Literature DB >> 26603390

Prevalence of laser vision correction in ophthalmologists who perform refractive surgery.

Guy M Kezirian1, Gregory D Parkhurst2, Jason P Brinton2, Richard A Norden2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of laser corneal refractive surgery (laser vision correction [LVC]) among ophthalmologists who perform these procedures and to assess the willingness of these ophthalmologists to recommend LVC to immediate family members.
SETTING: Online survey with results analyzed at Surgivision Consultants, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized questionnaire study.
METHODS: The 22-question Global Survey on Refractive Surgery in Refractive Surgeons was sent by e-mail to 250 ophthalmologists randomly selected from a database of 2441 ophthalmologists known to have performed LVC at some point in the past decade. Responses were solicited by e-mail, with subsequent telephone reminders to nonresponders.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 248 (99.2%) of 250 queried individuals, of which 232 (92.8%) met the protocol criteria of currently working as refractive surgeons. Of the 232 subjects, 161 (69.4%) reported that they had refractive errors potentially amenable to treatment with LVC, not including presbyopia. Of the 161 ophthalmologists with treatable refractive errors, 54 (33.5%) reported they were not candidates for LVC for a variety of reasons and 107 (66.5%) reported they were candidates for LVC. Of the LVC candidates, 62.6% reported that they had an LVC procedure in their own eyes. Of the overall 232 subjects, more than 90% recommend LVC for adult members of their immediate family.
CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists who perform LVC were significantly more likely than the general population to have LVC in their own eyes. The prevalence of refractive errors was significantly higher among ophthalmologists performing refractive surgery than in the general population. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26603390     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

Review 1.  Stereopsis after corneal refractive surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Peyman; Mohsen Pourazizi; Mohamadreza Akhlaghi; Awat Feizi; Alireza Rahimi; Elham Soltani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Growing refractive surgery.

Authors:  Arthur B Cummings
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Iberoamerican Ophthalmologists IOL Selection for Use on Themselves: Survey Results.

Authors:  Daniel Scorsetti; Eduardo Viteri; Eduardo Mayorga
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Deep learning models for screening of high myopia using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kyung Jun Choi; Jung Eun Choi; Hyeon Cheol Roh; Jun Soo Eun; Jong Min Kim; Yong Kyun Shin; Min Chae Kang; Joon Kyo Chung; Chaeyeon Lee; Dongyoung Lee; Se Woong Kang; Baek Hwan Cho; Sang Jin Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessment of Scleral Contour Changes in High Myopia by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Yong Kyun Shin; Se Woong Kang; Sang Jin Kim; Geun Woo Lee; Kyung Jun Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Helen Chung; Emi Sanders; Guillermo Rocha; Jamie Bhamra
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.