Literature DB >> 26602303

Assessing Maternal Capabilities in the SHINE Trial: Highlighting a Hidden Link in the Causal Pathway to Child Health.

Cynthia R Matare1, Mduduzi N N Mbuya2, Gretel Pelto1, Katherine L Dickin1, Rebecca J Stoltzfus1.   

Abstract

A potential bottleneck for increasing the adoption of child health interventions has been limited attention to designing actions that are built on the essential role that caregivers play in determining their effectiveness. In the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial, we utilize the concept of maternal capabilities to examine participants' skills and attributes that affect their ability to provide appropriate care for their young child, fully engage with trial interventions, and influence the response to these interventions at the household level. We hypothesize that the impact of SHINE interventions on child stunting and anemia will be modified by these maternal capabilities. Drawing upon multiple theories, we identify and define critical maternal capabilities domains, and describe how they are measured in the trial. Description of maternal capabilities and their role as potential modifiers on impact will increase understanding of the impact of SHINE interventions, and the generalizability of our findings.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregiver capabilities; child caregiving; impact evaluation; intervention design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26602303      PMCID: PMC4657596          DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


The health, nutrition, and other developmental opportunities afforded to a child from conception until the age of 2 years are critically important to their immediate and long-term well-being [1]. Undernutrition continues to be a public health problem in developing countries, and is a leading cause of disability and death in young children [1]. Among preschool-aged children, 165 million children are stunted [2], close to 300 million are anemic [3], >50 million are wasted [4], and 45% of all deaths in this age group can be attributed to these and other forms of undernutrition [2]. Zimbabwe, like other developing countries, has a high burden of undernutrition among preschool-aged children; about 10% have a low birth weight, a third have stunted growth, and more than half (56%) are anemic [5]. In Zimbabwe, child feeding practices in the first 2 years are suboptimal: 5.8% of children were exclusively breastfed for 6 months (despite of high breastfeeding initiation and continuation), and 8.4% of children between 6 and 23 months of age received a minimal acceptable diet (an indicator that combines both dietary diversity and meal frequency) [6]. Although a great deal is known about what needs to be done to improve the nutrition of women and young children [7], and political will to address this is issue is growing (for example, 55 countries have committed to the Scaling Up Nutrition movement) [8], progress in tackling malnutrition has been slow, evidenced by the fact that only 1 country (Colombia) is on track to meet the nutrition targets set by the World Health Assembly [9]. One reason for this could be the lack of consideration for the important role that behavioral factors play in ensuring the healthy growth for infants and young children, specifically the preventive, disease management, and healthcare-seeking behaviors performed by their caregivers. The basic conceptual framework linking caregivers at the household level to nutrition outcomes was effectively articulated >25 years ago. In this framework, care was defined as the “provision in the household and the community of time, attention, and support to meet the physical, mental, and social needs of the growing child and other household members” [10], or more simply, the practices that “translate food security and healthcare resources into a child's well-being” [11]. In many contexts, the mother is the primary caregiver, and therefore has a central role in determining the infant's health and nutritional outcomes. In some cases, others (eg, fathers and grandparents) are also primary caregivers, but in more cases, they act as secondary caregivers, assisting the mother or sharing the role of caregiver. The Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in Zimbabwe is implementing 2 packages of interventions, one targeting infant and young child feeding (IYCF) and the other targeting water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) behaviors, with the primary goal of reducing stunting and anemia at 18 months of age. These SHINE interventions are in line with 3 of the 13 interventions that have been identified as being feasible and cost-effective and fall under the broader category of promoting good nutritional practices [7]. The behaviors promoted through the SHINE trial interventions are particularly aimed at minimizing the ingestion of fecal matter by and improving the hygienic care of infants and young children, thereby reducing the risk for diarrheal and other infectious diseases. All of these behaviors also require deliberate action to be taken by a caregiver, if they are to impact the health and growth of the child. In view of this, it is essential to understand caregivers and their capabilities as the most proximal participants in the delivery of these interventions. In doing so, researchers will be better equipped to develop programs that facilitate the adoption of and compliance with appropriate behaviors for child health. As such, the SHINE trial program impact pathway (PIP) considers a specific set of maternal attributes, which we have broadly named “caregiver capabilities.” An exploration of caregiver capabilities is the focus of this article, as we view them as important effect modifiers in the SHINE PIP [12].

