Literature DB >> 26602896

A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice.

Marianne Huebner1, Werner Vach2, Saskia le Cessie3.   

Abstract

Initial data analysis is conducted independently of the analysis needed to address the research questions. Shortcomings in these first steps may result in inappropriate statistical methods or incorrect conclusions. We outline a framework for initial data analysis and illustrate the impact of initial data analysis on research studies. Examples of reporting of initial data analysis in publications are given. A systematic and careful approach to initial data analysis is needed as good research practice.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  data cleaning; data screening; initial data analysis

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26602896     DOI： 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN： 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  8 in total

1.  A Very Short List of Common Pitfalls in Research Design, Data Analysis, and Reporting.

Authors:  Maarten van Smeden
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Nasopharyngeal swabs vs. saliva sampling for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A cross-sectional survey of acceptability for caregivers and children after experiencing both methods.

Authors:  François Gagnon; Maala Bhatt; Roger Zemek; Richard J Webster; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki; Stuart Harman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Data cleaning and management protocols for linked perinatal research data: a good practice example from the Smoking MUMS (Maternal Use of Medications and Safety) Study.

Authors:  Duong Thuy Tran; Alys Havard; Louisa R Jorm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Which neural mechanisms mediate the effects of a parenting intervention program on parenting behavior: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Kolijn; Saskia Euser; Bianca G van den Bulk; Renske Huffmeijer; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2017-03-21

5.  Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hoffmann; Ute Latza; Sebastian E Baumeister; Martin Brünger; Nina Buttmann-Schweiger; Juliane Hardt; Verena Hoffmann; André Karch; Adrian Richter; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Irene Schmidtmann; Enno Swart; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Maarten van Smeden; Georg Heinze; Ben Van Calster; Folkert W Asselbergs; Panos E Vardas; Nico Bruining; Peter de Jaegere; Jason H Moore; Spiros Denaxas; Anne Laure Boulesteix; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 35.855

7.  Efficacy of the Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline in Twin Families (VIPP-Twins): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Saskia Euser; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Bianca G van den Bulk; Mariëlle Linting; Rani C Damsteegt; Claudia I Vrijhof; Ilse C van Wijk; Eveline A Crone; Marinus H van IJzendoorn
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-06-06

8.  Differences in organization of care are associated with mortality, severe complication and failure to rescue in emergency colon cancer surgery.

Authors:  Daniëlle D Huijts; Jan Willem T Dekker; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Julia T van Groningen; Esther Bastiaannet; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.038
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.