Corrado Giuliani1, Cees A Swenne2, Sumche Man2, Angela Agostinelli1, Sandro Fioretti1,3, Francesco Di Nardo1, Laura Burattini1,3. 1. Department of Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. 2. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. B.M.E.D. Bio-Medical Engineering Development SRL, Department of Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Defects of cardiac repolarization, noninvasively identifiable by analyzing the electrocardiographic (ECG) ST segment and T wave, are among the major causes of sudden cardiac death. Still, no repolarization-based index has so far shown sufficient sensitivity and specificity to justify preventive treatments. Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate the predictive power of our recently proposed f99 index for the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Our study populations included 170 patients with implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD), 44 of which developed ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation during the 4-year follow-up (ICD_Cases) and 126 did not (ICD_Controls). The f99 index, defined as the frequency at which the repolarization normalized cumulative energy reaches 99%, was computed in each of the 15 (I to III, aVl, aVr, aVf, V1 -V6 , X, Y, Z) available ECG leads independently, and then maximized over the 6 precordial leads (f99_MaxV1 -V6 ), 12 standard leads (f99_Max12STD) and three orthogonal leads (f99_MaxXYZ) to avoid dispersion-related issues. Each index predictive power was quantified as the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Median f99_MaxV1 -V6 , f99_Max12STD and f99_MaxXYZ values were significantly higher in the ICD_Cases than in the ICD_Controls (48 Hz vs. 35 Hz, P<0.05; 51 Hz vs. 43 Hz, P<0.05; 45 Hz vs. 31 Hz, P<10(-3) ; respectively), indicating a more fragmented repolarization in the former group. The AUC values were 0.62, 0.63 and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The f99 represents a promising risk index for the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, especially when maximized over the three orthogonal leads.
BACKGROUND: Defects of cardiac repolarization, noninvasively identifiable by analyzing the electrocardiographic (ECG) ST segment and T wave, are among the major causes of sudden cardiac death. Still, no repolarization-based index has so far shown sufficient sensitivity and specificity to justify preventive treatments. Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate the predictive power of our recently proposed f99 index for the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Our study populations included 170 patients with implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD), 44 of which developed ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation during the 4-year follow-up (ICD_Cases) and 126 did not (ICD_Controls). The f99 index, defined as the frequency at which the repolarization normalized cumulative energy reaches 99%, was computed in each of the 15 (I to III, aVl, aVr, aVf, V1 -V6 , X, Y, Z) available ECG leads independently, and then maximized over the 6 precordial leads (f99_MaxV1 -V6 ), 12 standard leads (f99_Max12STD) and three orthogonal leads (f99_MaxXYZ) to avoid dispersion-related issues. Each index predictive power was quantified as the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Median f99_MaxV1 -V6 , f99_Max12STD and f99_MaxXYZ values were significantly higher in the ICD_Cases than in the ICD_Controls (48 Hz vs. 35 Hz, P<0.05; 51 Hz vs. 43 Hz, P<0.05; 45 Hz vs. 31 Hz, P<10(-3) ; respectively), indicating a more fragmented repolarization in the former group. The AUC values were 0.62, 0.63 and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The f99 represents a promising risk index for the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, especially when maximized over the three orthogonal leads.
Authors: J C Cowan; K Yusoff; M Moore; P A Amos; A E Gold; J P Bourke; S Tansuphaswadikul; R W Campbell Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1988-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Sumche Man; Priscilla V De Winter; Arie C Maan; Joep Thijssen; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Wilbert P M van Meerwijk; Marianne Bootsma; Lieselot van Erven; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Laura Burattini; Roberto Burattini; Cees A Swenne Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Johanna Leino; Mikko Minkkinen; Tuomo Nieminen; Terho Lehtimäki; Jari Viik; Rami Lehtinen; Kjell Nikus; Tiit Kööbi; Väinö Turjanmaa; Richard L Verrier; Mika Kähönen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 6.343