Literature DB >> 26605265

Long-Term Results of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningioma.

Chang Ki Jang1, Hyun Ho Jung1, Jong Hee Chang1, Jin Woo Chang1, Yong Gou Park1, Won Seok Chang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The predominant treatment modality for meningioma is surgical resection. However, gamma knife radiosurgery is also an important treatment modality for meningioma that is small or cannot be completely removed because of its location. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and long-term results of radiosurgical treatment for meningioma in our institution.
METHODS: We studied 628 patients (130 men and 498 women) who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningioma, which is radiologically diagnosed, from Jan 2008 to Nov 2012. We included patients with single lesion meningioma, and followed up after 6 months with imaging, and then at 24 months with a clinical examination. Patients with high-grade meningioma or multiple meningiomas were excluded. We analyzed each of the factors associated with progression free survival. The median patient's age was 56.8 years. Maximal dosage was 27.8 Gy and marginal dosage was 13.9 Gy.
RESULTS: The overall tumor control rate was 95%. Twenty-eight patients (4.4%) showed evidence of tumor recurrence. Ninety-eight patients (15%) developed peritumoral edema (PTE) after gamma-knife surgery; two of them (2%) underwent surgical resections due to PTE. Nine patients had craniotomy and tumor removal after gamma knife surgery.
CONCLUSION: Gamma knife surgery for intracranial meningioma has proven to be a safe and effective treatment tool with successful long-term outcomes. Gamma knife radiosurgery can be especially effective in cases of remnant meningioma after surgical resection or where PTE is not present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meningioma; Radiosurgery; Stereotactic

Year:  2015        PMID: 26605265      PMCID: PMC4656885          DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2015.3.2.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat        ISSN: 2288-2405


INTRODUCTION

Intracranial meningioma makes up 15-20% of primary brain tumors and is the most common primary adult brain tumor [1]. The predominant treatment of intracranial meningioma is surgical resection [23]. However, tumor recurrence or progression can be a significant problem after surgery because of the involvement of adjacent cranial nerves or major intracranial arteries. Treatment of small-size tumors with surgical removal can have complications and may be contentious. In such cases, gamma knife surgery is a feasible alternative treatment modality [45]. Thus, it has become an important management tool for patients with intracranial meningioma. At 5 years after gamma knife surgery, tumor control rates of 90-100% are reported for intracranial meningioma [6789]. However, reports on long-term outcomes for meningioma are limited because of its pathologic characteristics; it is most often benign and so patients do not follow-up at out-patient departments. We reviewed clinical outcomes in 628 consecutive patients with meningioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We studied 628 patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial incidental meningioma from Jan 2008 to Nov 2012 at the Yonsei University College of Medicine. We included patients with single lesion meningioma and followed up after 6 months with imaging, and then at 24 months with a clinical examination. The median patient age at the time of gamma knife treatment was 56.8 years (28-83 years). Of the 628 patients, 130 (20%) were male, and 498 (80%) were female. In cases in which surgery was not performed and histological diagnosis was not obtained, the diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical follow-up was conducted between 1 to 79 months after gamma knife surgery (median 37 months). Prior resections were performed in 131 patients (20.8%). Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from the severance hospital Yonsei University health system (IRB approval number 4-2015-0604).

Gamma knife technique

Tumor locations are listed in Table 1. T1-weighted images with gadobutrol (Gd, Gadovist; Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Leverkusen, Germany) enhancement and T2-weighted images (repetition time 25, field of view 250 mm, matrix: 256×256 mm). Gamma knife surgery was performed using Leksell Gamma Knife type C or Perfexion (Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, Sweden).
Table 1

