| Literature DB >> 26605343 |
Tobias Weber1, Athanasios Mavratzas1, Stefan Kiesgen1, Stephanie Haase1, Benedikt Bötticher1, Evelyn Exner1, Walter Mier2, Ludger Grosse-Hovest3, Dirk Jäger1, Michaela A E Arndt4, Jürgen Krauss1.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have evolved as a new class of potent cancer therapeutics. We here report on the development of ADCs with specificity for the B-cell lineage specific (surface) antigen CD22 being expressed in the majority of hematological malignancies. As targeting moiety a previously generated humanized anti-CD22 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derivative from the monoclonal antibody RFB4 was reengineered into a humanized IgG1 antibody format (huRFB4). Onconase (ranpirnase), a clinically active pancreatic-type ribonuclease, was employed as cytotoxic payload moiety. Chemical conjugation via thiol-cleavable disulfide linkage retained full enzymatic activity and full binding affinity of the ADC. Development of sophisticated purification procedures using size exclusion and ion exchange chromatography allowed the separation of immunoconjugate species with stoichiometrically defined number of Onconase cargos. A minimum of two Onconase molecules per IgG was required for achieving significant in vitro cytotoxicity towards lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. Antibody-drug conjugates with an Onconase to antibody ratio of 3 : 1 exhibited an IC50 of 0.08 nM, corresponding to more than 18,400-fold increased cytotoxicity of the ADC when compared with unconjugated Onconase. These results justify further development of this ADC as a promising first-in-class compound for the treatment of CD22-positive malignancies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26605343 PMCID: PMC4641194 DOI: 10.1155/2015/561814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Figure 1Equilibrium-binding curves of murine RFB4 and huRFB4 IgG. Binding activity to CD22-positive Raji cells at indicated concentrations was determined by flow cytometry performing triplicate measurements. Bars represent standard errors (SEs) of mean values. MFImax: maximum median fluorescence intensity.
Figure 2In vitro characterization of SMCC-based immuno-RNase ADCs. (a) In situ RNase activity of the immuno-RNase ADC (1.2 μg) and ONC alone (2.0 μg) was analyzed by zymogram gel electrophoresis on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels containing poly-rU (0.3 mg/mL) as RNase substrate. Migration distances of molecular weight markers are indicated (kDa). (b) Binding activity of huRFB4 IgG (5 nM) and the immuno-RNase ADC (5 nM) to CD22-positive Daudi cells and CD22-negative Jurkat cells is shown as median fluorescence intensity (MFI). (c) Cytotoxicity of the immuno-RNase ADC and ONC alone towards CD22-positive Daudi cells in vitro was determined by cell viability assay. Results are expressed relative to buffer-treated control cells. Data depict the mean value ± SE from one representative experiment performed in triplicate.
Figure 3Purification of monomeric SPDP-based ADCs. (a) Size exclusion chromatography of the SPDP-based immunoconjugate preparation on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pg column. Eluted column fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing (b) and reducing (c) conditions. Lane 1: molecular weight marker; lanes 2–4: column fractions eluting at 58.6 mL, 67.9 mL, and 106.4 mL, respectively; lane 5: huRFB4 IgG (1 μg); and lane 6: ONC (1 μg).
Figure 4Purification of SPDP-based ADCs with distinct molar DAR. Ion exchange chromatography yielded immuno-RNases with distinct OARs as confirmed by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing (a) and reducing (c) conditions. Lane 1: molecular weight marker; lanes 2–4: ADCs with OARs of 1 : 1, 2 : 1, and 3 : 1 (1 μg each); lane 5: huRFB4 IgG (1 μg); lane 6: ONC (1 μg). (b) Size exclusion chromatography of IEX-purified immuno-RNases was performed on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column.
Binding affinity and ribonucleolytic activity of SPDP-based ADCs.
| OAR | Binding affinitya | Ribonucleolytic activityb | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| ONC | — | NA | 14.1 ± 0.8 |
| huRFB4 IgG | — | 0.27 ± 0.02 | NA |
| SPDP-based 162 kDa ADC | 1 : 1 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 14.1 ± 0.8 |
| SPDP-based 174 kDa ADC | 2 : 1 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 26.5 ± 2.4 |
| SPDP-based 186 kDa ADC | 3 : 1 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 40.2 ± 3.3 |
aRelative binding affinity (K ) to CD22-positive Raji cells was calculated from equilibrium-binding curves as determined by flow cytometry performed in triplicate. bRibonucleolytic activity (k cat/K ) was determined from at least three independent assays. Values are expressed as mean ± SE.
NA: not applicable.
Figure 5Dose- and DAR-dependent in vitro cytotoxicity of SPDP-based ADCs. CD22-positive Daudi (a), Nalm6 (b), and CD22-negative Jurkat (c) cells were incubated with varying concentrations of SPDP-based ADCs with distinct OARs. ONC and huRFB4 IgG were used as positive and negative control, respectively. Cell viability was determined after 72 h and is expressed relative to buffer-treated control cells. (d) Cytotoxic activities towards Daudi cells of immunoconjugates with low OAR were compared to antibody-ONC populations with higher ONC loading (OARs 8–12) at equal molar doses of 10 nM each. As immunoconjugate species with eight to twelve ONC payloads could not be further separated, molar calculations for the 250–290 kDa ADC were averaged for a payload of 10 RNases. Data depict the mean value ± SE from one representative experiment performed in triplicate.
Dose- and DAR-dependent in vitro cytotoxicity of SPDP-based ADCs.
| OAR | Daudi | Nalm6 | Jurkat | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 ± SE (nM) | IC50 ± SE (nM) | IC50 ± SE (nM) | ||
| ONC | — | 1,469 ± 44.50 | 503.2 ± 21.67 | 674.5 ± 99.5 |
| huRFB4 IgG | — | >500 | >500 | >500 |
| SPDP-based 162 kDa ADC | 1 : 1 | 260.0 | >284 | ND |
| SPDP-based 174 kDa ADC | 2 : 1 | 0.68 ± 0.30 | 2.20 ± 2.07 | >390 |
| SPDP-based 186 kDa ADC | 3 : 1 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | >335 |
The concentration required to inhibit cell viability by 50% relative to buffer-treated control cells (IC50) was determined from semilogarithmic plots in which viability as percentage of control was plotted versus the tested protein concentration. IC50 values are expressed as mean ± SE and are derived from at least two independent experiments each performed in triplicate. ND: not determined.