Literature DB >> 26601650

The effect of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer on delivery of care and patient outcome: has the use of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer affected the utilization of available resources, proportion of patients meeting the standard of care, and does this translate into changes in patient outcome?

Bradford Richardson1, John Preskitt1, Warren Lichliter1, Stephanie Peschka1, Susanne Carmack2, Gregory de Prisco3, James Fleshman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that mandatory multidisciplinary team (MDT) participation improves process evaluation, outcomes, and technical aspects of surgery for rectal cancer in a stable practice of colorectal surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective review of MDT data was conducted of all patients with colorectal cancer since 2010. Demographic, clinical stage, process evaluation, quality of surgery, and outcome data were collected. Total mesorectal excision and MDT required participation started 2013.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients were included in this study: 47 patients in 2014; 41 patients in 2013; and 42 patients pre-MDT. Improvements were seen in 12 of the 14 preoperative process variables, 6 significantly. Improvement in the completeness of total mesorectal excision (0% to 76%) was significant. Local recurrence occurred in 10% of the pre-MDT group, and follow-up is ongoing in the MDT groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MDT participation improves care of patients with rectal cancer. Preoperative clinical staging, multimodality treatment, pathologic staging, and technical aspects of surgery have improved.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin; Multi-disciplinary teams; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26601650     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary team intervention associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma with liver or lung metastasis.

Authors:  Chien-Hsin Chen; Mao-Chih Hsieh; Wilson T Lao; En-Kwang Lin; Yen-Jung Lu; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Mariana Berho; Rodrigo O Perez; Steven D Wexner; Manish Chand
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Argyrios Ioannidis; Michael Konstantinidis; Sotirios Apostolakis; Christos Koutserimpas; Nikolaos Machairas; Konstantinos M Konstantinidis
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-15

4.  The Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Discussion Intervention on the Prognosis of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Huaqi Zhang; Jishang Yu; Zhewei Wei; Wenhui Wu; Changhua Zhang; Yulong He
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Implementation of lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: a review of evidence-practice gaps.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Elizabeth A Fradgley; David J Barnes
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08

6.  The Variations in Care and Real-world Outcomes in Individuals With Rectal Cancer: Protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort.

Authors:  Sunil Patel; Chad McClintock; Christopher Booth; Shaila Merchant; Carl Heneghan; Clare Bankhead
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-08-05

7.  Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Chen Tsai; Yuan-Chun Huang; Shang-Yun Ho; Yeu-Sheng Tyan; Li-Ting Chiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.