Demographics for the 628 patients who underwent gamma knife surgery

FactorTotal: 628
GenderMale130
Female498
AgeMean (yr)56.8±11.3
LocationSupratentorial179
Middle cranial fossa143
Cerebellopontine angle100
Parasagittal97
Falx72
Infratentorial convexity31
Intraventricular6
Patients underwent gamma knife surgery after application of local anesthesia for stereotactic head frame. After frame application, MRI was conducted in the axial plane. Conformal and selective dose plans were created, always using multiple isocenters. Dose selection was based on individual factors that included age, prior exposure to radiation therapy, tumor volume, tumor location, and neurological status by using the GammaPlan treatment planning software. The median marginal and maximal dose delivered to the tumor was 13.9 Gy (range, 9 to 19 Gy) and 27.8 Gy (range, 20 to 36 Gy), respectively. Serial imaging follow-ups were performed using MRI to examine changes in tumor volume, peritumoral edema (PTE), and hydrocephalus; CT was performed when the MRI results were in contraindication. Data was analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate analysis was carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Long-term tumor control and radiation-related complication rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate testing was performed using log rank test.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up data was available in 628 patients (130 men and 498 women). Histopathological diagnoses was not confirmed in 300 cases and Grade I meningioma was detected in 128 cases. The overall tumor control rate was 95%. Twenty-eight patients (4%) showed evidence of tumor recurrence. Ninety-eight patients (15%) developed PTE after gamma-knife surgery. Of these, 76 patients were treated with medicines, and 31 of them fully recovered after this treatment. Two patients (2%) had surgical resection for PTE. Overall, the median progression free survival (PFS) time was 75 months, and the overall 5-year PFS (5YR PFS) was 94.7% (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Overall survival. FUD, follow-up duration (months).

The median PFS for patients older and younger than 65 years was 69 and 70.9 months, respectively. The 5YR PFS for patients older and younger than 65 years was 69.0% and 70.9%, respectively (p-value=0.986) (Table 2).
Table 2

Five-year progression free survival (5YR PFS) and medial progression free survival (mPFS) of patients with asymptomatic intracranial meningioma

5YR PFS (%)mPFS (mo)p-value
Age0.986
 65>96.569.0
 65≤94.470.9
Gender0.065
 Male69.1
 Female76.1
PTE<0.001
 Yes85.369.0
 No96.576.0
Surgery0.017
 Previous done81.862.3
 No97.977.4

PTE, peritumoral edema

In men, the median PFS was 69.1 months, while it was 76.1 months for women (p-value=0.065). The median PFS for patients with and without PTE was 85.3 and 96.5 months, respectively. The 5YR PFS of patients with and without PTE was 69.0% and 76.0%, respectively (p-value=0.000) (Table 2). Gamma Knife radiosurgery was the primary treatment for 497 patients (79.2%), while 131 patients (20.8%) had previously undergone open surgery. The mean period to gamma knife surgery after open surgery was 40 months (range, 0 to 227 months). Nine patients underwent craniotomy and tumor removal after gamma knife surgery (Table 2). The medial PFS was 77.4 months for patients for whom the primary treatment was gamma knife surgery and 62.3 months for those who had previously undergone open surgery. The corresponding values for 5YR PFS were 97.9% and 81.8%. The only factors showing tendency for survival in the multivariate analysis was PTE (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis

p-value95% CI
Age over 650.2380.7111.089
Gender0.0860.6611.028
Max dose (Gy)0.4990.7011.189
Marginal dose (Gy)0.1120.9092.500
PTE0.0790.6191.027
Location0.6760.7851.308

