Courtney C Moreno1, Pardeep K Mittal2, Patrick S Sullivan3, Robin Rutherford4, Charles A Staley3, Kenneth Cardona3, Natalyn N Hawk5, W Thomas Dixon2, Hiroumi D Kitajima2, Jian Kang6, William C Small2, John Oshinski2, John R Votaw2. 1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: courtney.moreno@emoryhealthcare.org. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 3. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 4. Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 5. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 6. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer screening history was also recorded. RESULTS: The study population was 54% male (265 of 492) with a mean age of 58.9 years (range, 25-93 years). Initial tissue diagnosis was established at the time of screening colonoscopy in 10.7%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 79.2%, and during emergent surgery in 7.1%. Cancers diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy were more likely to be stage 1 than cancers diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy or emergent surgery (38.5%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm for the screening colonoscopy group, 4.6 cm for the diagnostic colonoscopy group, and 5.0 cm for the emergent surgery group. At least 31% of patients diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy, 19% of patients diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy, and 26% of patients diagnosed at the time of emergent surgery had never undergone a screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 90% of colorectal cancer patients were diagnosed after development of symptoms and had more advanced disease than asymptomatic screening patients. Colorectal cancer outcomes will be improved by improving rates of colorectal cancer screening.
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer screening history was also recorded. RESULTS: The study population was 54% male (265 of 492) with a mean age of 58.9 years (range, 25-93 years). Initial tissue diagnosis was established at the time of screening colonoscopy in 10.7%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 79.2%, and during emergent surgery in 7.1%. Cancers diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy were more likely to be stage 1 than cancers diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy or emergent surgery (38.5%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm for the screening colonoscopy group, 4.6 cm for the diagnostic colonoscopy group, and 5.0 cm for the emergent surgery group. At least 31% of patients diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy, 19% of patients diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy, and 26% of patients diagnosed at the time of emergent surgery had never undergone a screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 90% of colorectal cancerpatients were diagnosed after development of symptoms and had more advanced disease than asymptomatic screening patients. Colorectal cancer outcomes will be improved by improving rates of colorectal cancer screening.
Authors: J F Huisman; L W Leicher; E de Boer; H L van Westreenen; J W de Groot; F A Holman; P C van de Meeberg; Pejm Sallevelt; Kcmj Peeters; Mnjm Wasser; Hfa Vasen; W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Zeta Chow; Patrick Osterhaus; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Nancy Schoenberg; Mark Dignan; B Mark Evers; Avinash Bhakta Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Han-Gil Kim; Seung Yoon Yang; Yoon Dae Han; Min Soo Cho; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Hyuk Hur Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jeroen H A Creemers; W Joost Lesterhuis; Niven Mehra; Winald R Gerritsen; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries; Johannes Textor Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Nicolás M González-Senac; Jennifer Mayordomo-Cava; Angela Macías-Valle; Paula Aldama-Marín; Sara Majuelos González; María Luisa Cruz Arnés; Luis M Jiménez-Gómez; María T Vidán-Astiz; José Antonio Serra-Rexach Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.390