Literature DB >> 26603043

Revisiting the importance of common body motion in human action perception.

Steven M Thurman1, Hongjing Lu2,3.   

Abstract

Human actions are complex dynamic stimuli comprised of two principle motion components: 1) common body motion, which represents the translation of the body when a person moves through space, and 2) relative limb movements, resulting from articulation of limbs after factoring out common body motion. Historically, most research in biological motion has focused primarily on relative limb movements while discounting the role of common body motion in human action perception. The current study examined the relative contribution of posture change resulting from relative limb movements and translation of body position resulting from common body motion in discriminating human walking versus running actions. We found that faster translation speeds of common body motion evoked significantly more responses consistent with running when discriminating ambiguous actions morphed between walking and running. Furthermore, this influence was systematically modulated by the uncertainty associated with intrinsic cues as determined by the degree of limited-lifetime spatial sampling. The contribution of common body motion increased monotonically as the reliability of inferring posture changes on the basis of intrinsic cues decreased. These results highlight the importance of translational body movements and their interaction with posture change as a result of relative limb movements in discriminating human actions when visual input information is sparse and noisy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D shape and form; Biological motion; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26603043     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-1031-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

1.  Combining biological motion perception with optic flow analysis for self-motion in crowds.

Authors:  Anna-Gesina Hülemeier; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Pitting optic flow, object motion, and biological motion against each other.

Authors:  Krischan Koerfer; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Flow parsing and biological motion.

Authors:  Katja M Mayer; Hugh Riddell; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.