Literature DB >> 26605518

Evolution of motion uncertainty in rectal cancer: implications for adaptive radiotherapy.

Jean-Paul J E Kleijnen1, Bram van Asselen, Johannes P M Burbach, Martijn Intven, Marielle E P Philippens, Onne Reerink, Jan J W Lagendijk, Bas W Raaymakers.   

Abstract

Reduction of motion uncertainty by applying adaptive radiotherapy strategies depends largely on the temporal behavior of this motion. To fully optimize adaptive strategies, insight into target motion is needed. The purpose of this study was to analyze stability and evolution in time of motion uncertainty of both the gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) for patients with rectal cancer. We scanned 16 patients daily during one week, on a 1.5 T MRI scanner in treatment position, prior to each radiotherapy fraction. Single slice sagittal cine MRIs were made at the beginning, middle, and end of each scan session, for one minute at 2 Hz temporal resolution. GTV and CTV motion were determined by registering a delineated reference frame to time-points later in time. The 95th percentile of observed motion (dist95%) was taken as a measure of motion. The stability of motion in time was evaluated within each cine-MRI separately. The evolution of motion was investigated between the reference frame and the cine-MRIs of a single scan session and between the reference frame and the cine-MRIs of several days later in the course of treatment. This observed motion was then converted into a PTV-margin estimate. Within a one minute cine-MRI scan, motion was found to be stable and small. Independent of the time-point within the scan session, the average dist95% remains below 3.6 mm and 2.3 mm for CTV and GTV, respectively 90% of the time. We found similar motion over time intervals from 18 min to 4 days. When reducing the time interval from 18 min to 1 min, a large reduction in motion uncertainty is observed. A reduction in motion uncertainty, and thus the PTV-margin estimate, of 71% and 75% for CTV and tumor was observed, respectively. Time intervals of 15 and 30 s yield no further reduction in motion uncertainty compared to a 1 min time interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26605518     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Motion management strategies and technical issues associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of thoracic and upper abdominal tumors: A review from NRG oncology.

Authors:  Edward D Brandner; Indrin J Chetty; Tawfik G Giaddui; Ying Xiao; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Consuelo Rosa; Luciana Caravatta; Monica Di Tommaso; David Fasciolo; Lucrezia Gasparini; Fiorella Cristina Di Guglielmo; Antonietta Augurio; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Claudio Vecchi; Domenico Genovesi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Effect of intrafraction adaptation on PTV margins for MRI guided online adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chavelli M Kensen; Tomas M Janssen; Anja Betgen; Lisa Wiersema; Femke P Peters; Peter Remeijer; Corrie A M Marijnen; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.309

4.  Online adaptive radiotherapy compared to plan selection for rectal cancer: quantifying the benefit.

Authors:  R de Jong; K F Crama; J Visser; N van Wieringen; J Wiersma; E D Geijsen; A Bel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept.

Authors:  Dennis Winkel; Gijsbert H Bol; Petra S Kroon; Bram van Asselen; Sara S Hackett; Anita M Werensteijn-Honingh; Martijn P W Intven; Wietse S C Eppinga; Rob H N Tijssen; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Hans C J de Boer; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Jochem Hes; Mirjam Willemsen-Bosman; Eline N de Groot-van Breugel; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Bas W Raaymakers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-02

6.  Improving the clinical workflow of a MR-Linac by dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT.

Authors:  Bin Tang; Min Liu; Bingjie Wang; Peng Diao; Jie Li; Xi Feng; Fan Wu; Xinghong Yao; Xiongfei Liao; Qing Hou; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: Initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac.

Authors:  Alex Dunlop; Adam Mitchell; Alison Tree; Helen Barnes; Lorna Bower; Joan Chick; Edmund Goodwin; Trina Herbert; Rebekah Lawes; Helen McNair; Dualta McQuaid; Jonathan Mohajer; Rahul Nilawar; Angela Pathmanathan; Gillian Smith; Ian Hanson; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.