1111/dme.13036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  6 in total

1.  How we deliver obstetric care.

Authors:  Laura A Magee; Sandra Lowe; Catherine Nelson-Piercy
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2016-06-01

2.  Ages at menarche and menopause and reproductive lifespan as predictors of exceptional longevity in women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Aladdin H Shadyab; Caroline A Macera; Richard A Shaffer; Sonia Jain; Linda C Gallo; Margery L S Gass; Molly E Waring; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Fasting glucose concentrations and associations with reproductive history over 40 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Maeve E Wallace; Lydia Bazzano; Cuilin Zhang; Emily Harville
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Associations between noncommunicable disease risk factors, race, education, and health insurance status among women of reproductive age in Brazil - 2011.

Authors:  Jonetta Johnson Mpofu; Lenildo de Moura; Sherry L Farr; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Betine Moehlecke Iser; Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal; Cheryl L Robbins; Felipe Lobelo
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 5.  Long-Term Effects of Pregnancy Complications on Maternal Health: A Review.

Authors:  Ran Neiger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Gestational diabetes and long-term risk for dyslipidemia: a population-based historical cohort study.

Authors:  Gabriel Chodick; Yaara Tenne; Yael Barer; Varda Shalev; Uriel Elchalal
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.