Christian Iorio-Morin1, Fahd AlSubaie, David Mathieu. 1. *Neurosurgery Division, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; ‡Saudi National Neuroscience Institute, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is commonly used in treating small vestibular schwannomas; however, its use for larger vestibular schwannomas is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of treating eligible Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas with GKRS. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective evaluation of patient undergoing GKRS for Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas. We evaluated clinical, imaging, and treatment characteristics and assessed treatment outcome. Inclusion criteria were tumor size of ≥4 cm and follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded. Primary outcomes measured were tumor control rate, hearing and facial function preservation rate, and complications. All possible factors were analyzed to assess clinical significance. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 6-125 months). Baseline hearing was serviceable in 60%. Median tumor volume at radiosurgery was 7.4 cm (range, 4-19 cm). The median marginal dose used was 12 Gy at the 50% isodose line. Actuarial tumor control rates were 95% and 92% at 2 and 10 years, respectively. Actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rates were 89% and 49% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Facial nerve preservation was 100%. Clinical complications included balance disturbance (11%), facial pain (10%), facial numbness (5%), and tinnitus (10%). Most complications were mild and transient. Hydrocephalus occurred in 3 patients, requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Larger tumor size was significantly associated with persisting symptoms post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas and minimal symptoms can be treated safely and effectively with GKRS.
BACKGROUND: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is commonly used in treating small vestibular schwannomas; however, its use for larger vestibular schwannomas is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of treating eligible Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas with GKRS. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective evaluation of patient undergoing GKRS for Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas. We evaluated clinical, imaging, and treatment characteristics and assessed treatment outcome. Inclusion criteria were tumor size of ≥4 cm and follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded. Primary outcomes measured were tumor control rate, hearing and facial function preservation rate, and complications. All possible factors were analyzed to assess clinical significance. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 6-125 months). Baseline hearing was serviceable in 60%. Median tumor volume at radiosurgery was 7.4 cm (range, 4-19 cm). The median marginal dose used was 12 Gy at the 50% isodose line. Actuarial tumor control rates were 95% and 92% at 2 and 10 years, respectively. Actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rates were 89% and 49% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Facial nerve preservation was 100%. Clinical complications included balance disturbance (11%), facial pain (10%), facial numbness (5%), and tinnitus (10%). Most complications were mild and transient. Hydrocephalus occurred in 3 patients, requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Larger tumor size was significantly associated with persisting symptoms post-treatment. CONCLUSION:Patients with Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas and minimal symptoms can be treated safely and effectively with GKRS.
Authors: Ujwal Yeole; A R Prabhuraj; Arimappamagan Arivazhagan; K V L Narasingarao; Vikas Vazhayil; Dhananjaya Bhat; Dwarakanath Srinivas; Bhanumathi Govindswamy; Somanna Sampath Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-05-23
Authors: Chloe Dumot; Stylianos Pikis; Georgios Mantziaris; Zhiyuan Xu; Rithika Kormath Anand; Ahmed M Nabeel; Darrah Sheehan; Kimball Sheehan; Wael A Reda; Sameh R Tawadros; Khaled Abdel Karim; Amr M N El-Shehaby; Reem M Emad Eldin; Selcuk Peker; Yavuz Samanci; Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz; Herwin Speckter; Wenceslao Hernández; Julio Isidor; Manjul Tripathi; Renu Madan; Brad E Zacharia; Lekhaj C Daggubati; Nuria Martínez Moreno; Roberto Martínez Álvarez; Anne-Marie Langlois; David Mathieu; Christopher P Deibert; Vivek R Sudhakar; Christopher P Cifarelli; Denisse Arteaga Icaza; Daniel T Cifarelli; Zhishuo Wei; Ajay Niranjan; Gene H Barnett; L Dade Lunsford; Greg N Bowden; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Giulia Cossu; Michael J Link; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Ari G Chacko; Kenji Ohata; Majid Samii; Ashish Suri; Michael Bruneau; Jan F Cornelius; Luigi Cavallo; Torstein R Meling; Sebastien Froelich; Marcos Tatagiba; Albert Sufianov; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Jeroen B Verheul; Constantin Tuleasca; Mercy George; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy Thomas Daniel Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Daniel Rueß; Lea Pöhlmann; Stefan Grau; Christina Hamisch; Mauritius Hoevels; Harald Treuer; Christian Baues; Martin Kocher; Maximillian Ruge Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Patrick P J H Langenhuizen; Sander H P Sebregts; Svetlana Zinger; Sieger Leenstra; Jeroen B Verheul; Peter H N de With Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Umberto Tosi; Miguel E Tusa Lavieri; Anjile An; Omri Maayan; Sergio W Guadix; Antonio P DeRosa; Paul J Christos; Susan Pannullo; Philip E Stieg; Andrew Brandmaier; Jonathan P S Knisely; Rohan Ramakrishna Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-02-18