Literature DB >> 26602076

Outcomes of Patients at Estimated Low, Intermediate, and High Risk Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis.

Israel Moshe Barbash1, Ariel Finkelstein2, Alon Barsheshet3, Amit Segev4, Arie Steinvil2, Abid Assali3, Yanai Ben Gal2, Hana Vaknin Assa3, Paul Fefer4, Alex Sagie3, Victor Guetta4, Ran Kornowski3.   

Abstract

Intermediate- or low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were excluded from earlier transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) clinical trials; however, they are already being treated by TAVI despite a lack of data regarding the safety and efficacy in these patients. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of TAVI in patients at intermediate or low risk. Patients undergoing TAVI during 2008 to 2014 were included into a shared database (n = 1,327). Procedural outcomes were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions. Patients were stratified according to their Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score into 3 groups: high (STS ≥8, n = 223, 17%), intermediate (STS 4 to 8; n = 496, 38%), or low risk (STS <4; n = 576, 45%). Low-risk patients were significantly younger and more likely to be men compared to intermediate- and high-risk patients. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups with a gradual increase in the rates of previous bypass surgery, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, lung disease, and frailty scores, from low to high risk groups. Compared with intermediate- and high-risk patients, low-risk patients were more likely to undergo TAVI through the transfemoral route (81% vs 88% vs 95%, p <0.001) and under conscious sedation (69% vs 72% vs 81%, <0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of procedural complications apart from acute kidney injury (19% vs 17% vs 13%, p = 0.03) and stroke rates (4.5% vs 2% vs 2.3%, p = 0.1). Short- and long-term mortality rates were significantly higher for intermediate- (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.9) and high-risk patients (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.7 to 6.4) than low-risk patients also after multivariate adjustment (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1 to 2.6 and HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.5, respectively; all p <0.05). In conclusion, TAVI for intermediate- and low-risk patients is safe and associated with improved outcome compared with high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26602076     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Predictive value of preprocedural procalcitonin for short- and long-term mortality after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Stanislav Keranov; Won-Keun Kim; Mani Arsalan; Matthias Renker; Till Keller; Timm Bauer; Oliver Dörr; Holger M Nef; Luise Gaede; Helge Möllmann; Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm; Christoph Liebetrau
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The gender paradox in TAVR.

Authors:  Anat Berkovitch; Israel M Barbash
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08

3.  Temporal trends in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, 2008-2014: patient characteristics, procedural issues, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Uri Landes; Alon Barsheshet; Ariel Finkelstein; Victor Guetta; Abid Assali; Amir Halkin; Hanna Vaknin-Assa; Amit Segev; Tamir Bental; Jeremy Ben-Shoshan; Israel M Barbash; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in Korea: the Results of the First Cohort of Korean TAVI Registry.

Authors:  Cheol Woong Yu; Won Jang Kim; Jung Min Ahn; Hyungdon Kook; Se Hun Kang; Jung Kyu Han; Young Guk Ko; Seung Hyuk Choi; Bon Kwon Koo; Kiyuk Chang; Hyo Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Delirium in older patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: incidence, predictors, and cognitive prognosis.

Authors:  Marc Humbert; Christophe J Büla; Olivier Muller; Hélène Krief; Pierre Monney
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Evolution of transcatheter aortic valve implantation over 7 years: results of a prospective single-centre registry of 2000 patients in a large municipal hospital (TAVIK Registry).

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Valentin Herzberger; Jens Bergmann; Peter Bramlage; Lars O Conzelmann; Alexander Würth; Armin Luik; Holger Schröfel; Panagiotis Tzamalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Clinical value of the 20% logistic EuroSCORE cut-off for selecting TAVI candidates: a single-centre cohort study analysis.

Authors:  Guram Imnadze; Steffen Hofmann; Michael Billion; Abbas Ferdosi; Marek Kowalski; Ehab Rajab; Karin Bramlage; Peter Bramlage; Henning Warnecke; Norbert Franz
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-02-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.