THE CAREGIVER CAPABILITIES FRAMEWORK

The caregiver capabilities framework builds on work by several theorists, notably Engle et al [13], who extended the 1990 UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) framework to define several resources a caregiver would need to provide appropriate care, and Nussbaum, whose conceptualization of the human capabilities approach [14] included a defined list of capabilities [15]. These resources for care and human capabilities are summarized in Table 1. Marrying these concepts, we have adopted the term “caregiver capabilities” to broadly represent the skills and attributes of a caregiver that determine their ability to care for a young child in ways that produce positive nutrition, health, and development outcomes (Caregiver Capabilities Working Group, Cornell). This characterization of caregiver capabilities leads to the proposition that child health and nutrition interventions will have limited utility if caregiver capabilities are low and not addressed by the intervention. Therefore, child health and nutrition outcomes can be improved by increasing the resources that caregivers have access to, or by improving caregiver capabilities, or a combination of both.
Table 1.

List of Resources for Care and the Human Capability Set

Resources for CareHuman Capability Set
Education, knowledge, and beliefsLife
Health and good nutritional statusBodily health
Mental health/lack of stressBodily integrity
Autonomy, control of resources, and intrahousehold allocationSenses, imagination, and thought
Workloads and time availabilityEmotions
Social support from family members and communityPractical reason
Control of resources and intra-household allocationAffiliation
Self-efficacyOther species
Play
Control over one's environment
List of Resources for Care and the Human Capability Set In the context of the SHINE trial, all caregivers enrolled in the study and from whom data are being collected are mothers. In acknowledgement of this fact, in this article we refer to caregiver capabilities specifically as maternal capabilities. The SHINE trial selected a subset of maternal capabilities as the focus of attention. These are: mental health (depressive symptoms), stress, perceived physical health, autonomy, perceived social support, mothering self-efficacy, time use, and perceived time stress. From this list, we define positive maternal capabilities as “having good physical health,” “low levels of depressive symptoms,” “less stress,” “more social support,” “high levels of mothering self-efficacy,” and “being more autonomous.” Drawing from multiple sources of theory and empirical research, these indicators are defined in Table 2 and brief summary justifications follow.
Table 2.

Definitions of Constructs Comprising Caregiver Capabilities

ConstructDefinition
Perceived physical healthPerceptions of one's physical well-being
Mental health [16]A state of well-being in which an individual can realize their abilities, cope with the normal stresses of life, work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to their community
Stress [17]The emotional experience triggered by events or other stimuli and accompanied by specific biochemical, physiological, and behavioral changes
Perceived social support [18]Perceived exchanges of physical and psychosocial resources provided through a process of interaction in relationships, which leads to improved coping, esteem, belonging, and competence
Decision-making autonomy [19]The capacity to manipulate one's environment through control over resources and information to make decisions about one's own concerns or about close family members
Gender norm attitudes [20]Traditional or egalitarian beliefs about male and female gender norms
Time useThe allocation of time to different activities
Perceived time stressThe caregiver's perceptions of the adequacy of the time they have to attend to their different roles
Mothering self-efficacy [21]The degree to which parents perceive themselves as capable and effective in the parenting role
Definitions of Constructs Comprising Caregiver Capabilities

Physical Health

Women in developing countries face many physical health challenges, from multiple sources, including high burdens of diseases (eg, tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, and iron-deficiency anemia, are 3 of the largest contributors of disability-adjusted life-years lost among women of childbearing age in these contexts [22]). In considering physical health, we distinguished between objective and subjective measures. It is widely acknowledged that people may perceive themselves to be healthy despite suffering from a disease, and alternately, others will perceive themselves to have poor health when there is no objective indication of disease [23]. For the purposes of constructing maternal capabilities in the SHINE trial, perceived physical health will be considered.

