Kathryn M Hatch1, Tim Schultz2, Jonathan H Talamo2, H Burkhard Dick2. 1. From the Department of Ophthalmology (Hatch, Talamo), Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; the Institute of Vision Science (Schultz, Dick), Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum, Germany. Electronic address: kathryn_hatch@meei.harvard.edu. 2. From the Department of Ophthalmology (Hatch, Talamo), Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; the Institute of Vision Science (Schultz, Dick), Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) for the removal of brunescent cataracts treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with standard cataract phacoemulsification techniques. SETTING: Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum, Germany. DESIGN: Comparative prospective case study. METHODS: The Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) grading system was used to measure eyes divided into 4 groups having cataract surgery. Groups 1 and 2 contained eyes with LOCS III grade nuclear opalescence (NO) 3 cataracts treated with standard cataract surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, respectively. Groups 3 and 4 contained brunescent cataracts, LOCS III grades NO5, treated with standard cataract surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, respectively. RESULTS: There were 240 eyes, with 60 eyes in each group. The EPT in Group 1 ranged from 0.46 to 3.10 (mean 1.38); the EPT in all eyes in Group 2 was 0 (P < .001). The EPT in Groups 3 and 4 was 2.12 to 19.29 (mean 6.85) and 0 to 6.75 (mean 1.35), respectively (P < .001). A comparison between EPT in Groups 1 and 4 showed that EPT in Group 4 was also lower than in Group 1 (P = .013). Groups 4 and 1 were the most statistically similar of all groups compared, suggesting that EPT for a femtosecond laser-treated grade 5 cataract was most similar to that of a standard-treated grade 3 cataract. CONCLUSION: Femtosecond laser pretreatment for brunescent cataracts allowed for a significant reduction in EPT compared with manual standard phacoemulsification techniques. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Hatch, Talamo, and Dick are consultants to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. Dr. Schultz has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To compare effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) for the removal of brunescent cataracts treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with standard cataract phacoemulsification techniques. SETTING: Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum, Germany. DESIGN: Comparative prospective case study. METHODS: The Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) grading system was used to measure eyes divided into 4 groups having cataract surgery. Groups 1 and 2 contained eyes with LOCS III grade nuclear opalescence (NO) 3 cataracts treated with standard cataract surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, respectively. Groups 3 and 4 contained brunescent cataracts, LOCS III grades NO5, treated with standard cataract surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, respectively. RESULTS: There were 240 eyes, with 60 eyes in each group. The EPT in Group 1 ranged from 0.46 to 3.10 (mean 1.38); the EPT in all eyes in Group 2 was 0 (P < .001). The EPT in Groups 3 and 4 was 2.12 to 19.29 (mean 6.85) and 0 to 6.75 (mean 1.35), respectively (P < .001). A comparison between EPT in Groups 1 and 4 showed that EPT in Group 4 was also lower than in Group 1 (P = .013). Groups 4 and 1 were the most statistically similar of all groups compared, suggesting that EPT for a femtosecond laser-treated grade 5 cataract was most similar to that of a standard-treated grade 3 cataract. CONCLUSION: Femtosecond laser pretreatment for brunescent cataracts allowed for a significant reduction in EPT compared with manual standard phacoemulsification techniques. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Hatch, Talamo, and Dick are consultants to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. Dr. Schultz has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: Tsontcho Ianchulev; David F Chang; Edward Koo; Susan MacDonald; Ernesto Calvo; Farrell Toby Tyson; Andrea Vasquez; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Robert Edward Ty Ang; Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto; Emerson Marquez Cruz; Mark Christian Reyes Rivera; Gladness Henna Austria Martinez Journal: Eye Vis (Lond) Date: 2018-04-23