CI, confidence interval; PTE, peritumoral edema

DISCUSSION

Over the last two decades, gamma knife surgery has become an alternative component in multimodal management of primary and surgically removed intracranial meningioma. It has been applied frequently in patients in whom the meningioma is located in challenging location, for solitary, small tumors or for patients showing recurrence after incomplete resections [10]. It has been demonstrated to be effective for controlling tumor growth. Most previous studies reporting gamma knife surgery for intracranial meningioma had follow-up periods of fewer than 5 years [7111213]. Only few studies have provided long-term follow-up analysis. In these few studies, the overall tumor control rates were -86-100% with minimal complications to vital structures [1415]. Kondziolka et al. [16] reported patient outcomes at up to 10 years after radiosurgery and found a tumor control rate of 95%. In a study in which adjacent or new tumor growth away from the primary target was considered as treatment failure, the tumor control rate dropped to 89% at 10 years [17]. In the Mayo clinic study of larger (>10 mL) benign meningiomas, Bledsoe et al. [18] reported a tumor control rate of 99% at 7 years and a neurological complication rate of 44% in supratentorial tumors and 18% in skull-base tumors. Further, Han et al. [19] reported outcomes after gamma knife surgery for 63 skull-based meningiomas treated with a mean marginal isodose of 12.7 Gy. The overall tumor control rate was 90%, with follow-up period ranging from 12 to 60 months. In our study, the overall tumor control rate was 95%. Twenty-eight patients (4%) showed evidence of tumor recurrence. Couldwell et al. [20] analyzed patterns for failure after gamma knife surgery for benign meningiomas and reported a higher likelihood of failure in cavernous sinus meningiomas. In a recent study, tumor progression after gamma knife surgery was high in patients treated with incomplete coverage, with cavernous sinus or with meningiomatosis, despite benign tumor histology. Relatively fewer recurrences have been reported for patients with meningiomas who received higher marginal doses (>14 Gy) in comparison with those who received lower doses (10-12 Gy) [14]. Various factors may influence the long-term outcomes and likelihood of complications. Kondziolka et al. [16] reported prior radiation therapy (p<0.0001) and high-grade tumors (p<0.0001) as factors associated with a worse PFS. Age, sex, tumor volume, and margin dose were not associated with PFS. DiBiase et al. [11] reported that male patients and patients with tumor size greater than 10 cc were more likely to have a worse prognosis. The reason for female patients having a higher tumor control rate is unknown, but one hypothesis is related to the presence of hormone receptors in meningiomas. Sexual hormone assays of meningiomas exhibit the presence of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors [21]. Further, patients treated with less conformal plans to cover the dural tail have been reported to have better outcomes. Previous studies demonstrate the need to adequately cover the dural tail in patients treated with gamma knife surgery for benign intracranial meningiomas. Additionally, previous surgery to treat a lesion larger than 10 cc was found to be a significant factor affecting the likelihood of tumor control [11]. Radiation-related complications were associated with tumor location (convexity/falx) and large tumor volume [22]. In our study, previous surgery (Fig. 2) and presence of PTE (Fig. 3) were identified as factors influencing PFS. So we recommend that primary surgery was needed before performing gamma knife surgery if there is PTE. Male patients tended to have poorer PFS than female patients (Fig. 4), although this finding did not reach statistical significance. Further, older patients (≥65) showed similar long-term tumor control rates compared to younger patients (<65). This provides evidence that gamma knife surgery for meningioma is plausible even for elderly patients. The only factor that showed tendency on multivariate analysis was PTE. In this report, patients without PTE had a significantly higher 5YR PFS than those with PTE (96.5% vs. 85.3%, p-value<0.001), and this remained tendency on multivariate analysis (Table 3).
Fig. 2

Influence of primary surgery or post-surgery remnant lesion radiation on progression free survival. FUD, follow-up duration (months).

Fig. 3

Influence of peritumoral edema on progression free survival. FUD, follow-up duration (months).

Fig. 4

Influence of gender on progression free survival. FUD, follow-up duration (months).

Our study does have some limitations. It was retrospective and involved cases that were not confirmed by histopathology. Specifically, for 500 cases, histological confirmation was not obtained. Of the 128 cases that were histopathologically confirmed, 100 were of World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, 25 were of WHO grade II, and 3 were of WHO grade III. A small percentage of meningiomas appear to have malignant potential [2324]. According to the literature on meningioma, diverse behaviors of the tumors are described. One of our patients, a 62-year-old man, received gamma knife surgery for a parasagittal meningioma with invasion of the superior sagittal sinus (Fig. 5A). After 32 months, follow-up with MRI revealed increasing tumor size with PTE (Fig. 5B). We performed total resection of that lesion, which had atypical pathology for meningioma (WHO grade III) (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5

Magnetic resonance images of a representative case. A 62-year-old man received gamma knife surgery for parasagittal meningioma with invasion of superior sagittal sinus. A: Axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) image obtained in Dec 2006 showing homogeneous enhancing round mass with invasion of superior sagittal sinus. B: Axial T1-weighted MR image from Aug 2009 (post gamma knife surgery 32 months) showing increased heterogeneous enhancing round mass with aggravated peritumoral edema. C: Axial T1-weighted MR image from Sep 2009 (post-operation) showing no remnant lesion.