Mental Health and Stress

Although many aspects of mental illness can affect caregiving, we focus on depression. It is the most prevalent mental health disorder globally and accounts for about 10% of all years lived with disability [24]. Depression often presents with depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, decreased energy, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, and poor concentration [25]. Depression affects a mother's ability to appropriately care for her child, her capacity to positively interact with the baby [26], and her ability to seek healthcare resources [27]. Furthermore, its incidence is about 3 times higher in the year following birth, compared to other periods in a woman's life [28], and this coincides with the time that infants are especially vulnerable, in need of “others” to care for them and sensitive to any insults to their health and nutritional well-being. Consequently, postnatal depressive symptoms can have detrimental effects on the health and development of a baby [27, 29]. The high vulnerability of women in developing countries to depression in the postnatal period may be associated with hormonal changes [29], compounded by poverty, lower social status for women, alcoholism, domestic violence, and lack of autonomy [30].

Perceived Social Support

Social support during the postnatal period, especially from partner and other household members, is widely recognized as essential for the well-being of both mother and baby [31, 32]. Social support has also been highlighted in ecological models of health behavior, including Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory [33]. We focus on assessing women's functional social support, for which 4 elements have been described: (1) informational, (2) instrumental, (3) emotional, and (4) companionship support [34]. To date, much of the analysis of the role of social support and child care practices in developing countries has focused on breastfeeding, and on the provision of informational and emotional support through peer counselors [35, 36].

Autonomy

Autonomy is a multidimensional construct that has been defined by Dixon [37] as the extent to which a woman has access to and control over material and social resources within her household, her community, and in society at large [37]. Autonomy is often defined in 5 dimensions (emotional, physical, economic, knowledge, and decision making) [38] and, considering the provisioning of care for children in the cultural context of Zimbabwe, we chose to focus on household decision-making autonomy. Related to autonomy, we also assess women's attitudes towards gender norms, a broader indication of the environment in which women exercise autonomy, or not. Recently, it has been posited that women with high levels of autonomy might experience a loss of identity if this autonomy appears to be a violation of gender norms in the household and/or communities they reside [39, 40].

Workload and Perceived Time Stress

Although reasonable workloads and the availability of adequate time for women are essential for the provision of care, they are the least explored construct among those identified in the extended UNICEF framework [13]. Many women in rural parts of developing countries average 18-hour days, and it has been recognized that these women often have very little, if any, free or leisure time [41]. Many of these women may be involved in formal and informal income-earning activities, but their roles nearly always include domestic activities, including unpaid subsistence farming, collecting water, gathering fuel (eg, firewood), cooking, other household chores, and activities related to child care, which are often invisible [42]. As their time has been described as a finite and zero-sum condition [13], it inevitably influences their engagement with nutrition interventions and programs. In one study aimed at improving infant feeding practices in rural China, more than half of the mothers who reported not practicing the recommended behaviors gave time constraints as their reason for not doing so [43].

Mothering Self-efficacy

Self-efficacy, or a construct similar to it, is common to many of the health behavior theories used to explain, predict, and change health behaviors, including Bandura's social cognitive theory [44], the health belief model [45], and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior [46, 47]. In many situations, it appears to be a proximal determinant of behavior. Mothering self-efficacy reflects women's sense of self in their role as mothers, and in turn, how confident and competent they are in that role [21]. Although much of the research on the relationship between self-efficacy and infant and young child nutrition behaviors has focused specifically on breastfeeding practices [48-51], other work has shown that low levels of mothering self-efficacy can influence other aspects of childcare [52]. Bandura notes that mothers who have higher levels of mothering self-efficacy are more likely to express interest in and commitment to their role [53]. Ruchala and James proposed high levels of mothering self-efficacy as the most important predictor of positive mothering behaviors [54].

ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL CAPABILITIES

With the exception of stress, time use, and perceived time stress, caregiver capabilities will be assessed using survey items adapted from various instruments. The instruments from which these items were adapted are outlined in Table 3. No appropriate instruments to assess time use and time stress were found in the literature. Therefore, we used qualitative methods to develop items specifically for the SHINE trial. For stress, saliva samples will be collected to test for levels of cortisol, a method that is used widely [60].
Table 3.

