Literature DB >> 26602325

Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome?

K Delli1, C Livas2, A Vissink1, F K L Spijkervet1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess the characteristics of YouTube videos dealing with Sjögren's syndrome. MATERIALS &
METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was performed for 'Sjögren's syndrome' in YouTube. After excluding duplicates, irrelevant videos, and non-English-language domains, 70 videos were included for analysis. Videos were classified as useful, misleading, or personal experience. The overall quality of videos was scored according to the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Useful videos were assessed for reliability and comprehensiveness based on two 5-point scales. Key points of the misleading videos were explored and patients' personal experiences were further investigated.
RESULTS: Thirty-six videos (51.4%) were classified as useful, 6 (8.6%) as misleading, and 28 (40%) as patient's personal experience. Independent users tend to upload videos with personal experience, while university channels/professional organizations share useful videos with evidence-based information. Significant difference was observed in GQS among useful, misleading videos, and patient's experiences. The mean reliability, comprehensiveness, and GQS scores of useful videos were 2.5 (s.d.:1.2), 2.6 (s.d.:1.4), and 3.4 (s.d.:1.0), respectively, whereas only six videos (16.7%) were rated as complete vis-à-vis content. The most frequently misleading topics were etiology and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Specialists should refer their patients to validated e-information resources and actively participate in the development of video-sharing platforms.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sjögren's syndrome; YouTube; e-health; oral medicine; patient education; quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26602325     DOI: 10.1111/odi.12404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  31 in total

1.  YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners.

Authors:  Gokay Ustdal; Ayca Ustdal Guney
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The usefulness and validity of English-language videos on YouTube as an educational resource for spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Sakktivel Elangovan; Yu Heng Kwan; Warren Fong
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

Authors:  Kimberly Haslam; Heather Doucette; Shauna Hachey; Teanne MacCallum; Denise Zwicker; Martha Smith-Brilliant; Robert Gilbert
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2019-02-01

4.  YouTube as a Source of Information on Echocardiography: Content and Quality Analysis.

Authors:  Ercan Aydın; Emre Yılmaz
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.672

5.  English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections.

Authors:  Sena Tolu; Ozan Volkan Yurdakul; Betul Basaran; Aylin Rezvani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Popular videos related to low back pain on YouTube™ do not reflect current clinical guidelines: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laísa B Maia; Juliana P Silva; Mateus B Souza; Nicholas Henschke; Vinicius C Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  "My Invisalign experience": content, metrics and comment sentiment analysis of the most popular patient testimonials on YouTube.

Authors:  Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli; Nikolaos Pandis
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Hu; Hui Pan; Wenxiu He; Hong Hua; Zhimin Yan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Simon M Mueller; Valentina N S Hongler; Pierre Jungo; Lucian Cajacob; Simon Schwegler; Esther H Steveling; Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas; Oliver Fuchs; Alexander Navarini; Kathrin Scherer; Oliver Brandt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Assessment of the Quality, Understandability, and Reliability of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Basal Cell Carcinoma: Web-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Theresa Steeb; Lydia Reinhardt; Matthias Harlaß; Markus Vincent Heppt; Friedegund Meier; Carola Berking
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.