Literature DB >> 26602886

Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch.

C P Johnson1, J J Schiller2, Y R Zhu1, S Hariharan3, A M Roza1, D C Cronin1, B D Shames1, T M Ellis1.   

Abstract

Solid phase immunoassays (SPI) are now routinely used to detect HLA antibodies. However, the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains the established method for assessing final donor-recipient compatibility. Since 2005 we have followed a protocol whereby the final allocation decision for renal transplantation is based on SPI (not the FCXM). Here we report long-term graft outcomes for 508 consecutive kidney transplants using this protocol. All recipients were negative for donor-specific antibody by SPI. Primary outcomes are graft survival and incidence of acute rejection within 1 year (AR <1 year) for FCXM+ (n = 54) and FCXM- (n = 454) recipients. Median follow-up is 7.1 years. FCXM+ recipients were significantly different from FCXM- recipients for the following risk factors: living donor (24% vs. 39%, p = 0.03), duration of dialysis (31.0 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.008), retransplants (17% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.04), % sensitized (63% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and PRA >80% (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, 5-year actual graft survival rates are 87% and 84%, respectively. AR <1 year occurred in 13% FCXM+ and 12% FCXM- recipients. Crossmatch status was not associated with graft outcomes in any univariate or multivariate model. Renal transplantation can be performed successfully, using SPI as the definitive test for donor-recipient compatibility. © Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26602886     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  6 in total

1.  The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?

Authors:  Harold C Sullivan; Scott M Krummey; Howard M Gebel; Robert A Bray
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 2.  Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Madhu C Bhaskaran; Sebastiaan Heidt; Thangamani Muthukumar
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Trends and impact on cold ischemia time and clinical outcomes using virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Dana Jorgensen; Jonathan G Yabes; Kwonho Jeong; Adriana Zeevi; John Lunz; Amit D Tevar; Michele Molinari; Sumit Mohan; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 18.998

Review 4.  Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay.

Authors:  Brian D Tait
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Pretreatment on Single-Antigen Bead Assay.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Sue Pang; Donna Phelan; Daniel C Brennan; Thalachallour Mohanakumar
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-07-11

6.  Technical and clinical aspects of the histocompatibility crossmatch assay in solid organ transplantation

Authors:  Ana María Arrunátegui; Daniel S Ramón; Luz Marina Viola; Linda G Olsen; Andrés Jaramillo
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.