Assessment of Caregiver Capabilities Constructs

ConstructSurvey Items Adapted FromaBaselineMonths Postpartum
161218
Perceived physical healthRAND 36-Item Health Survey [55]
DepressionEdinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [56]
StressSalivary cortisola
Perceived social supportInterpersonal support evaluation list [34]Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey [57]
Decision-making autonomyDemographic and Health Survey
Gender norm attitudesGender Norm Attitudes Scale [20]
Time useNo instrument found in the literature; items were developed for the SHINE trial
Perceived time stressNo instrument found in the literature; items were developed for the SHINE trial
Mothering self-efficacyParenting Sense of Competence Scale [58]Parenting Self-agency Measure [59]

a With the exception of salivary cortisol, a biochemical test for stress.

Assessment of Caregiver Capabilities Constructs a With the exception of salivary cortisol, a biochemical test for stress. Following translation of the items into 2 local languages, Ndebele and Shona, all instruments used to assess caregiver capabilities underwent cognitive testing to ensure validity of the questions and response options. Cognitive testing involves in-depth interviewing method to evaluate potential sources of error in survey questions [61]. We used the “think-aloud” and verbal probing techniques concurrently to assess the following basic processes involved in responding to survey questions: comprehension of questions (is the respondent's perception of the question in line the intent of the question?); retrieval from memory information relevant to the questions (what thought processes does the respondent go through to come up with a response for the question?); decision process (is the question sensitive or likely to invoke a socially desirable response?); and response process (are the response options appropriate and/or adequate?) [61]. Additionally, the final survey instruments were pilot-tested. Both the cognitive testing and pilot testing were conducted in a district adjacent to the SHINE study area prior to data collection. Table 3 highlights the time points at which each of the variables will be assessed, starting at baseline. The number of items in the scales we developed or adapted to assess the different caregiver capabilities ranges from 5 to 14. For each of these multi-item scales, composite scores will be generated. For further analyses related to other trial components and discussed in Mbuya et al [12], these scores will be used as continuous scales or as categorical scales. Results from initial psychometric testing, based on data from about 2000 women enrolled in the SHINE Trial, show that the internal consistency and reliability of the scales are acceptable, with Cronbach α ranging from 0.70–0.88. This provides solid evidence that, in addition to being theoretically sound, the items used to assess each of the constructs comprising caregiver capabilities are indeed measuring the same underlying construct.

SHINE TRIAL HYPOTHESES RELATED TO CAREGIVER CAPABILITIES

The behaviors of caregivers of young children are clearly an important step in the pathway to child health, and the SHINE PIP [12] makes explicit that the final delivery of the interventions by caregivers is an aspect of the fidelity of implementation of our interventions. We view caregiver capabilities as an effect modifier of intervention impact, potentially shaping the heterogeneity of the effects of the interventions. We hypothesize that mothers with strong capabilities will be able to utilize resources provided through the SHINE trial (WASH hardware, education, and nutritional supplements) to achieve greater increases in child health outcomes. In other words, stronger caregiver capabilities will strengthen the association between maternal knowledge and WASH and IYCF behaviors. The role of caregiver capabilities likely pertains to multiple other caregiving behaviors, such as optimal breastfeeding practices, participation in vaccination programs, and appropriate care of the sick infant, that are essential for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in infants and are synergistic with SHINE interventions. Additionally, we hypothesize that household visits by village health workers will have a positive effect on some of the caregiver capabilities, particularly time stress, mental health, social support, and mothering self-efficacy. This has been reported previously in an evaluation of a food assistance program in rural Haiti, which had a strong behavior change communication component delivered by community-level workers [62]. In the Haitian evaluation, the investigators found a positive impact of program participation on measures of participants' self-rated health, mental stress, and time stress [62]. However, because SHINE interventions are adding more activities to caregivers' daily routines, it is possible that the interventions will increase their time stress.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been noted previously that understanding the characteristics that promote or constrain the uptake and effective utilization of health interventions could result in more efficient and effective use of resources available for child health promotion [63]. Therefore, building on a solid base of theory, we propose to study the effects of maternal capabilities on a multipronged intervention to improve care and feeding of infants and young children. We designed a holistic and longitudinal quantitative survey assessment of maternal capabilities to be used in the SHINE trial, with specific hypotheses about how these might mediate or modify the intervention effects. It is our hope that the analysis of maternal capabilities in the SHINE trial will reveal avenues for their further exploration in the context of other nutrition and child health interventions, and in the context of other societies.
  30 in total

1.  Mother's perceptions and experiences of infant feeding within a community-based peer counselling intervention in South Africa.