According to our results, gamma knife surgery for intracranial meningioma is safe and effective with successful long-term outcomes. It can be a highly effective treatment modality particularly in cases of remnant meningioma after surgical resection as well as in cases without PTE.
  24 in total

1.  Long-term Outcomes After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Meningiomas.

Authors:  Douglas Kondziolka; Agam D Patel; Hideyuki Kano; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Single-fraction radiosurgery for presumed intracranial meningiomas: efficacy and complications from a 22-year experience.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock; Scott L Stafford; Michael J Link; Yolanda I Garces; Robert L Foote
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiosurgical treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: experience with 122 treated patients.

Authors:  Antonio Nicolato; Roberto Foroni; Franco Alessandrini; Albino Bricolo; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Analysis of treatment outcome after stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas.

Authors:  M Shin; H Kurita; T Sasaki; S Kawamoto; M Tago; N Kawahara; A Morita; K Ueki; T Kirino
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery.

Authors:  William T Couldwell; Chad D Cole; Ossama Al-Mefty
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Radiosurgery for large-volume (> 10 cm3) benign meningiomas.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bledsoe; Michael J Link; Scott L Stafford; Paul J Park; Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Gamma knife radiosurgery of imaging-diagnosed intracranial meningioma.

Authors:  John C Flickinger; Douglas Kondziolka; Ann H Maitz; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A phase II evaluation of tamoxifen in unresectable or refractory meningiomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  J W Goodwin; J Crowley; H J Eyre; B Stafford; K A Jaeckle; J J Townsend
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Cavernous sinus meningiomas--what is the strategy: upfront or adjuvant gamma knife surgery?

Authors:  G Pendl; O Schröttner; S Eustacchio; J C Ganz; K Feichtinger
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 10.  Surgical management of jugular foramen meningiomas: a series of 13 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mario Sanna; Andrea Bacciu; Maurizio Falcioni; Abdelkader Taibah; Paolo Piazza
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

1.  Radiation of meningioma dural tail may not improve tumor control rates.

Authors:  Keenan Piper; Siyuan Yu; Mohammad Taghvaei; Christian Fernandez; Nikolaos Mouchtouris; Rupert D Smit; Clifford Yudkoff; Sarah Collopy; Maikerly Reyes; Pascal Lavergne; Michael Karsy; Giyarpuram N Prashant; Wenyin Shi; James Evans
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Malignant transformation of WHO grade I meningiomas after surgery or radiosurgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Satoshi Nakasu; Akifumi Notsu; Kiyong Na; Yoko Nakasu
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-10-16

3.  Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery of Grade I Intracranial Meningiomas.

Authors:  Sara Alatriste-Martínez; Sergio Moreno-Jiménez; Guillermo A Gutiérrez-Aceves; José de Jesús Suárez-Campos; Olivia Amanda García-Garduño; Alejandro Rosas-Cabral; Miguel Ángel Celis-López
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 4.  Ten-year follow-up after Gamma Knife radiosurgery of meningioma and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bodo E Lippitz; Jiri Bartek; Tiit Mathiesen; Petter Förander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Induced Higher-Grade Transformation of a Benign Meningioma into Atypical Meningioma.

Authors:  Ali Basalamah; Mohammed Al-Bolbol; Osman Ahmed; Nagoud Ali; Sabah Al-Rashed
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  A 10-Year Scientometrics Analysis of Brain Tumors Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Visualization, Characteristics, and Scientific Trends.

Authors:  Walkiria Garcia-Fuentes; Leonardo Espinoza-Rodriguez; Arnaldo Munive-Degregori; Cesar Mauricio-Vilchez; Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Frank Mayta-Tovalino
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Pseudoprogression and peritumoral edema due to intratumoral necrosis after Gamma knife radiosurgery for meningioma.

Authors:  In-Ho Jung; Kyung Won Chang; So Hee Park; Hyun Ho Jung; Jong Hee Chang; Jin Woo Chang; Won Seok Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT Follow Up after Single or Hypofractionated Gamma Knife ICON Radiosurgery for Meningioma Patients.

Authors:  Fabio Barone; Francesco Inserra; Gianluca Scalia; Massimo Ippolito; Sebastiano Cosentino; Antonio Crea; Maria Gabriella Sabini; Lucia Valastro; Iolanda Valeria Patti; Stefania Mele; Grazia Acquaviva; Alessandra Tocco; Maria Tamburo; Francesca Graziano; Ottavio S Tomasi; Rosario Maugeri; Gerardo Iacopino; Salvatore Cicero; Lidia Strigari; Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.