Literature DB >> 2660647

Recognizing and adjusting to barriers in doctor-patient communication.

T E Quill1.   

Abstract

Barriers frequently develop in physician-patient encounters. If they go unrecognized, they can severely limit the therapeutic potential of the doctor-patient relationship. Because barriers are not always explicit, a strategy is presented for recognizing implicit signs such as verbal-nonverbal mismatch, cognitive dissonance, unexpected resistance, and physician discomfort. Once a potential barrier is identified, its source can be defined and explored using standard clinical reasoning techniques such as hypothesis generation and testing. Patients can often share in the process of generating hypotheses about the nature and sources of barriers. Once defined and understood, most barriers can be lessened and sometimes resolved using the basic communication skills of acknowledgment, exploration, empathy, and legitimation. When conflict exists, common interests and differences must be clarified. Conflict might involve disagreement about the presence of a barrier, its nature or source, its relevance to the physician-patient relationship, or about strategies for approaching it. Negotiation need not be limited to the initial positions, but can include creative solutions whereby both parties gain. The decision to confront a barrier depends on both doctor and patient readiness, as well as how critical the barrier is to the therapeutic process, and how amenable it is to change. By effectively uncovering and addressing barriers, the physician can often turn roadblocks to effective communication into means for enhancing the therapeutic relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2660647     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-1-51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  24 in total

Review 1.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.

Authors:  A Towle; W Godolphin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Fighting the good fight: responsibility and rationale in the confrontation of patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Kontos; John Querques; Oliver Freudenreich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  The physician as patient.

Authors:  S G Mendel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Birth defects, causal attributions, and ethnicity in the national birth defects prevention study.

Authors:  Amy P Case; Marjorie Royle; Angela E Scheuerle; Suzan L Carmichael; Karen Moffitt; Tunu Ramadhani
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  The influence of information technology on patient-physician relationships.

Authors:  Michael Weiner; Paul Biondich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The concept of negotiation in shared decision making.

Authors:  Lars Sandman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-01-07

8.  The influence of Hispanic ethnicity on parent-provider communication about asthma.

Authors:  Courtney Carlin; Alison B Yee; Maria Fagnano; Jill S Halterman
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.168

9.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Cancer and patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Michael Diefenbach; Gina Turner; Kristen M Carpenter; Lisa Kennedy Sheldon; Karen M Mustian; Mary A Gerend; Christine Rini; Christian von Wagner; Ellen R Gritz; Amy McQueen; Heather M Prayor-Patterson; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.