Authors:  Barni Nor; Beth Maina Ahlberg; Tanya Doherty; Yanga Zembe; Debra Jackson; Eva-Charlotte Ekström
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Training peer counselors to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rukhsana Haider; Iqbal Kabir; Sharon R A Huttly; Ann Ashworth
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.219

3.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jai K Das; Arjumand Rizvi; Michelle F Gaffey; Neff Walker; Susan Horton; Patrick Webb; Anna Lartey; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Social support, knowledge of infant development, and maternal confidence among adolescent and adult mothers.

Authors:  P L Ruchala; D C James
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

6.  The correlation between breastfeeding self-efficacy and maternal postpartum depression in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Carlos Zubaran; Katia Foresti
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2012-12-20

Review 7.  What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival.

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Tahmeed Ahmed; Robert E Black; Simon Cousens; Kathryn Dewey; Elsa Giugliani; Batool A Haider; Betty Kirkwood; Saul S Morris; H P S Sachdev; Meera Shekar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research.

Authors:  Dirk H Hellhammer; Stefan Wüst; Brigitte M Kudielka
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Richard Franklin; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jixiang Ma; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Theory-Driven Process Evaluation of the SHINE Trial Using a Program Impact Pathway Approach.

Authors:  Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Andrew D Jones; Robert Ntozini; Jean H Humphrey; Lawrence H Moulton; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; John A Maluccio
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  21 in total

1.  Associations between social support, psychological well-being, decision making, empowerment, infant and young child feeding, and nutritional status in Ugandan children ages 0 to 24 months.

Authors:  Scott B Ickes; Michael Wu; Maia P Mandel; Alison C Roberts
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Maternal employment in low- and middle-income countries is associated with improved infant and young child feeding.

Authors:  Vanessa M Oddo; Scott B Ickes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Fathers' Complementary Feeding Support Strengthens the Association Between Mothers' Decision-Making Autonomy and Optimal Complementary Feeding in Nigeria.

Authors:  Diana Allotey; Valerie L Flax; Abiodun F Ipadeola; Sarah Kwasu; Linda S Adair; Carmina G Valle; Sujata Bose; Stephanie L Martin
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  "Generally the young mom suffers much:" Socio-cultural influences of maternal capabilities and nutrition care in Uganda.

Authors:  Scott B Ickes; Grace A Heymsfield; Timothy W Wright; Charles Baguma
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Development of a cumulative metric of vaccination adherence behavior and its application among a cohort of 12-month-olds in western Kenya.

Authors:  Casey L Benzaken; Joshua D Miller; Maricianah Onono; Sera L Young
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  "If there is no water, we cannot feed our children": The far-reaching consequences of water insecurity on infant feeding practices and infant health across 16 low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Roseanne C Schuster; Margaret S Butler; Amber Wutich; Joshua D Miller; Sera L Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Sharing Histories-a transformative learning/teaching method to empower community health workers to support health behavior change of mothers.

Authors:  Laura C Altobelli
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Early child development in children who are HIV-exposed uninfected compared to children who are HIV-unexposed: observational sub-study of a cluster-randomized trial in rural Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Robert Ntozini; Jaya Chandna; Ceri Evans; Bernard Chasekwa; Florence D Majo; Gwendoline Kandawasvika; Naume V Tavengwa; Batsirai Mutasa; Kuda Mutasa; Lawrence H Moulton; Jean H Humphrey; Melissa J Gladstone; Andrew J Prendergast
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.396

9.  The Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Trial: Rationale, Design, and Methods.

Authors:  Jean H Humphrey; Andrew D Jones; Amee Manges; Goldberg Mangwadu; John A Maluccio; Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Lawrence H Moulton; Robert Ntozini; Andrew J Prendergast; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Theory-Driven Process Evaluation of the SHINE Trial Using a Program Impact Pathway Approach.

Authors:  Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Andrew D Jones; Robert Ntozini; Jean H Humphrey; Lawrence H Moulton; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; John A Maluccio
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.