Literature DB >> 26603047

The causes and prognoses of different types of fractures in wild koalas submitted to wildlife hospitals.

Joerg Henning1, Christabel Hannon2, Allan McKinnon3, Rebecca Larkin3, Rachel Allavena2.   

Abstract

Fractures are a major problem in wild koalas of great veterinary and conservation importance as their occurrence in different locations of the body might result in varying healing success. The aim of this study was to determine the fracture types (defined by location of the fracture) occurring in wild koalas, temporal patterns, possible causes and risk factors of fracture types, and the prognosis for successfully releasing kolas with healed fracture types into the wild. Data from a total of 2031 wild koalas submitted to wildlife hospitals in South-East Queensland, Australia, over a period of 13 years were analysed. Approximately 56.7% of koalas experienced head fractures, 13.4% had torso fractures, 14.9% had limb fractures and 15% had combination fractures. A total of 84.1% of fractures were caused by vehicle collisions, 9.1% by dog attacks, 3.3% by falls from trees, 1.3% by train collisions, 0.2% by livestock trampling and 1.8% due to unknown causes. Multinominal logistic regression was used to identify risk factors (cause of fracture, age category, sex, year, three-year admission period and season of fracture event) by fracture type. The type of fracture was associated with both the cause of the fracture and the season when it occurred: for example torso fractures (compared to combination fractures) were associated with dog attacks (OR=10.98; 95% CI6.03, 20.01) and falls from trees (OR=4.79; 95% CI2.26, 10.19) relative to vehicle collisions. More submissions of koalas with head fractures due to vehicle collisions occurred in spring compared to autumn and winter, coinciding with the breeding season of koalas and increased animal movement. Prognosis for koalas with fractures was poor, with approximately 63.8% of koalas admitted dead on arrival, 34.2% euthanised, and only 2.0% of koalas able to be released. Given this data, further research into mitigation strategies to decrease the risk of fractures and to increase the observed low recovery rate should be considered.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Cause; Fracture; Koala; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26603047     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  4 in total

1.  The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations.

Authors:  Ravi Bandara Dissanayake; Mark Stevenson; Rachel Allavena; Joerg Henning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Insights from Koala-Cattle Interaction Experiments: Koalas and Cattle May See Each Other as a Disturbance.

Authors:  Alex Zijian Jiang; Andrew Tribe; Clive J C Phillips; Peter J Murray
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Seasonal Variations of Faecal Cortisol Metabolites in Koalas in South East Queensland.

Authors:  Flavia Santamaria; Rupert Palme; Rolf Schlagloth; Edith Klobetz-Rassam; Joerg Henning
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Over Time Decay of Cortisol Metabolites in Faecal Pellets of Koalas in Central Queensland.

Authors:  Flavia Santamaria; Rolf Schlagloth; Rupert Palme; Joerg Henning
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.