J Mayerle1, G Beyer2, P Simon2, E J Dickson3, R C Carter3, F Duthie4, M M Lerch2, C J McKay3. 1. Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Germany. Electronic address: mayerle@uni-greifswald.de. 2. Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Germany. 3. Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Pathology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Semiquantitative EUS-elastography has been introduced to distinguish between malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. This study investigated whether semiquantitative EUS-guided transient real time elastography increases the diagnostic accuracy for solid pancreatic lesions compared to EUS-FNA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single centre prospective cohort study included all patients with solitary pancreatic lesions on EUS during one year. Patients underwent EUS-FNA and semiquantitative EUS-elastography during the same session. EUS and elastography results were compared with final diagnosis which was made on the basis of tissue samples and long-term outcome. RESULTS: 91 patients were recruited of which 68 had pancreatic malignancy, 17 showed benign disease and 6 had cystic lesions and were excluded from further analysis. Strain ratios from malignant lesions were significantly higher (24.00; 8.01-43.94 95% CI vs 44.00; 32.42-55.00 95% CI) and ROC analysis indicated optimal cut-off of 24.82 with resulting sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 77%, 65% and 73% respectively. B-mode EUS and EUS-FNA had an accuracy for the correct diagnosis of malignant lesions of 87% and 85%. When lowering the cut-off strain ratio for elastography to 10 the sensitivity rose to 96% with specificity of 43% and accuracy of 84%, resulting in the least accurate EUS-based method. This was confirmed by pairwise comparison. CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative EUS-elastography does not add substantial value to the EUS-based assessment of solid pancreatic lesions when compared to B-mode imaging.
BACKGROUND: Semiquantitative EUS-elastography has been introduced to distinguish between malignant and benign pancreatic lesions. This study investigated whether semiquantitative EUS-guided transient real time elastography increases the diagnostic accuracy for solid pancreatic lesions compared to EUS-FNA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single centre prospective cohort study included all patients with solitary pancreatic lesions on EUS during one year. Patients underwent EUS-FNA and semiquantitative EUS-elastography during the same session. EUS and elastography results were compared with final diagnosis which was made on the basis of tissue samples and long-term outcome. RESULTS: 91 patients were recruited of which 68 had pancreatic malignancy, 17 showed benign disease and 6 had cystic lesions and were excluded from further analysis. Strain ratios from malignant lesions were significantly higher (24.00; 8.01-43.94 95% CI vs 44.00; 32.42-55.00 95% CI) and ROC analysis indicated optimal cut-off of 24.82 with resulting sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 77%, 65% and 73% respectively. B-mode EUS and EUS-FNA had an accuracy for the correct diagnosis of malignant lesions of 87% and 85%. When lowering the cut-off strain ratio for elastography to 10 the sensitivity rose to 96% with specificity of 43% and accuracy of 84%, resulting in the least accurate EUS-based method. This was confirmed by pairwise comparison. CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative EUS-elastography does not add substantial value to the EUS-based assessment of solid pancreatic lesions when compared to B-mode imaging.
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17
Authors: Marcel Gheorghiu; Zeno Sparchez; Ioana Rusu; Sorana D Bolboacă; Radu Seicean; Cristina Pojoga; Andrada Seicean Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 3.390